The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure.
Abstract
Data from 14 nations reveal IQ gains ranging from 5 to 25 points in a single generation. Some of the largest gains occur on culturally reduced tests and tests of fluid intelligence. The Norwegian data show that a nation can make significant gains on a culturally reduced test while suffering losses on other tests. The Dutch data prove the existence of unknown environmental factors so potent that they account for 15 of the 20 points gained. The hypothesis that best fits the results is that IQ tests do not measure intelligence but rather a correlate with a weak causal link to intelligence. This hypothesis can also explain differential trends on various mental tests, such as the combination of IQ gains and Scholastic Aptitude Test losses in the United States. Over the last decade, scholars in many countries—largely unknown to one another—have been measuring IQ trends from one generation to the next. In this article their results are collected and analyzed so as to reap the benefits comparative data usually yield. It is also argued that this mass of data poses fundamental problems for developmental psychology, primarily concerning what factors have the most potent effect on IQ, what IQ tests measure, and how IQ tests should be used in making between-groups comparisons.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Industrialized nations, while embracing IQ testing in education and employment, have simultaneously experienced a generational rise in IQ scores, a phenomenon known as the Flynn effect (Flynn, 1987(Flynn, , 2011)).”
From Human Intelligence, Creativity, and Wisdom in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as Flynn, 1987
In the citing paper
“Populations’ mean intelligence test scores have been rising since the beginning of the twentieth century.”
From The secular trend of intelligence test scores: The Danish experience for young men born between 1940 and 2000 (2021) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“The data reported by Flynn and others are insufficient to address this question given the limited range of cohorts examined.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Flynn, 1987
In the citing paper
“Of concern to the study and theory of life-span development is the fact that these assertions were based almost exclusively on differences found between two particular cohorts differing approximately 30 years in age—the massive cohort gains are reported for the post-World War II cohort with most data cited pertaining to those born in the 1950s.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Flynn, 1987
Citations
Cites
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children
Miles-Mason, E. (2018) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483392271.n537 · Cited by 4,133
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674433014 · Cited by 3,447
(1980) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 1,935
The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978.
Flynn, J. R. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.29 · Cited by 1,206
Self-citationSTANDARDIZATION OF PROGRESSIVE MATRICES, 1938
RAVEN, J. C. (1941) · British Journal of Medical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1941.tb00316.x · Cited by 389
Social versus reproductive success: The central theoretical problem of human sociobiology
Vining, D. R. (1986) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00021968 · Cited by 326
Race Differences in Intelligence
Bootzin, R. R., Loehlin, J. C., Lindzey, G. E., & Spuhler, J. N. (1976) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421415 · Cited by 307
IQ in Japan and the United States shows a growing disparity
Lynn, R. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/297222a0 · Cited by 256
On the plasticity of intelligence in adulthood and old age: Where Horn and Donaldson fail.
Baltes, P. B., & Schaie, K. W. (1976) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.31.10.720 · Cited by 223
Education and Cognitive Development: The Evidence from Experimental Research
Sharp, D. W., Cole, M., Lave, C., Ginsburg, H. P., Brown, A. L., & French, L. A. (1979) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/3181586 · Cited by 223
(1965) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 204
On the myth of intellectual decline in adulthood.
Horn, J. L., & Donaldson, G. W. (1976) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.31.10.701 · Cited by 167
The rise of national intelligence: Evidence from Britain, Japan and the U.S.A.
Lynn, R., & Hampson, S. L. (1986) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(86)90104-2 · Cited by 161
The fate of national intelligence: test of a thirteen-year prediction.
Cattell, R. B. (1950) · PubMed Central · Cited by 68
Arthur Jensen: Consensus And Controversy
(2005) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203975848 · Cited by 64
Wechsler Intelligence Tests: do we really have a criterion of mental retardation?
Flynn, J. R. (1985) · PubMed · Cited by 63
Self-citationThe intelligence of the Japanese.
Lynn, R. (1977) · Bulletin of the British Psychological Society · Cited by 59
Faith is not enough: A response to the Baltes-Schaie claim that intelligence does not wane.
Horn, J. L., & Donaldson, G. W. (1977) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.32.5.369 · Cited by 58
Comparative Studies of How People Think: An Introduction
Purves, A. C., Cole, M., & Means, B. (1982) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357504 · Cited by 49
Over het intelligentie-onderzoek bij de militaire keuringen vanaf 1925 tot heden
de Leeuw, J., & Meester, A. C. (1984) · Mens en Maatschappij · Cited by 46
IQ GAINS AND THE BINET DECREMENTS
Flynn, J. R. (1984) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb01035.x · Cited by 32
Self-citationSmith, R. S. (1983) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.51.3.414 · Cited by 30
Lippold, S., & Claiborn, J. M. (1983) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.51.2.315 · Cited by 28
Internationales Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium
Kybernetik, R. U. Ö. (1965) · Cited by 26
Schaie, K. W., & Baltes, P. B. (1977) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.32.12.1118 · Cited by 24
The comparability of WAIS and WAIS-R IQs and subtest scores
Mishra, S. P., & Brown, K. H. (1983) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198309)39:5 · Cited by 22
WAIS/WAIS-R: Initial Comparisons
Urbina, S. P., Golden, C. J., & Ariel, R. N. (1982) · NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) · Cited by 17
L‘évolution du niveau intellectuel de la population française pendant le dernier quart de siecle
GIROD, M., & LE LT COLONEL, G. A. (1976) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1976.tb00863.x · Cited by 17
Parker, K. C. H. (2009) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000273048 · Cited by 12
Sociobiology and IQ trends over time
Flynn, J. R. (1986) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00022044 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
WEIRD languages have misled us, too
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1000018x · Cited by 4,177
Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns.
Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J. C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R. J., et al. (1996) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.51.2.77 · Cited by 2,913
Heritability in the genomics era — concepts and misconceptions
Visscher, P. M., Hill, W. G., & Wray, N. R. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2322 · Cited by 1,921
The Raven's Progressive Matrices: Change and Stability over Culture and Time
Raven, J. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0735 · Cited by 1,560
Metadata
- Authors
- Flynn, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Flynn, James R.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-191
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2063679076
- Cited by
- 1,918
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 77
- FWCI
- 38.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2008-09-26)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- IQ gains, fluid intelligence, intelligence testing, Scholastic Aptitude Test, developmental psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
