The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: a meta-analysis
Abstract
A meta-analytic integration reviews evidence for deindividuation theory as an explanation of collective and antinormative behavior. Deindividuation theories propose a subjective deindividuated state that causes transgression of general social norms. Deindividuation research classically manipulates anonymity, self-awareness, and group size. Results of 60 independent studies showed little support for (a) the occurrence of deindividuated (antinormative) behaviors or (b) the existence of a deindividuated state. Research results were explained mon adequately by situation-specific than by general social norms. Analyses indicated that groups and individuals conform more to situation-specific norms when they are "deindividuated." These findings are inconsistent with deindividuation theory but support a social identity model of deindividuation effects.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Greater anonymity is associated with disinhibition and aggressive behavior-potentially because anonymity reduces accountability and thereby licenses bad behavior [12,13].”
From Two social lives: how differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes (2020) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“Greater anonymity is associated with disinhibition and aggressive behavior-potentially because anonymity reduces accountability and thereby licenses bad behavior [12,13].”
From Two social lives: how differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes (2020) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,626
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory.
Willer, D., Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2073157 · Cited by 7,207
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0046408 · Cited by 4,819
THE MORAL ECONOMY OF THE ENGLISH CROWD IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
Thompson, E. P. (1971) · Past and Present · doi:10.1093/past/50.1.76 · Cited by 4,736
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory.
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076760 · Cited by 3,728
Sex Differences in Social Behavior
Eagly, A. H. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203781906 · Cited by 3,440
(1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,635
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 112 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 663
Royen, K. V., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., & Adam, P. C. G. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.040 · Cited by 84
“Finally, anonymity is a major factor in determining antinormative behavior (Christopherson, 2007; Postmes & Spears, 1998; Suler, 2004).”
BackgroundBaray, G., Postmes, T., & Jetten, J. (2009) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466608x389582 · Cited by 80
“The logical consequence is that people’s behaviour in such contexts becomes more responsive to group norms (rather than less responsive as would be argued by traditional deindividuation theories; Postmes & Spears 1998).”
BackgroundGroup Emotional Contagion and Complaint Intentions in Group Service Failure
Du, J., Fan, X., & Feng, T. (2014) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670513519290 · Cited by 77
“Through a meta-analysis, Postmes and Spears (1998) provide support for the positive effect of group size on the deindividuation effect (i.e., more irrational behaviors occur in a larger group).”
BackgroundSassenberg, K., Boos, M., & Rabung, S. (2005) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.254 · Cited by 77
Cinnirella, M., & Green, B. (2006) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.009 · Cited by 79
Self-Awareness and Constructive Functioning: Revisiting “the Human Dilemma”
Silvia, P. J., & O’Brien, M. E. (2004) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.23.4.475.40307 · Cited by 76
“Research on deindividuation illustrates how self-awareness can restrain antisocial impulses ( Postmes & Spears, 1998 ).”
BackgroundA Meta-Analytic Review of Moral Disengagement and Cyberbullying
Zhao, L., & Yu, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.681299 · Cited by 96
Stromer‐Galley, J., Bryant, L., & Bimber, B. (2015) · Journal of Deliberative Democracy · doi:10.16997/jdd.218 · Cited by 75
“The implications for disagreement expressions given the theories of SIP and SIDE are unclear, however.”
BackgroundInfluentialReinig, B. A., & Mejías, R. J. (2004) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496404266773 · Cited by 72
“Postmes and Spears (1998) examined 60 studies in a meta-analysis on deindividuation and antinormative behaviors and concluded that the relationship between deindividuation and anti-normative behavior was equivocal.”
BackgroundOutsider Privileges Can Lead to Insider Disadvantages: Some Psychosocial Aspects of Ableism
Dunn, D. S. (2019) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12331 · Cited by 71
The Role of Police Perceptions and Practices in the Development of “Public Disorder”1,2
Drury, J., Stott, C., & Farsides, T. (2003) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01959.x · Cited by 71
Not Just a Name: The Moderating Effect of Online Identity on Herding
Jiang, Y., Ho, Y., Yan, X., & Tan, Y. (2019) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2021.1049 · Cited by 69
The five W’s of “bullying” on Twitter: Who, What, Why, Where, and When
Bellmore, A. D., Calvin, A. J., Xu, J., & Zhu, X. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.052 · Cited by 70
“Privacy of tweets may elicit users to disclose themselves in more stigmatized roles (i.e., bully or assistant) or increase cyberbullying, especially if users are anonymous and/or their followers are strangers (Kowalski et al., 2014; Postmes & Spears, 1998; Whittaker & Kowalski, 2015).”
