Cited by 83Education, Achievement, and GiftednessGrit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationEarly Childhood Education and Development

Will not want: Self-control rather than motivation explains the female advantage in report card grades

Open access
Duckworth, Angela L., Shulman, Elizabeth P., Mastronarde, Andrew J., Patrick, Sarah D., Zhang, Jinghui, Druckman, Jeremy·2015·Learning and Individual Differences

Abstract

Girls earn better grades than boys, but the mechanism explaining this gender difference is not well understood. We examined the relative importance of self-control and motivation in explaining the female advantage in grades. In Study 1, we surveyed middle school teachers and found they judged girls to be higher in both school motivation and self-control. In Studies 2 and 3-using self-reported motivation and teacher- and/or parent-reported self-control, and quarterly and final grades obtained from school records-we find that self-control, but not school motivation, helps to explain the gender gap in academic performance. In these studies, girls appeared to be more self-controlled than boys, but-contrary to teacher judgments in Study 1-did not appear to be more motivated to do well in school.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.02.006

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most research on the female advantage in school grades has examined gender differences in self-discipline, and none to date have considered gender differences in sleep as a mediating factor on school grades.

    “Most of the research conducted to understand this female advantage in school grades has examined gender differences in self-discipline,40–42 and none to date have considered gender differences in sleep as a mediating factor on school grades.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duckworth, A. L., Shulman, E. P., Mastronarde, A. J., Patrick, S. D., Zhang, J., & Druckman, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Brock University (CA)
  • Smith College (US)
Corresponding author
Duckworth, Angela L.
Venue
Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
39
Pages
13-23
ISSN
1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067608907
Cited by
83
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R24AG048081, K01AG033182)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
gender differences in achievement, self-control, academic motivation, report card grades, girls' academic performance, teacher judgment, junior high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review