Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others
Open accessAbstract
The neural processes underlying empathy are a subject of intense interest within the social neurosciences. However, very little is known about how brain empathic responses are modulated by the affective link between individuals. We show here that empathic responses are modulated by learned preferences, a result consistent with economic models of social preferences. We engaged male and female volunteers in an economic game, in which two confederates played fairly or unfairly, and then measured brain activity with functional magnetic resonance imaging while these same volunteers observed the confederates receiving pain. Both sexes exhibited empathy-related activation in pain-related brain areas (fronto-insular and anterior cingulate cortices) towards fair players. However, these empathy-related responses were significantly reduced in males when observing an unfair person receiving pain. This effect was accompanied by increased activation in reward-related areas, correlated with an expressed desire for revenge. We conclude that in men (at least) empathic responses are shaped by valuation of other people's social behaviour, such that they empathize with fair opponents while favouring the physical punishment of unfair opponents, a finding that echoes recent evidence for altruistic punishment.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Empathic brain responses to another person’s pain are shaped by perceived fairness: participants showed pain-related empathy in fronto-insular and anterior cingulate cortices toward fair players, but men showed reduced empathic responses and increased reward-related activity when an unfair player received pain. The authors conclude that, at least in men, empathy is modulated by social valuation, with unfair opponents’ pain potentially linked to reward and revenge.
Key findings
- After a sequential Prisoner’s Dilemma game, both male and female subjects rated the fair player as significantly more fair, agreeable, likeable, and attractive than the unfair player (scale range 2 to 22; P < 0.001).
- Both sexes showed empathy-related activation in pain-related brain areas, including bilateral anterior insula/fronto-insular cortex and anterior cingulate cortex, when observing a fair player in pain; ACC activation was significant in women ([9, 18, 27]; P < 0.001 uncorrected, P < 0.05 whole-brain corrected) but borderline in men ([29, 39, 27]; P = 0.001 uncorrected).
- Men showed significantly enhanced bilateral fronto-insular activation when observing fair compared with unfair players in pain, whereas women showed no significant difference in empathy-related pain regions for fair versus unfair players.
- In men, but not women, observing an unfair player receiving pain increased activation in left ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens and left orbito-frontal cortex; men also expressed a stronger desire for revenge than women (t(30) = 2.40, P < 0.05), and men with stronger revenge desire showed greater nucleus accumbens activation for unfair versus fair player pain.
Methods
- Subjects were 16 men and 16 women; four professional actors (two female, two male) served as confederates. Subjects played a sequential iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma game in which confederates reciprocated fairly or unfairly, inducing liking or disliking.
- In an empathy-for-pain fMRI task, subjects observed cues indicating that they, the fair player, or the unfair player would receive low or high electrical stimulation; each 12-s trial included a cue followed after 6 s by a circle indicating stimulation onset.
- fMRI data were acquired on a 1.5-T Siemens Sonata scanner and analyzed in SPM2 using an event-related model with a 2 × 3 × 2 factorial design (pain vs no pain; self, fair, unfair; male vs female subject), random-effects group analyses, conjunction/masking, and regression analyses; results are reported at P < 0.005 uncorrected in a priori regions of interest.
Limitations
- The paper states that further experiments are needed to confirm the gender specificity of the effect.
- The paper notes that the experimental design may have favoured men because the punishment modality involved physical threat rather than psychological or financial threat; alternatively, the findings could indicate a predominant role for males in maintaining justice and punishing norm violation.
- Evident from the text: the sample was small (32 subjects), several key results are reported at uncorrected thresholds within a priori regions of interest, and the gender analysis is binary and based on male/female subject groups.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 27 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
In women, the reduction in empathic activity when observing an unfair versus fair player in pain was very small.
“In women this reduction in activity was very small, whereas in men the knowledge that an unfair player was in receipt of pain elicited no increase in empathic activity in FI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For women, there was no significant difference when comparing painful trials for fair versus unfair players in empathy-related pain regions.
“And indeed, formal analysis revealed no significant difference for women when comparing painful trials for fair versus unfair players in empathy-related pain regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Men showed significantly enhanced activation in bilateral FI when observing fair compared with unfair players in pain.
“However, men showed significantly enhanced activation in bilateral FI when observing fair compared with unfair players in pain (Supplementary Tables 8 and 11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Both male and female subjects rated the fair player as significantly more attractive than the unfair player.
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Both male and female subjects rated the fair player as significantly more likeable than the unfair player.
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Seeing an unfamiliar but likeable person in pain elicited pain-related empathic responses in both genders in bilateral AI extending into FI and brainstem.
“Moreover, we observed pain-related empathic responses in both genders in bilateral AI extending into FI and brainstem when seeing an unfamiliar but likeable person in pain (Fig. 2a, b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Men and women who scored higher on standard empathy scales had higher empathy-related brain activity in ACC and AI/FI.
“Furthermore, we extended previous findings10 by showing that men, as well as women, who scored higher on standard empathy scales22 had higher empathy-related brain activity in ACC and AI/FI (Supplementary Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Davis, M. A. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Cat. Selected Docs Psychol. 10, 85 (1980)
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
In both men and women, painful versus non-painful self stimulation increased activity in the pain network, including AI and ACC.
“The comparison of brain activity associated with painful and non-painful trials in the ‘self’ condition for men and women revealed an expected increase in the ‘pain network’, including activity in AI and ACC (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Both male and female subjects rated the fair player as significantly more agreeable than the unfair player.
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Both male and female subjects rated the fair player as significantly more fair than the unfair player.
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In men, the knowledge that an unfair player was in receipt of pain elicited no increase in empathic activity in FI.
“In women this reduction in activity was very small, whereas in men the knowledge that an unfair player was in receipt of pain elicited no increase in empathic activity in FI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Men expressed a stronger desire for revenge than women.
“Figure 3c shows that men expressed a stronger desire for revenge than women (t(30) 1/4 2.40, P , 0.05; Supplementary Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The interaction ((pain-no pain) unfair-(pain-no pain) fair) revealed increased activation in left orbito-frontal cortex.
