Cited by 481Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsCareer Development and Diversity

A new perspective on women's math achievement.

Kimball, Meredith M.·1989·Psychological Bulletin

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.198

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kimball, M. M.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Kimball, Meredith M.
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1989-03
Volume
105
Issue
2
Pages
198-214
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W1976873131
Cited by
481
References
123
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
14.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
gender differences in mathematics, sex differences, mathematics achievement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review