BackgroundPlatow, M. J., Mavor, K. I., & Grace, D. M. (2012) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9227-4
Attitude Change in Computer-Mediated Communication: Effects of Anonymity and Category Norms
Sassenberg, K., & Boos, M. (2003) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302030064006 · Cited by 70
Chan, T. K. H., Cheung, C. M. K., Benbasat, I., Xiao, B. S., & Lee, Z. W. Y. (2022) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2022.1161 · Cited by 73
“Experienced anonymity enabled by SNSs lowers the threshold of self-evaluation and the standard for self-regulatory behaviors because bystanders are no longer being seen or identified by their interaction partners (Postmes and Spears 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialReduced self-referential neural response during intergroup competition predicts competitor harm
Cikara, M., Jenkins, A. C., Dufour, N., & Saxe, R. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.080 · Cited by 67
“So far, research examining this third mechanism remains scant due to the difficulty ofmeasuring the accessibility of individuals' moral standards (Postmes and Spears, 1998).”
InfluentialAn Integrative Theory Addressing Cyberharassment in the Light of Technology-Based Opportunism
Lowry, P. B., Zhang, J., Moody, G. D., Chatterjee, S., Wang, C., & Wu, T. (2019) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2019.1661090 · Cited by 68
Ju, D., Qin, X., Xu, M., & DiRenzo, M. S. (2016) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-015-9455-7 · Cited by 71
Cat-Calls and Culpability: Investigating the Frequency and Functions of Stranger Harassment
Wesselmann, E. D., & Kelly, J. R. (2010) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9830-2 · Cited by 66
“The group context is likely to have permissive norms regarding stranger harassment and give members a sense of anonymity that should increase adherence to this normative behavior (see Postmes and Spears 1998 ).”
BackgroundAakhus, M. A., & Rumsey, E. (2010) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909880903483581 · Cited by 65
“Indeed, mediated contexts appear to heighten, not reduce, the importance of group norms for individual behavior and group norms promote conformity in online behavior (Postmes & Spears, 1998; Postmes, Spears, & Lea, 2000).”
BackgroundKeipi, T., & Oksanen, A. (2014) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2014.881988 · Cited by 64
“Strong research evidence points out that anonymity enhances conformity in the group to group norms, showing that online anonymity can actually enhance peer pressure while simultaneously allowing for greater autonomy, a positive relationship between risk and opportunity (Postmes and Spears 1998).”
BackgroundObermaier, M., Schmuck, D., & Saleem, M. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448211017527 · Cited by 80
“Also, since users are mostly non-visible (Postmes and Spears, 1998), haters do not get an immediate and full reaction of how hate speech affects minority members and breaks social norms, which could contribute to a lower inhibition threshold for verbal attacks (Suler, 2004).”
BackgroundExamining the antecedents of online disinhibition
Wu, S., Lin, T., & Shih, J.-F. (2017) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-07-2015-0167 · Cited by 81
Schumpeter's Leadership Democracy
Mackie, G. L. (2009) · Political Theory · doi:10.1177/0090591708326642 · Cited by 72
Stott, C., Ho, L. K.-K., Radburn, M., Chan, Y.-T., Kyprianides, A., & Saavedra, P. (2020) · Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice · doi:10.1093/police/paaa073 · Cited by 66
Campbell, J., & Stasser, G. L. (2006) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496406288976 · Cited by 59
Self-regulation and its failure: The seven deadly threats to self-regulation.
Wagner, D. D., & Heatherton, T. F. (2014) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/14341-026 · Cited by 66
“This research has led to the view that deindividuation effects may largely be due to people assuming a group identity, which comes with new norms and standards for behavior (Postmes & Spears, 1998; Reicher, Spears, & Postmes, 1995).”