“This latter comparison also revealed increased activation in left orbito-frontal cortex (Supplementary Table 11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Men showed significantly higher activation than women in left nucleus accumbens in the direct gender comparison for painful trials in the unfair versus fair condition.
“As illustrated in Fig. 3b, the direct gender comparison for painful trials in the unfair and the fair condition ((pain in unfair–pain in fair) men–(pain in unfair–pain in fair) women) revealed that men showed significantly higher activation than women in left nucleus accumbens (in the same peak as identified in the former analysis).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the present study, activation correlated with revenge was observed in ventral striatum.
“In the present study we observed activation correlated with revenge in ventral striatum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Men, but not women, who expressed a stronger desire for revenge showed greater activation in nucleus accumbens when perceiving an unfair player receiving painful stimuli than when perceiving a fair player in pain.
“As illustrated in Fig. 3d, regression analysis confirmed that men, but not women, who expressed a stronger desire for revenge showed greater activation in nucleus accumbens when they perceived an unfair player receiving painful stimuli than when they perceived a fair player in pain (Supplementary Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In men, but not women, there was increased activation in left ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens in the comparison of painful trials in the unfair versus fair condition.
“As shown in Fig. 3a, we observed increased activation in left ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens for men, but not for women, in the comparison of painful trials in the unfair and the fair condition (pain in unfair–pain in fair) as well as in the interaction ((pain–no pain) unfair–(pain–no pain) fair).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In men, but not women, there was increased activation in left ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens in the interaction ((pain-no pain) unfair-(pain-no pain) fair).
“As shown in Fig. 3a, we observed increased activation in left ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens for men, but not for women, in the comparison of painful trials in the unfair and the fair condition (pain in unfair–pain in fair) as well as in the interaction ((pain–no pain) unfair–(pain–no pain) fair).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Neurobiological observations were more prominent in men.
“Our corresponding neurobiological observations were more prominent in men, although further experiments are needed to confirm the gender specificity of the effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The difference in evoked activity in dorsal and ventral regions of the striatum is likely to reflect the different nature of the tasks used.
“This difference in evoked activity in dorsal and ventral regions of the striatum is likely to reflect the different nature of the tasks used.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The data provide neurobiological evidence on how fairness in social interactions shapes the nature of the affective link between people.
“Our data provide neurobiological evidence on how fairness in social interactions shapes the nature of the affective link between people.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Enhanced activation in ventral striatum to a signal indicating that a defector is receiving pain is in agreement with the hypothesis that humans derive satisfaction simply from seeing justice administered.
“The findings of enhanced activation in ventral striatum to a signal indicating that a defector is receiving pain are in agreement with the hypothesis that humans derive satisfaction simply from seeing justice administered15,21, even if the instrument of punishment is out of their control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
The results suggest a neural foundation for theories of social preferences.
“Our results suggest a neural foundation for theories of social preferences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A previous imaging study reported enhanced activation in dorsal striatum (caudate nucleus) when individuals punished defectors in a sequential Prisoner's Dilemma game.
“These findings complement those of a previous imaging study that reported enhanced activation in dorsal striatum (caudate nucleus) when individuals punished defectors (by delivering ‘punishment points’) in a sequential Prisoner's Dilemma game21.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] de Quervain, D. J. et al. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305, 1254–1258 (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 8
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataACC activation to seeing a fair person in pain was significant in women but borderline in men.
“The activation in ACC was significant in women ([9, 18, 27]; P , 0.001 uncorrected, P , 0.05 whole-brain corrected) but was borderline in men ([29, 39, 27]; P 1/4 0.001 uncorrected; Supplementary Tables 4 and 5; coordinates refer to the peak of activations in MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) space).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWomen but not men displayed significant activation in bilateral AI/FI and ACC in all three conditions (self, fair, unfair).
“Consistent with this finding, supplementary analysis showed that women but not men displayed significant activation in bilateral AI/FI and ACC in all three conditions (Supplementary Tables 7 and 10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe perception-action model of empathy states that observation or imagination of another person in a particular emotional state automatically activates a representation of that state in the observer.
“The perception–action model of empathy states that the observation or imagination of another person in a particular emotional state automatically activates a representation of that state in the observer1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Preston, S. D. & de-Waal, F. B. M. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–72 (2002) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThese results suggest that our ability to empathize relies on neuronal systems that underpin our own bodily and emotional states.
“These results suggest that our ability to empathize relies on neuronal systems that underpin our own bodily and emotional states1,2,10,13.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [1] Preston, S. D. & de-Waal, F. B. M. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–72 (2002) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Gallese, V., Keysers, C. & Rizzolatti, G. A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 396–403 (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Craig, A. D. Human feelings: why are some more aware than others? Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 239–241 (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll four possible gender combinations between the sex of the subject and the sex of the confederates were used equally often throughout the study.
“Although the two confederates were always of the same sex, all four possible gender combinations between the sex of the subject and the sex of the confederates were used equally often throughout the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTheories of social preferences suggest that people value the gains of others positively if they are perceived to behave fairly, but value others' gains negatively if they behave unfairly.
“These theories4,7 suggest that people value the gains of others positively if they are perceived to behave fairly, but value others' gains negatively if they behave unfairly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Rabin, M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 83, 1281–1302 (1993)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 114, 817–868 (1999) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationSubjects completed a standard empathy scale.
“After scanning, subjects completed a standard empathy scale22 and were asked to rate the intensity of the low and high stimulation, their liking for the two confederates, and their desire for revenge on the two confederates (see Fig. 1b, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Davis, M. A. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Cat. Selected Docs Psychol. 10, 85 (1980)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn men (at least), empathic responses are shaped by valuation of other people's social behaviour, such that they empathize with fair opponents while favouring physical punishment of unfair opponents.
“We conclude that in men (at least) empathic responses are shaped by valuation of other people's social behaviour, such that they empathize with fair opponents while favouring the physical punishment of unfair opponents, a finding that echoes recent evidence for altruistic punishment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe pattern of preferences implies that people like cooperating with fair opponents but also like punishing unfair opponents.
