The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual differences in the regulation of intergroup bias: The role of conflict monitoring and neural signals for control.
Abstract
Low-prejudice people vary considerably in their ability to regulate intergroup responses. The authors hypothesized that this variability arises from a neural mechanism for monitoring conflict between automatic race-biased tendencies and egalitarian intentions. In Study 1, they found that low-prejudice participants whose nonprejudiced responses are motivated by internal (but not external) factors exhibited better control on a stereotype-inhibition task than did participants motivated by a combination of internal and external factors. This difference was associated with greater conflict-monitoring activity, measured by event-related potentials, when responses required stereotype inhibition. Study 2 demonstrated that group differences were specific to response control in the domain of prejudice. Results indicate that conflict monitoring, a preconscious component of response control, accounts for variability in intergroup bias among low-prejudice participants.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“CRN amplitude enhancement has also been shown in response to successful stereotype control related to ethnic group membership (Amodio, 2008;Amodio, Devine, & Harmon-Jones, 2008).”
From Interplay of self-other distinction and cognitive control mechanisms in a social automatic imitation task: An ERP study (2021) · cites this paper as Amodio, Devine, & Harmon-Jones, 2008
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606266 · Cited by 20,870
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B
Press, H. (1886) · Cited by 10,087
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047358 · Cited by 8,686
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03203267 · Cited by 7,230
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–259 of 259
Highly sensitive early-onset Alzheimer's disease: a case report
Díaz, J. Á. R., & Zapata-Moreno, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1688924 · Cited by 1
Harmon‐Jones, E., & Harmon‐Jones, C. (2011) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2011.647853 · Cited by 1
Self-citationSelf-Control Over Automatic Associations
Gonsalkorale, K., Sherman, J. W., & Allen, T. J. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195391381.003.0013 · Cited by 1
Social Cognition and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias
Hildebrand, L. K., Monteith, M. J., & Noland, E. S. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197763414.013.20 · Cited by 1
Tumulty, M. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845629.001.0001 · Cited by 1
Empowering People to Break the Prejudice Habit
Devine, P. G. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009214315.048 · Cited by 1
Self-citationPech, G. P., Gishoma, D., & Caspar, É. A. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ra8bw · Cited by 1
Landau, J. (2009) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania)
Motivational and neural systems of religion
Johnson, K. A., Ball, B. H., Brewer, G. A., & Cohen, A. B. (2011) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2011.647854
Sweeney, A. M., Park, J., Clark, S. L., & Freitas, A. L. (2015) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-015-9518-6
Baker, A. C. (2016) · Summit (Simon Fraser University)
Family Matters: People's Perceptions of Family Members Dating Interracially
Iankilevitch, M. (2015) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Associative Priming and Implicit Bias Towards African Americans
White, S. T. (2017)
Effect of Vocal Prosody on Elementary Teachers' Perceptions of Black and White Students.
McCall, C. S. (2017) · Scholarship & Creative Works - Digital UNC a service of University Libraries (University of Northern Colorado)
Motivation Predicts Self-Control of Racial Bias After Viewing Alcohol Advertisements
Petzel, Z. W. (2018) · IRL - University of Missouri, St. Louis (University of Missouri–St. Louis)
Socio-Cultural-Historical Activity Theories of Development in the Age of Hyperglobalization
Cole, M. (2009) · Cultural-Historical Psychology
Tumulty, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845629.003.0004
Consequences for Philosophy of Perception
Tumulty, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845629.003.0005
The Forensic Approach to Experience
Tumulty, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845629.003.0003
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0007
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0009
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0010
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0003
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0005
The influence of multicultural priming on the therapist selection process
Harvey, J. M. (2016)
Slovak Version of Internal and External Motivation to Respond without Prejudice Scale
Michalko, D., & Plichtová, J. (2021) · Studia Psychologica · doi:10.31577/sp.2021.03.825
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0001
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0002
Peacebuilding More Successfully?
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0011
Tumulty, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845629.003.0002
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0006
Tumulty, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845629.003.0001
Tumulty, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845629.003.0006
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0004
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.003.0008
Moral Accountability and Prejudice Control: Evidence from Cardiovascular and EEG Responses
Ellemers, N., & van Nunspeet, F. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203124635-18
Castro, S., Kałamała, P., Bukowski, M., & Wodniecka, Z. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zuqw7
Carchon, I., & Provasi, J. (2024) · Spirale · doi:10.3917/spi.107.0114
Tumulty, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845629.002.0003
Tumulty, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845629.002.0006
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.002.0003
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.002.0006
Fitzduff, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197512654.002.0004
The neural mechanisms of race priming in American politics
Gonzalez, F. J., & Haas, I. J. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2024.12
Lindauer, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197633830.003.0001
Key Objections, Responses, and Clarifications
Lindauer, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197633830.003.0004
Consensus, Justice, and the Social Contract
Lindauer, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197633830.003.0006
Contrasting Approaches and Ways Forward
Lindauer, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197633830.003.0007
What Is Distinctive About Normative Concepts
Lindauer, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197633830.003.0003
Fruitfulness and Its Role in Normative Inquiry
Lindauer, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197633830.003.0002
Motivation and Charitable Giving
Lindauer, M. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197633830.003.0005
Multi-model and Multifocal Approach
Ruffion, A. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-97802-9_1
Venezia, S. A., Splan, E. D., Cleary, S., Cloutier, J., & Kubota, J. T. (2026) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01401-9
Placidi, V., Cuomo, G., Boukarras, S., Era, V., Aglioti, S. M., & Candidi, M. (2026) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2026.2628717
Bettache, K. (2026) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-026-00541-6 · Cited by 1
Neural correlates of mental illness related stigma: a systematic review of neuroimaging evidence
Cabaços, C., Quaresma, M., Pereira, A. T., Madeira, N. G. G. F., Duarte, I. C., Macedo, A., & Castelo-Branco, M. S. (2026) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2026.06.002
Metadata
- Authors
- Amodio, D. M., Devine, P. G., & Harmon-Jones, E.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 60-74
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2154504519
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 64.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2008-02-18)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (BCS-9910702; BCS 0350435)
- National Institutes of Health (T32-MH18931)
- APA
- University of Wisconsin
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- intergroup bias, prejudice, conflict monitoring, response control, individual differences, motivation, event-related potentials
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Black or African American, Cognition, Conflict, Psychological, Evoked Potentials, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Neuropsychology, Prejudice, United States, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