BackgroundAntecedents and consequences of excessive online social gaming: a social learning perspective
Gong, X., Zhang, K. Z. K., Chen, C., Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. (2019) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-03-2018-0138 · Cited by 58
Group identification as a mediator of the effect of players’ anonymity on cheating in online games
Chen, V., & Wu, Y. (2015) · Behavior and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2013.843721 · Cited by 51
“Previous studies based on SIDE demonstrate that individuals tend to act according to perceived group norms and expectations when social group identity is salient and fellow group members are deindividuated in computer-mediated groups (Chan, 2010; Postmes & Spears, 1998; Postmes et al., 2001).”
MethodPhillips, G., Turner, B., Salamanca, P., Birkett, M. A., Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Newcomb, M. E., Marro, R. L., & Mustanski, B. S. (2017) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.040 · Cited by 58
“Cyberbullying has an aspect of perceived anonymity for its perpetrators, which results in deindividuation and reduced opportunities for sympathy and remorse (Kowalski et al., 2014; Postmes and Spears, 1998).”
BackgroundCronin, P., & Reicher, S. D. (2006) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466605x41364 · Cited by 56
Weger, H., & Aakhus, M. A. (2003) · Argumentation and Advocacy · doi:10.1080/00028533.2003.11821595 · Cited by 55
Konrath, S. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2211-1.ch012 · Cited by 55
“In other words, the situation of being anonymous is compelling, and can cause a disinhibited state called “deindividuation” that can be potentially harmful to others (Kiesler & Sproull, 1992; Postmes & Spears, 1998; Weicher, 2006).”
BackgroundSchumann, S., Klein, O., Douglas, K. M., & Hewstone, M. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.006 · Cited by 62
De menselijke beslisser : Over de psychologie van keuze en gedrag
Prast, H. M., Thomas, C. A., Tiemeijer, W. L., & Regeringsbele, W. R. V. H. (2009) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.5117/9789089642028 · Cited by 53
Human collective reactions to threat
Dezecache, G. (2015) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1344 · Cited by 57
Football hooliganism: comparing self‐awareness and social identity theory explanations
Hiel, A. V., Hautman, L., Cornelis, I., & Clercq, B. J. D. (2007) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.902 · Cited by 53
“In a meta-analytic study, Postmes and Spears (1998) concluded that the available evidence generally supports the social identity model of deindividuation (Reicher, 1987; Reicher et al.”
BackgroundFight the power: Lanchester's laws of combat in human evolution
JOHNSON, D. D. P., & MacKay, N. (2014) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.11.001 · Cited by 55
“…in their abilities, to engage in status competition, and to succumb to in-group/out-group thinking and feelings of superiority, narcissism, and aggression (Baumeister & Boden, 1998; Goleman, 1989; Janis, 1972; Postmes & Spears, 1998; Van Vugt, De Cremer, & Janssen, 2007; Wrangham & Wilson, 2004).”
BackgroundInternet use and verbal aggression: The moderating role of parents and peers
Appel, M., Stiglbauer, B., Batinic, B., & Holtz, P. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.007 · Cited by 55
Peers and offender decision‐making
Hoeben, E. M., & Thomas, K. J. (2019) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12462 · Cited by 52
“Research in social psychology has shown that the presence of others decreases individual’s (public) self-awareness and enhances feelings of anonymity (Diener, 1976; Festinger et al., 1952; Postmes & Spears, 1998; Prentice-Dunn & Rogers, 1982).”
Intra‐group interaction and the development of norms which promote inter‐group hostility
Smith, L. G. E., & Postmes, T. (2007) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.464 · Cited by 53
“More commonly, people attend to more local (emergent) in-group norms, which may on occasion deviate sharply from general social standards (Postmes & Spears, 1998).”
Social Media Is Polarized, Social Media Is Polarized
Nelimarkka, M., Laaksonen, S.-M., & Semaan, B. (2018) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3196709.3196764 · Cited by 60
Measuring Perceived Anonymity: The Development of a Context Independent Instrument
Hite, D. M., Voelker, T. A., & Robertson, A. (2014) · Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences · doi:10.2458/jmm.v5i1.18305 · Cited by 51
Rimé, B., & Páez, D. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221146388 · Cited by 76
“However, opposite to the hypothesis that deindi-viduation decreases self-control and diminishes responsiveness to the situation, a meta-analytic review indicated that under deindividuating conditions, participants behaved more in accord with situational norms (Postmes & Spears, 1998).”