“This pattern of preferences implies that people like cooperating with fair opponents but also like punishing unfair opponents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationStudies on empathy for pain have found that activation observed in AI/FI and ACC to pain in oneself is also seen when observing pain in someone else.
“For example, studies on empathy for pain have found that the activation observed in anterior insula/fronto-insular cortex (AI/FI) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) to pain in oneself is also seen when observing pain in someone else10,12.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., di Pellegrino, G. & Roberts, N. Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 270–278 (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataCues indicating self, fair player, or unfair player and pain/no pain were presented in random order.
“As shown in Fig. 1c, cues (coloured arrows) were presented in random order indicating whether she/he (self condition), the fair player (fair condition) or the unfair player (unfair condition) would get low stimulation (no pain condition) or high stimulation (pain condition).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIt has been shown that people reward others for cooperative behaviour but punish violations of social fairness even at a personal cost, an effect likely to be mediated by neural mechanisms that provide intrinsic motivation (satisfaction) from punishing violators.
“It has been shown that people reward others for cooperative behaviour but punish violations of social fairness even at a personal cost15,16, an effect likely to be mediated by neural mechanisms that provide intrinsic motivation (that is, satisfaction) from punishing violators21.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [15] Fehr, E. & Gachter, S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415, 137–140 (2002) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425, 785–791 (2003) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] de Quervain, D. J. et al. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305, 1254–1258 (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRecent imaging studies provide evidence for common activation elicited when experiencing disgust, touch or pain in oneself, and when perceiving the same feelings in others.
“Recent imaging studies provide evidence for common activation elicited when experiencing disgust8, touch9 or pain10-12 in oneself, and when perceiving the same feelings in others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [8] Wicker, B. et al. Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 40, 655–664 (2003) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Keysers, C. et al. A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron 42, 335–346 (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N. & Decety, J. How do we perceive the pain of others: A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage 3, 771–779 (2005) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., di Pellegrino, G. & Roberts, N. Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 270–278 (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenResults are reported at P < 0.005 uncorrected for multiple comparisons in a priori regions of interest.
“We report results at P < 0.005 uncorrected for multiple comparisons in the a priori regions of interest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCooperation nourishes the affective link, but selfish behaviour detrimental to others effectively compromises this link (at least with males), such that empathic responses in the brain are diminished or abolished.
“Our findings indicate that cooperation nourishes this link, but selfish behaviour that is detrimental to others effectively compromises this link (at least with males), such that empathic responses in the brain are diminished or abolished.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe findings are consistent with different functions associated with distinct regions of the striatum: afferent projections to dorsal striatum are crucial for learning correct actions to maximize reward, whereas projections to ventral striatum including nucleus accumbens have a key function in reward prediction and pavlovian learning.
“These findings are consistent with the different functions associated with distinct regions of the striatum: afferent projections to dorsal striatum are thought to be crucial for learning correct actions so as to maximize reward, whereas projections to ventral striatum, including nucleus accumbens, have a key function in reward prediction and pavlovian learning18-20,23,24.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [18] Cardinal, R. N., Parkinson, J. A., Hall, J. & Everitt, B. J. Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26, 321–352 (2002) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] O'Doherty, J. et al. Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning. Science 304, 452–454 (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Schultz, W. Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 1, 199–207 (2000) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Dayan, P. & Balleine, B. W. Reward, motivation, and reinforcement learning. Neuron 36, 285–298 (2002) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Montague, P. R., Hyman, S. E. & Cohen, J. D. Computational roles for dopamine in behavioural control. Nature 431, 760–767 (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe position (left or right) of the actor (fair or unfair) was counterbalanced across subjects.
“The position (left or right) of the actor (fair or unfair) was counterbalanced across subjects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The modulation of empathic neural responses by the social relations between individuals is unknown.
“However, it is unclear whether or how these responses are modulated by the social relations between individuals.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms.
“males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms”
From Anterior insular cortex and emotional awareness (2013) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
The passage labeled Abstract reports different empathic neural responses in men and women when they observed an unfair person receiving pain. It does not establish that males and females use different strategies across emotion paradigms; the finding concerns responses in this specific empathy-for-pain task. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAll parts of insula (posterior, mid and anterior) as well as cACC may be regulated by top-down systems during processing of bottom-up interoceptive input and processing of top-down induced activation in the interoceptive stream.
“While it is not clear to what extent early interoceptive signals are prone to modulation, it has been shown that all parts of insula (posterior, mid and anterior) as well as cACC may be regulated by top-down systems during processing of bottom-up interoceptive input (Atlas and Wager, 2014) and processing of top-down induced activation in the interoceptive stream (Singer et al., 2006; Rutgen et al.”
From Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability (2016) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
The Abstract reports that learned preferences modulated empathy-related activity in fronto-insular and anterior cingulate cortices when participants observed others receiving pain. It does not establish regulation of posterior and mid-insula, or identify a top-down system acting on an interoceptive stream. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn male participants, ventral striatum activity increases when passively seeing a partner, who has previously acted unfairly, incur pain.
“That is, in male participants, ventral striatum activity increases when passively seeing partner, who has previously acted unfairly, incur pain 98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In certain conditions, ventral striatum activity appears related to seeing others receive a deserved misfortune.
“In certain conditions, ventral striatum activity appears related to seeing others receive a deserved misfortune.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
The striatum displays signals related to observing a punishment meted out to someone who has acted unfairly.
“The striatum displays signals that are related to making a decision to punish someone for acting unfairly 96, 97, as well as related to observing a punishment meted out to someone who has acted unfairly 98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
The level of ventral striatum activation is related to male participants' desire for revenge against the unfair partner.
“Furthermore, the level of ventral striatum activation is related to male participants’ desire for revenge against the unfair partner98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
The sample was restricted to female participants to control for possible gender effects.
“As gender differences in social emotions were observed in previous neuroscientific research (e.g.Singer et al., 2006), we decided to control for possible gender effects by restricting our sample to female participants only.”
From Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training (2014) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Cites
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264 · see citing works
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688 · see citing works
Self-citationAltruistic punishment in humans
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415137a · Cited by 5,616 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Increased pain-related activation (asterisk indicates whole-brain corrected) for women in ACC* [9, 18, 27], left FI* [242, 15,23], right FI* [30, 18,218], left SII* [260,230, 18], right SII* [63,230, 24] and brainstem* [3,218,218]; for men in left FI* [233, 33, 3] right FI [42, 33, 3] and brainstem [3,233,230].”
BackgroundTrust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548 · see citing works
Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics
Rabin, M. (2011) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.15 · Cited by 4,833 · see citing works
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,712 · see citing works
Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126 · see citing works
Empathy for Pain Involves the Affective but not Sensory Components of Pain
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093535 · Cited by 3,929 · see citing works
Self-citationBehavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction
Camerer, C. F. (2003) · Cited by 3,801 · see citing works
Spatial registration and normalization of images
Friston, K. J., Ashburner, J., Frith, C., Poline, J.-B., Heather, J. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1995) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460030303 · Cited by 3,744 · see citing works
Self-citationFehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02043 · Cited by 3,475 · see citing works
The functional architecture of human empathy
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004) · Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews · doi:10.1177/1534582304267187 · Cited by 3,407 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Increased pain-related activation (asterisk indicates whole-brain corrected) for women in ACC* [9, 18, 27], left FI* [242, 15,23], right FI* [30, 18,218], left SII* [260,230, 18], right SII* [63,230, 24] and brainstem* [3,218,218]; for men in left FI* [233, 33, 3] right FI [42, 33, 3] and brainstem [3,233,230].”
BackgroundBehavioral Game Theory. Experiments in Strategic Interaction
Tyran, J. (2003) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2003.10.009 · Cited by 2,314 · see citing works
A unifying view of the basis of social cognition
GALLESE, V, KEYSERS, C., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.002 · Cited by 2,236 · see citing works
Both of Us Disgusted in My Insula
Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J.-P., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00679-2 · Cited by 2,185 · see citing works
Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex
Cardinal, R. N., Parkinson, J. A., Hall, J., & Everitt, B. J. (2002) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(02)00007-6 · Cited by 2,129 · see citing works
Dissociable Roles of Ventral and Dorsal Striatum in Instrumental Conditioning
O'Doherty, J., Dayan, P., Schultz, J., Deichmann, R., Friston, K., & Dolan, R. J. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1094285 · Cited by 2,088 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment
de Quervain, D. J.-F., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A., & Fehr, E. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100735 · Cited by 1,768 · see citing works
The evolution of altruistic punishment
Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S., & Richerson, P. J. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0630443100 · Cited by 1,748 · see citing works
Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1997) · Cited by 1,713 · see citing works
Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments
Levine, D. K. (1998) · Review of Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1006/redy.1998.0023 · Cited by 1,458 · see citing works
Multiple reward signals in the brain
Schultz, W. (2000) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35044563 · Cited by 1,303 · see citing works
How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy
Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.006 · Cited by 1,257 · see citing works
Computational roles for dopamine in behavioural control
Montague, P. R., Hyman, S. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03015 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Reward, Motivation, and Reinforcement Learning
Dayan, P., & Balleine, B. W. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00963-7 · Cited by 855 · see citing works
Keysers, C. (2004) · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00156-4 · Cited by 806 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The activation in ACC was significant in women ([9, 18, 27]; P , 0.”
BackgroundVicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: Is empathy a multisensory issue?
Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., Di Pellegrino, G., & Roberts, N. (2004) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.4.2.270 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Human feelings: why are some more aware than others?
Craig, A. D. (. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.004 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Brain Responses to the Acquired Moral Status of Faces
Singer, T., Kiebel, S. J., Winston, J. S., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00014-5 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Self-citationRetinotopic organization of early visual spatial attention effects as revealed by PET and ERPs
Woldorff, M. G., Fox, P. T., Matzke, M., Lancaster, J. L., Veeraswamy, S., Zamarripa, F., Seabolt, M., Glass, T. G., Gao, J., Martin, C. C., et al. (1997) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1997)5:4 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Putting the Altruism Back into Altruism: The Evolution of Empathy
de Waal, F. B. M. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625 · Cited by 2,483 · see citing works
“…of previous experience have recently been confirmed by functional magnetic resonance imaging: Seeing the pain of a cooperative confederate activates painrelated brain areas, but seeing the pain of an unfair confederate activates reward-related brain areas, at least in men (Singer et al. 2006).”
Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review
Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018807 · Cited by 2,200 · see citing works
“For example, does the neural representation of another person's undeserved pain differ from the neural representation of morally justified or retributive pain (Decety, Michalska, & Akitsuki, 2008; Singer et al., 2006)? Studies of central nervous system activity also offer the promise of testing some of the predictions…”
BackgroundThe social constructionist movement in modern psychology.
Gergen, K. J. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.40.3.266 · Cited by 3,987 · see citing works
Lamm, C., Decety, J., & Singer, T. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014 · Cited by 2,016 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial Cognitive Neuroscience: A Review of Core Processes
Lieberman, M. D. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654 · Cited by 2,010 · see citing works
“From childhood through adulthood, increasingly complex and domain-specific theories form (Reeder 1993), although this increasing sophistication does not always yield greater accuracy (Gilbert & Malone 1995).”
The social neuroscience of empathy
Singer, T., & Lamm, C. (2009) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04418.x · Cited by 1,981 · see citing works
“…fMRI literature, which has so far demonstrated shared somatosensory activations only in secondary somatosensory cortex (e.g., Jackson et al. 2006a; Singer et al. 2006) or in parts of primary somatosensory cortex that are not somatotopically specific for the affected body part (Lamm et al. 2007b).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationThe Social Brain: Neural Basis of Social Knowledge
Adolphs, R. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163514 · Cited by 1,827 · see citing works
“In studies of empathy, it was found that our perception of other people's fairness (from their behavior in an economic game) modulated how much empathy was felt when they were observed to be given painful electric shock, an effect that correlated with activation of the insula (Singer et al. 2006).”
