Attributions in marriage: Review and critique.
Abstract
The prevailing behavioral account of marriage must be expanded to include covert processes. This article therefore examines the attributions or explanations that spouses make for marital events. A review indicates that dissatisfied spouses, compared with satisfied spouses, make attributions for the partner's behavior that cast it in a negative light. Experimental, clinical outcome, and longitudinal data suggest further that attributions may influence marital satisfaction. Rival hypotheses for these findings are examined. Because continued empirical development in this domain depends on conceptual progress, a framework is presented that integrates attributions, behavior, and marital satisfaction. This framework points to several topics that require systematic study, and specific hypotheses are offered for research on these topics. It is concluded that the promising start made toward understanding marital attributions holds considerable potential for enriching behavioral conceptions of marriage.
Cites (6)
- An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotionWeiner, Bernard · 1985 · Psychological Review
- Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.Abramson, Lyn Y., Seligman, Martin E., Teasdale, John D. · 1978 · Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perceptionJones, Edward E., Davis, Keith E. · 1965 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Trust in close relationships.Rempel, John K., Holmes, John G., Zanna, Mark P. · 1985 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Marital interaction: Physiological linkage and affective exchange.Levenson, Robert W., Gottman, John M. · 1983 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- On causality, responsibility, and self-blame: a theoretical noteShaver, Kelly G., Drown, Debra · 1986 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (19)
- Marital conflict and children's adjustment: A cognitive-contextual framework.Grych, John H., Fincham, Frank D. · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
- The benefits of positive illusions: idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships.Murray, Sandra L., Holmes, John G., Griffin, Dale W. · 1996 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- The Relationship Context of Human Behavior and DevelopmentReis, Harry T., Collins, W. Andrew, Berscheid, Ellen · 2000 · Psychological Bulletin
- Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships.Agnew, Christopher R., Van Lange, Paul A. M., Rusbult, Caryl E., Langston, Christopher A. · 1998 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Empirically Supported Couple and Family Interventions for Marital Distress and Adult Mental Health ProblemsBaucom, Donald H., Shoham, Varda, Mueser, Kim T., Daiuto, Anthony D., Stickle, Timothy R. · 1998 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.107.1.3
- The paper
- Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.107.1.3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.