BackgroundMcGregor, I., Hayes, J., & Prentice, M. S. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01325 · Cited by 64
“…extremes of bolstering the self by joining ARR groups (Fritsche et al., 2013; Swann and Buhrmester, 2015), and de-individuated escaping of the self by Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 9 September 2015 | Volume 6 | Article 1325 cleaving to group authority (Postmes and Spears, 1998).”
BackgroundPredictors of Protest Among Anti‐Globalization Demonstrators1
Cameron, J. E., & Nickerson, S. L. (2009) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00458.x · Cited by 50
The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication
Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2000) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/26.3.341 · Cited by 557
“Moreover, there is no relationship between flaming and self-awareness, the construct supposedly underlying deindividuation (Postmes & Spears, 1998).”
BackgroundMethodA Cognitive Three-Process Model of Computer-Mediated Group Interaction
Whitworth, B., Gallupe, B., & McQueen, R. (2000) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1023/a:1008780324737 · Cited by 51
Kubiszewski, V., Fontaine, R., Huré, K., & Rüsch, E. (2012) · L Encéphale · doi:10.1016/j.encep.2012.01.008 · Cited by 48
Stott, C., & Drury, J. (2016) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662516639872 · Cited by 48
The prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization among homosexual men
Krahé, B., Schütze, S., Fritsche, I., & Waizenhöfer, E. (2000) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224490009552031 · Cited by 48
Do internet-based surveys increase personal self-disclosure?
Hanna, R. C., Weinberg, B. D., Dant, R. P., & Berger, P. D. (2005) · Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management · doi:10.1057/palgrave.dbm.3240270 · Cited by 48
Leander, N. P., Agostini, M., Stroebe, W., Kreienkamp, J., Spears, R., Kuppens, T., van Zomeren, M., Otten, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000190 · Cited by 49
“Although societal norms may commonly devalue violence, various subcultures may endorse norms for masculinity, frontier justice, and retribution, that value the use of violent means of action (Postmes & Spears, 1998; Sherif, 1936).”
Empirical analysis of online anonymity and user behaviors: the impact of real name policy
Cho, D., Kim, S., & Acquisti, A. (2012) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2012.241 · Cited by 46
“According to classical deindividuation theory, anonymity in the group can lead to reduced self-awareness and influence of social norms that ultimately correspond to anti-normative behaviors [30].”
BackgroundHakonen, M., & Lipponen, J. (2008) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0070-3 · Cited by 46
“This is, in fact, understandable in light of the social identity model of depersonalization effects (SIDE; Reicher, Spears, & Postmes, 1995; Postmes & Spears, 1998), which distinguishes between personal and group identity.”
BackgroundSchippers, M. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Joffe, A. R. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.950965 · Cited by 51
Nonverbal robot-group interaction using an imitated gaze cue
Kirchner, N., Alempijevic, A., & Dissanayake, G. (2011) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/1957656.1957824 · Cited by 45
“Introducing additional social and contextual cues is likely to reduce the presentation of this behaviour by individualising a member of the group [6, 10, 28].”
BackgroundInfluentialA social mind: The context of John Turner’s work and its influence
Reicher, S. D., Haslam, S. A., Spears, R., & Reynolds, K. J. (2012) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2012.745672 · Cited by 56
“A similar argument can be made for a range of core group processes from work on deindividuation (Reicher, 1987; Postmes & Spears, 1998) to research into a range of stereotyping effects (e.g., illusory correlation, outgroup homogeneity; e.g., see Haslam et al., 1996; McGarty, 2012; Oakes et al.,…”
BackgroundUsing avatars to tailor ideation process to innovation strategy
Stéphanie Buisine, A., Guegan, J., Barré, J., Segonds, F., & Aoussat, A. (2016) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-016-0378-y · Cited by 45
“Moreover, in situations of anonymity and dein-dividuation (Postmes and Spears 1998) like in a virtual world, self-perception reliance on identity cues (and therefore on avatar’s appearance) is enhanced (see Yee et al. 2009).”
