Cited by 390Psychological Testing and AssessmentCognitive Abilities and TestingPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

STANDARDIZATION OF PROGRESSIVE MATRICES, 1938

RAVEN, JOHN C.·1941·British Journal of Medical Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1941.tb00316.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RAVEN, J. C.
Affiliations
Royal Institution of Great Britain (GB)
Corresponding author
RAVEN, JOHN C.
Venue
British Journal of Medical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1941-09
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
137-150
ISSN
0007-1129 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011532375
Cited by
389
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Medical Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Raven's Progressive Matrices, standardization, intelligence testing, nonverbal intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review