The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Scope, Evolution and Enhancements
Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007) · Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch · doi:10.3790/schm.127.1.139 · Cited by 1,777 · see citing works
“…See, e.g., Camerer et al. (2005), Borghans et al. (2005) and Hsu et al. (2005), De Quervain et al. (2004), McCLure et al. (2004), Kuhnen/Knutson (2005), Knutson/Peterson (2005), Fehr et al. (2005a, b), Singer et al. (2006) and for a broader social science perspective, Freese et al. (2003).”
The empathic brain: how, when and why?
de Vignemont, F., & Singer, T. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008 · Cited by 1,716 · see citing works
Self-citationPuzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition
Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H. (2009) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01125.x · Cited by 1,475 · see citing works
An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance
Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., & Myers, J. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12003196 · Cited by 1,381 · see citing works
“…in response to primary rewards such as food (McClure et al. 2003; O’Doherty et al. 2003), secondary rewards such as money (Kuhnen & Knutson, 2005), and social rewards such as positive social comparison or one’s rivals experiencing pain (Fliessbach et al. 2007; Hein et al. 2010; Singer et al. 2006).”
The Neural Substrate of Human Empathy: Effects of Perspective-taking and Cognitive Appraisal
Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.42 · Cited by 1,464 · see citing works
“This confirms several recent fMRI studies ( Jackson et al., 2005, 2006; Singer et al., 2004, 2006; Botvinick et al., 2005; Morrison et al., 2004), which indicate that ACC and anterior insula activity during the observation of pain is related to the affective aspects of pain processing rather than…”
ResultKurth, F., Zilles, K., Fox, P. T., Laird, A. R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2010) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0255-z · Cited by 1,293 · see citing works
“2003) and the feeling of pain in others (Frith and Singer 2008; Singer et al. 2006).”
BackgroundA common role of insula in feelings, empathy and uncertainty
Singer, T., Critchley, H. D., & Preuschoff, K. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.05.001 · Cited by 1,270 · see citing works
Self-citationGergen, K. J. (1973) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0034436 · Cited by 1,845 · see citing works
Singer, T. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.011 · Cited by 1,079 · see citing works
“In the experiments undertaken so far (Wicker et al., 2003; Keysers et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004a, 2006; Morrison et al., 2004), subjects were neither required to make any explicit judgment about the feelings of the other person (for an exception see Avenanti et al., 2005, commented on by…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationEffectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review
Derksen, F., Bensing, J., & Lagro-Janssen, A. (2013) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp13x660814 · Cited by 1,034 · see citing works
“fMRI experiments have shown that individuals who score higher in a questionnaire measuring their tendency to place themselves in the other person’s shoes activate their MNS more strongly while listening to other people’s problems.(10,11) These results draw the ‘soft’ concept of empathy into ‘hard’ science, which opens…”
Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience.
Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2006) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1100/tsw.2006.221 · Cited by 1,051 · see citing works
“Singer and colleagues[91] engaged participants in a sequential Prisoner’s dilemma game with confederate targets, who would either play the game in a fair or unfair way.”
BackgroundResultLutz, A., Brefczynski-Lewis, J., Johnstone, T., & Davidson, R. J. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001897 · Cited by 942 · see citing works
“Recently, researchers have begun to investigate whether these empathy processes can be modulated by the implicit context of the empathic experience [8,16].”
BackgroundThe German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Evolution, Scope and EnhancementsPreprint
Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1028709 · Cited by 941 · see citing works
Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior
Christov-Moore, L., Simpson, E. A., Coudé, G., Grigaityte, K., Iacoboni, M., & Ferrari, P. F. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001 · Cited by 1,137 · see citing works
“A uthor M anuscript A uthor M anuscript A uthor M anuscript A uthor M anuscript played an economic game with cooperative and non-cooperative confederates and then watched the confederates inflicted with pain (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialIs there a core neural network in empathy? an fMRI based quantitative meta-analysis
Fan, Y., Duncan, N. W., de Greck, M., & Northoff, G. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.10.009 · Cited by 902 · see citing works
Zaki, J. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037679 · Cited by 852 · see citing works
Hein, G., Silani, G., Preuschoff, K., Batson, C. D., & Singer, T. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.003 · Cited by 821 · see citing works
“In social contexts, NAcc activation has also been observed when people derive pleasure from themisfortune of others (Singer et al., 2006; Takahashi et al., 2009).”
InfluentialSelf-citationBernhardt, B. C., & Singer, T. (2012) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150536 · Cited by 952 · see citing works
“From Nemiah 1977 ASD: autism spectrum disorder empathic traits ( Jabbi et al. 2007; Saarela et al. 2007; Singer et al. 2004, 2006).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationSomatosensation in social perception
Keysers, C., Kaas, J. H., & Gazzola, V. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2833 · Cited by 787 · see citing works
The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism - Experimental Evidence and New TheoriesPreprint
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2005) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.726 · Cited by 843 · see citing works
Do you feel my pain? Racial group membership modulates empathic neural responses
Xu, X., Zuo, X., Wang, X., & Han, S. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2418-09.2009 · Cited by 798 · see citing works
“However, the empathic neural responses are modulated by affective link between individuals (Singer et al., 2006) and top-down attention to painful cues in stimuli (Gu and Han, 2007; Fan and Han, 2008).”
BackgroundThe Neuroscience of Social Decision-Making
Rilling, J. K., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131647 · Cited by 775 · see citing works
“…increased rejection rates by impairing emotion regulation (Crockett 2009) or by decreasing the value of an abstract monetary reward (Moretti et al. 2009) relative to the immediate social reward of successfully punishing the unfair proposer (de Quervain et al. 2004, Singer et al. 2006) (see below).”
InfluentialSocial neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences
Fehr, E., & Camerer, C. F. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.002 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
The Emotional Construction of Morals
PRINZ, J. J. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571543.001.0001 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
Empathy and the somatotopic auditory mirror system in humans
Gazzola, V., Aziz-Zadeh, L., & Keysers, C. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.072 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
“EC has been shown to correlate with insular activation while subjects were aware of other people’s pain [46, 47].”
