Cited by 621Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCareer Development and DiversitySocial and Intergroup Psychology

Female role models: protecting women's math test performance

Marx, David M., Roman, Jasmin S.·2002·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Recent theory and research suggest that certain situational factors can harm women’s math test performance. The three studies presented here indicate that female role models can buffer women’s math test performance from the debilitating effects of these situational factors. In Study 1, women’s math test performance was protected when a competent female experimenter (i.e., a female role model) administered the test. Study 2 showed that it was the perception of the female experimenter’s math competence, not her physical presence, that safeguarded the math test performance of women. Study 3 revealed that learning about a competent female experimenter buffered women’s self-appraised math ability, which in turn led to successful performance on a challenging math test.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01461672022812004

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Female role models' effectiveness comes in part because they demonstrate that success in the stereotyped domain is attainable, increase social belonging, and inoculate people's sense of self against identity threats.

    “The effectiveness of these women comes, in part, because they demonstrate that success in the stereotyped domain is attainable, and the models can both increase a sense of social belonging and inoculate people's sense of self against identity threats (Dasgupta, 2011;Marx, Ko, & Friedman, 2009;Marx & Roman, 2002;McGlone, Aronson, & Kobrynowicz, 2006).”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Marx & Roman, 2002

  • Female role models can protect women from threats to their identity in leadership roles.

    “In particular, female role models can play an important role in protecting women from threats to their identity in leadership roles.”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Marx & Roman, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marx, D. M., & Roman, J. S.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Marx, David M.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2002-09
Volume
28
Issue
9
Pages
1183-1193
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2074613632
Cited by
621
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 27
FWCI
11.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
female role models, gender stereotypes, perceived competence, situational factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review