Cited by 594Forgiveness and Related BehaviorsEmotions and Moral BehaviorSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Forgivingness, Vengeful Rumination, and Affective Traits

Berry, Jack W., Worthington, Everett L., O'Connor, Lynn E., Parrott, Les, Wade, Nathaniel G.·2005·Journal of Personality

Abstract

Trait forgivingness is the disposition to forgive interpersonal transgressions over time and across situations. We define forgiveness as the replacement of negative unforgiving emotions with positive, other-oriented emotions. Rumination has been suggested as a mediator between forgivingness and emotional outcomes; however, we suggest that different content of rumination leads to different outcomes after transgressions. In four studies of 179, 233, 80, and 66 undergraduate students, trait forgivingness was negatively correlated with trait anger, hostility, neuroticism, fear, and vengeful rumination and was positively correlated with agreeableness, extraversion, and trait empathy. The disposition to ruminate vengefully mediated the relationship between trait forgivingness and (1) anger-related traits and (2) both revenge motivations and state anger following a specific recent transgression, but it did not mediate between forgivingness and (1) fearfulness and (2) avoidance motivations following a specific transgression. Self-hate statements, a proxy for depressive rumination, mediated the relationship between forgivingness and both depression and fearfulness but not the relationship between forgivingness and trait anger. Future research should distinguish the contents of mental rumination following interpersonal transgressions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00308.x

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berry, J. W., Worthington, E. L., O'Connor, L. E., Parrott, L., & Wade, N. G.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Seattle Pacific University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Berry, Jack W.
  • Worthington, Everett L.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12-14
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
183-226
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W2166796639
Cited by
594
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 24
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
interpersonal transgressions, anger, hostility, neuroticism, fear, revenge motivation, avoidance motivation, self-hatred, depressive rumination, empathy, agreeableness, extraversion, emotional characteristics
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Anger, Attitude, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review