BackgroundAnterior insular cortex and emotional awareness
Gu, X., Hof, P. R., Friston, K. J., & Fan, J. (2013) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.23368 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
“Third, although we were not able to compare gender differences in the current meta-analysis, males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms (Baron-Cohen and Wheelwright, 2004; Singer et al., 2006; Schulte-Ruther et al., 2008).”
Us and Them: Intergroup Failures of Empathy
Cikara, M., Bruneau, E. G., & Saxe, R. R. (2011) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721411408713 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
“For male participants, brain regions associated with experiencing ‘‘reward’’ (i.e., left ventral striatum including nucleus accumbens) show positive activation when a competitor receives a painful electric shock (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundThe neurobiology of rewards and values in social decision making
Ruff, C. C., & Fehr, E. (2014) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3776 · Cited by 716 · see citing works
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2006) · Handbook on the economics of giving, reciprocity and altruism · doi:10.1016/s1574-0714(06)01008-6 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training
Klimecki, O. M., Leiberg, S., Ricard, M., & Singer, T. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst060 · Cited by 676 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial Decision-Making: Insights from Game Theory and Neuroscience
Sanfey, A. G. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1142996 · Cited by 683 · see citing works
Empathic brain responses in insula are modulated by levels of alexithymia but not autism
Bird, G., Silani, G., Brindley, R., White, S., Frith, U., & Singer, T. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq060 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
“More importantly, we extended previous findings that showed modulation of empathic brain responses in insular cortices as a function of contextual appraisal and affective link (Singer et al., 2006; Lamm et al., 2007a, b; Hein and Singer, 2008) to the domain of individual trait characteristics.”
Self-citationBrain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging
Hari, R., & Kujala, M. V. (2009) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2007 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
“(215), subjects first played a game with a fair and an unfair partner and saw the game partner receive painful stimuli.”
BackgroundInfluentialOlsson, A., & Phelps, E. A. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1968 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
“, and the affective response in an observer can be modified by contex”
BackgroundReinforcement Learning Signal Predicts Social Conformity
Klucharev, V., Hytönen, K., Rijpkema, M., Smidts, A., & Fernández, G. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.027 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
“The current view on the functional role of the neural prediction error signal seems to suggest a threshold for error-related activity (similar to perceptual and motor decision making models, (e.g., Schall et al., 2002) that triggers the adjustment of future behavior ( Schultz, 2006 ).”
InfluentialI feel how you feel but not always: the empathic brain and its modulation
Hein, G., & Singer, T. (2008) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.012 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
“A more recent study [33] with the interactive empathy for pain paradigm showed that empathic brain responses in AI and ACC are not restricted to a beloved partner, but also occur when an unknown, but likable person is in pain.”
InfluentialSelf-citationThe Rupture and Repair of Cooperation in Borderline Personality Disorder
King‐Casas, B., Sharp, C., Lomax-Bream, L., Lohrenz, T. M., Fonagy, P., & Montague, P. R. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1156902 · Cited by 603 · see citing works
Compassion training alters altruism and neural responses to suffering.
Weng, H. Y., Fox, A. S., Shackman, A. J., Stodola, D. E., Caldwell, J. Z. K., Olson, M. C., Rogers, G. M., & Davidson, R. J. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612469537 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
“…implicated in studies of empathy and compassion (Immordino-Yang, McColl, Damasio, & Damasio, 2009; Lamm et al., 2011; Lutz, Brefczynski-Lewis, et al., 2008; Singer et al., 2006) and predicts helping behavior (Hein, Silani, Preuschoff, Batson, & Singer, 2010; Masten, Morelli, & Eisenberger, 2011).”
BackgroundEmpathy for positive and negative emotions in the gustatory cortex
Jabbi, M., Swart, M., & Keysers, C. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.032 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
“The IFO is also activated when participants observe facial expressions of pain, know a loved one is in pain or experience pain themselves (Singer et al., 2004, 2006; Decety and Jackson, 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2006; Lamm et al., in press; Saarela et al., in press), with the…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Neural Signature of Social Norm Compliance
Spitzer, M., Fischbacher, U., Herrnberger, B., Grön, G., & Fehr, E. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.011 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
“, 2002, 2005; Raine and Yang, 2006), social cooperation (Rilling et al., 2002; Singer et al., 2006; Delgado et al., 2005; King-Casas et al., 2005), and social punishment (Sanfey et al.”
BackgroundCulture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: a transcultural neuroimaging approach
Han, S., & Northoff, G. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2456 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
The role of anterior insular cortex in social emotions
Lamm, C., & Singer, T. (2010) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0251-3 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
“This study (Singer et al. 2006) showed that empathy-related neural responses in AI and dACC were significantly reduced when participants observed unfair players, but only in the male subsample.”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping
Amodio, D. M. (2014) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3800 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Racial bias reduces empathic sensorimotor resonance with other-race pain
Avenanti, A., Sirigu, A., & Aglioti, S. M. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.071 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
Hare, T. A., Camerer, C. F., Knoepfle, D. T., O'Doherty, J. P., & Rangel, A. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4089-09.2010 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Self-citationMorrison, I., Löken, L. S., & Olausson, H. (2009) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2007-y · Cited by 549 · see citing works
“2007), previous interaction with or empathizing with the ‘‘victim’’ (Singer et al. 2006; Loggia et al. 2008), compassion (Farrow et al.”
Gender differences in brain networks supporting empathy
Schulte-Rüther, M., Markowitsch, H. J., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., & Piefke, M. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.180 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
“Singer et al. (2006) observed in a study of empathy for pain of other people that both sexes showed activation of similar brain areas during both the self-experience of pain and the observation of painful stimulation of others.”
BackgroundResultPhysicians down-regulate their pain empathy response: An event-related brain potential study
Jean Decety, A., Yang, C.-Y., & Cheng, Y. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.025 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
“…of pain in others can be modulated by a host of factors including attentional demands (Fan and Han, 2008; Gu and Han, 2007), social relationship between individuals (Singer et al., 2006), cognitive appraisal (Lamm et al., 2007), and a priori attitudes towards others (Decety et al., 2009).”
