Cited by 146Forgiveness and Related BehaviorsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyEmotions and Moral Behavior

Not so innocent: Does seeing one's own capability for wrongdoing predict forgiveness?

Exline, Julie Juola, Baumeister, Roy F., Zell, Anne L., Kraft, Amy J., Witvliet, Charlotte V. O.·2008·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

People are more forgiving toward transgressors if they see themselves as capable of committing similar offenses, as demonstrated in 7 studies. Methods included hypothetical scenarios, actual recalled offenses, individual and group processes, and correlational and experimental designs. Three factors mediated the link between personal capability and forgiveness: seeing the other's offense as less severe, greater empathic understanding, and perceiving oneself as similar to the transgressor. In terms of predicting forgiveness, it was important that people's own offenses were similar to the target offense in terms of both severity and type. The personal capability effect was independent of other established predictors of forgiveness and was more pronounced among men than women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.495

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People asked to purposefully look for similarities between themselves and transgressors were more likely to be forgiving than others who did not do so.

    “Experimental results link self-compassion with forgiveness. That is, people asked to purposefully look for similarities between themselves and transgressors were more likely to be forgiving than others who did not do so (Exline et al., 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Zell, A. L., Kraft, A. J., & Witvliet, C. V. O.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Hope College (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2008-03
Volume
94
Issue
3
Pages
495-515
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2035114357
Cited by
146
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
16.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
forgiveness, transgressors, perceived similarity, empathy, gender differences, self-perception, interpersonal transgressions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anger, Attitude, Empathy, Female, Group Processes, Guilt, Humans, Individuality, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Motivation, Mental Recall, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review