BackgroundHuman Motivation and Social Cooperation: Experimental and Analytical Foundations
Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. M. (2007) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131812 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
“Singer et al. (2006) have shown that merely observing the punishment of a cheater also activates important components of the human reward system.”
BackgroundHurley, S. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07003123 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Frith, C. D. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.2003 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
“We feel less empathy, in terms of subjective report and brain activity, if someone who has just treated us unfairly receives pain, especially if we are male (Singer et al. 2006).”
BackgroundSelf-citationStructural anatomy of empathy in neurodegenerative disease
Rankin, K. P., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Allison, S. C., Stanley, C. M., Glenn, S., Weiner, M. W., & Miller, B. L. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl254 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
“…the functional circuits involved in empathy (Farrow et al., 2001; Decety and Chaminade, 2003; Shamay- Tsoory et al., 2005b; Vollm et al., 2005; Singer et al., 2006), only complementary data from human lesion studies can provide information about the relative importance of particular…”
BackgroundWhen your gain is my pain and your pain is my gain: neural correlates of envy and schadenfreude
Takahashi, H., Kato, M., Matsuura, M., Mobbs, D., Suhara, T., & Okubo, Y. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165604 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy
Decety, J., & Svetlova, M. (2012) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.003 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Being Together in Time: Musical Experience and the Mirror Neuron System
Overy, K., & Molnar-Szakacs, I. (2009) · Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1525/mp.2009.26.5.489 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
“…Batson, & Decety, 2007; Morrison, Lloyd, di Pellegrino, & Roberts, 2004; This content downloaded from 129.215.19.194 on Fri, 13 Dec 2013 06:55:54 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Morrison, Peelen, & Downing, 2007; Ochsner et al., 2008; Singer et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment
Rockenbach, B., & Milinski, M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05229 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Us versus them: social identity shapes neural responses to intergroup competition and harm
Cikara, M., Botvinick, M. M., & Fiske, S. T. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610397667 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
“…(Botvinick et al., 2005; Decety & Ickes, 2009), respectively; however, more recent research has demonstrated that participants exhibit the opposite neural responses when they witness a competitor’s rewards and punishments (de Bruijn et al., 2009; Singer et al., 2006; Takahashi et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSocial Functionality of Human Emotion
Niedenthal, P. M., & Bräuer, M. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131605 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
“Similarly, other fMRI studies documented increases in the activation of pain-related regions during observation of a confederate receiving a painful stimulus, but only if the confederate had played fairly in a previous economic game (Singer et al. 2006).”
ResultAn fMRI investigation of empathy for ‘social pain’ and subsequent prosocial behavior
Masten, C. L., Morelli, S. A., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.060 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
“Based on previous work showing that the same regions are involved in both direct and observed experiences of physical pain (dACC, anterior insula; Singer et al., 2004, 2006), we expected that regions associated with the distressing experience of social exclusion (dACC, anterior insula; Eisenberger…”
BackgroundPlacebo and the New Physiology of the Doctor-Patient Relationship
Benedetti, F. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00043.2012 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
“The same group (297) showed that the empathic brain responses in the anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex were not restricted to a beloved partner, but also occurred when an unknown but likable person was in pain, which has obvious implications for the doctor-patient interaction.”
BackgroundCikara, M., Bruneau, E., Bavel, J. J. V., & Saxe, R. R. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness
McCullough, M. E., Kurzban, R., & Tabak, B. A. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11002160 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Expertise modulates the perception of pain in others
Cheng, Y., Lin, C.-P., Liu, H.-L., Hsu, Y.-Y., Lim, K.-E., Hung, D., & Decety, J. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.09.020 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
“Our results add to the recent findings that the perception of pain can be modulated by attentional demands [18], as well as by social relations between individuals [17].”
ResultA biopsychosocial formulation of pain communication.
Hadjistavropoulos, T., Craig, K. D., Duck, S., Cano, A., Goubert, L., Jackson, P. L., Mogil, J. S., Rainville, P., Sullivan, M. J. L., Williams, A. C. D. C., et al. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0023876 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
“Advances in neuroscience leading to fuller understanding of brain mechanisms associated with pain have now led to recognition that neurophysiological regulation of pain includes responses to the social environment in which pain is experienced (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundTuskegee and the Health of Black Men*
Alsan, M., & Wanamaker, M. (2018) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjx029 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences
Tricomi, E., Rangel, A., Camerer, C. F., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08785 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Computation of Social Behavior
Behrens, T. E. J., Hunt, L. T., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1169694 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
The social communication model of pain.
Craig, K. D. (2009) · Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/a0014772 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Oxytocin Attenuates Affective Evaluations of Conditioned Faces and Amygdala Activity
Petrovic, P., Kalisch, R., Singer, T., & Dolan, R. J. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4572-07.2008 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
“Moreover, because social-affective responses are modified with respect to our experience of others (Singer et al., 2006), we conjectured that oxytocin on acquired negative affective ratings related to social stimuli.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationFan, Y., & Han, S. (2007) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.023 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Evidence for mirror systems in emotions
Bastiaansen, J. A., Thioux, M., & Keysers, C. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0058 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
“Singer et al. (2004, 2006) subtracted conditions in which subjects receive an electric shock above the tactile threshold from one above the pain Phil.”
BackgroundInfluentialLamm, C., Nusbaum, H. C., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001292 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
“The importance of the OFC in the regulation of empathic responses is also documented by the fMRI results of [9,24] mentioned above, which both required regulation of one’s own emotional evaluation of an aversive situation.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEmpathy for pain and touch in the human somatosensory cortex.
Bufalari, I., Aprile, T., Avenanti, A., Di Russo, F., & Aglioti, S. M. (2007) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl161 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
“In the past few years, however, research has shown the role of shared representations in the domains of pain (Morrison et al. 2004; Singer et al. 2004, 2006; Avenanti et al. 2005, 2006; Botvinick et al. 2005; Jackson et al. 2005; Minio-Paluello et al. 2006; Saarela et al. 2007) and touch (Keysers…”
BackgroundResultThe Neural Correlates of Third-Party Punishment
Buckholtz, J. W., Asplund, C. L., Dux, P. E., Zald, D. H., Gore, J. C., Jones, O. D., & Marois, R. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.016 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
“Recent work has greatly advanced our understanding of how the brain evaluates fairness and makes decisions based on the cooperative status and intentions of others during two-party economic exchanges (de Quervain et al., 2004; Delgado et al., 2005; King-Casas et al., 2005; Knoch et al., 2006; Sanfey et al., 2003; Sing…”
Jean Decety, A. (2011) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06027.x · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Krüeger, F., McCabe, K., Moll, J., Kriegeskorte, N., Zahn, R., Strenziok, M., Heinecke, A., & Grafman, J. H. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0710103104 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Imaging suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a comprehensive review of 2 decades of neuroimaging studies
Schmaal, L., van Harmelen, A.-L., Chatzi, V., Lippard, E. T. C., Toenders, Y. J., Averill, L. A., Mazure, C. M., & Blumberg, H. P. (2020) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0587-x · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Gutsell, J. N., & Inzlicht, M. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.011 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
“Perception–action-coupling, thus, is essential for a number of forms of interpersonal sensitivity, including emotional contagion, empathy, theory of mind (Singer et al., 2006; Vignemont & Singer, 2006) and action and intention 0022-1031/$ - see front matter 2010 Elsevier Inc.”
BackgroundIs emotional contagion special? An fMRI study on neural systems for affective and cognitive empathy
Nummenmaa, L., Hirvonen, J., Parkkola, R., & Hietanen, J. K. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.014 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
“However, a recent study has suggested that at least spontaneous empathetic responses towards disliked versus liked persons are also qualitatively different in males and females (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundNeural basis of extraordinary empathy and altruistic motivation
Mathur, V. A., Harada, T., Lipke, T., & Chiao, J. Y. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.025 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
“, 2004), as well as on subjective judgments of targets made by perceivers (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundGender differences in empathy: The role of the right hemisphere
Rueckert, L. M., & Naybar, N. (2008) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.002 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
“…studies that have reported gender differences in the brain during tasks designed to elicit empathy have suggested than men and women may not differ in overall empathic capacity so much as the types of situations under which empathy is elicited (Fukushima & Hiraki , 2006; Singer et al., 2006).”
Multidimensional assessment of empathic abilities: Neural correlates and gender differences
Derntl, B., Finkelmeyer, A., Eickhoff, S., Kellermann, T., Falkenberg, D. I., Schneider, F., & Habel, U. (2010) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.10.006 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
“This is in line with results from Singer et al. (2006) who report stronger suppression of automatic mirror reactions in response to pain in unfair situations in males than females.”
ResultMirroring others' emotions relates to empathy and interpersonal competence in children
Pfeifer, J. H., Iacoboni, M., Mazziotta, J. C., & Dapretto, M. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.032 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
“…et al., 2003; Dapretto et al., 2006; Lamm et al., 2007; Leslie et al., 2004; Jabbi et al., 2007; Jackson et al., 2006, 2005; Saarela et al., 2006; Singer et al., 2004, 2006; van der Gaag et al., 2007; Wicker et al., 2003) and the model of emotion understanding via action representation proposed…”
BackgroundInfluentialIMAGING VALUATION MODELS IN HUMAN CHOICE
Montague, P. R., King‐Casas, B., & Cohen, J. D. (2006) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112903 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
The origins of altruism in offspring care.
Preston, S. D. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0031755 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
The Right and the Good: Distributive Justice and Neural Encoding of Equity and Efficiency
Hsu, M., Anen, C., & Quartz, S. R. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1153651 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Scope, Evolution and Enhancements
Wagner, J. (2007) · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Attention and reality constraints on the neural processes of empathy for pain.
Gu, X., & Han, S. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.025 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
“Because empathic activity is modulated by social relations between individuals (Singer et al., 2006), participants in the experiment of Singer et al. (2004) might pay attention to their loved ones even though no explicit tasks were assigned to their partners’ pain.”
BackgroundResultEmpathic concern drives costly altruism
FeldmanHall, O., Dalgleish, T., Evans, D., & Mobbs, D. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.043 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
“A further unresolved issue relates to the neural mechanisms supporting these various empathy components and the link to costly altruism (de Vignemont and Singer, 2006).”
How we predict what other people are going to do
Frith, C., & Uta Frith, A. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.126 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
“Singer et al. (2006) used a trust and reciprocity game to create good and bad reputations for two previously unknown partners.”
Self-citationThe Neuroscience of Intergroup Relations
Cikara, M., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614527464 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Genetics of Human Social Behavior
Ebstein, R. P., Israel, S., Chew, S. H., Zhong, S., & Knafo, A. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.020 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Reduced spontaneous but relatively normal deliberate vicarious representations in psychopathy
Meffert, H., Gazzola, V., den Boer, J. A., Bartels, A. A. J., & Keysers, C. (2013) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt190 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
“Those defined using the AAL included the insula and the anterior/mid cingulate (Wicker et al., 2003; Singer et al., 2004, 2006; Jabbi et al., 2007; Bastiaansen et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011).”
Method
- Authors
- Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Wellcome Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Singer, Tania
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 439
- Issue
- 7075
- Pages
- 466-469
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC2636868
- OpenAlex
- W2098425678
- Semantic Scholar
- a9adbab6dae28c23a205786c725a988649d155ef
- Cited by
- 1,726
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 98 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 100
- FWCI
- 139.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (078865)
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- empathy, perceived fairness, social preferences, schadenfreude, altruistic punishment, revenge, sex differences, anterior cingulate cortex, reward processing, economic games, corporal punishment
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Empathy, Female, Game Theory, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Pain, Photic Stimulation, Punishment, Reward, Sex Characteristics, Social Justice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review