Lantz, B. (2021) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260518786497 · Cited by 44
“Postmes and Spears (1998) conducted a meta-analysis and found that in contexts that would produce deindividuation (e.g., larger groups), groups seem to establish local group-specific norms.”
BackgroundDemetriou, C. (2003) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/43.1.213 · Cited by 44
“A sizeable number of studies has demonstrated that individuals who believe their identity is unknown are more likely to behave in an aggressive and punitive manner (e.g. Diener et al. 1976; Ellison et al. 1995; Rehm et al. 1987; Postmes and Spears 1998).”
BackgroundDynamic Social Impact and the Evolution of Social Representations: A Natural History of Stereotypes
Schaller, M., & Latané, B. (1996) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01506.x · Cited by 47
Ognibene, D., Wilkens, R., Taibi, D., Hernández‐Leo, D., Kruschwitz, U., Donabauer, G., Theophilou, E., Lomonaco, F., Buršić, S., Lobo, R. A., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.654930 · Cited by 57
“, 1999) often exasperates carelessness and misbehaviours, as the users perceive themselves as anonymous (Diener et al., 1980; Postmes and Spears, 1998), and do not feel judged or exposed (Whittaker and Kowalski, 2015).”
BackgroundThe Social Identity Perspective on Small Groups
Abrams, D., Hogg, M. A., Hinkle, S., & Otten, S. (2005) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483328935.n4 · Cited by 42
Leading for gold: social identity leadership processes at the London 2012 Olympic Games
Slater, M. J., Barker, J. B., Coffee, P., & Jones, M. V. (2014) · Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health · doi:10.1080/2159676x.2014.936030 · Cited by 43
“In social identity terms, team values refer to the content of social identity (Postmes and Spears 1998, Turner 1999).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSleep Deprivation Impairs and Caffeine Enhances My Performance, but Not Always Our Performance
Faber, N. S., Häusser, J. A., & Kerr, N. L. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868315609487 · Cited by 46
"They basically like destroyed the school one day"
Singh, V. K., Radford, M. L., Huang, Q., & Furrer, S. (2017) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2998181.2998279 · Cited by 41
Players who play to make others cry
Chen, V. H. H., Duh, H. B., & Ng, C. W. (2009) · International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE) · doi:10.1145/1690388.1690454 · Cited by 43
Prejudice on the stage: Self‐monitoring and the public expression of group attitudes
Klein, O., Snyder, M., & Livingston, R. W. (2004) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/0144666041501697 · Cited by 42
“This finding is consistent with the recent literature on deindividuation (Postmes & Spears, 1998; Reicher, Spears, & Postmes, 1995).”
ResultSocial Identity Model of Deindividuation Effects
Spears, R. (2017) · The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects · doi:10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0091 · Cited by 45
Brogaard, B. “. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190084448.001.0001 · Cited by 53
The Effects of Avatar Appearance in Virtual Worlds
Merola, N. A., & Peña, J. F. (1970) · Journal of Virtual Worlds Research · doi:10.4101/jvwr.v2i5.843 · Cited by 41
Cyberbullying among Youth with and without Disabilities
Kowalski, R. M., & Toth, A. (2017) · Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma · doi:10.1007/s40653-017-0139-y · Cited by 41
“Believing that they are anonymous online, people may say and do things that they would not say or do in face-to-face interactions (Diener 1980; Kowalski et al. 2014; Postmes and Spears 1998).”
BackgroundWorkplace cyberbullying and bystander helping behaviour
Madden, C., & Loh, J. M. I. (2018) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2018.1449130 · Cited by 44
The neuroscience of intergroup threat and violence
Lantos, D., & Molenberghs, P. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.025 · Cited by 40
A self-novelty manipulation of self-focused attention for Internet and laboratory experiments
Silvia, P. J., & Eichstaedt, J. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03195578 · Cited by 41
“Interaction via computers does not necessarily lower inhibitions and increase deindividuation ( Postmes & Spears, 1998 ).”
BackgroundPerceiving and Confronting Sexism
Wang, K., & Dovidio, J. F. (2016) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684316670628 · Cited by 40
“…to the social costs for deviating from those expectations, when they feel more personally identifiable; by contrast, when social identity is salient, people conform more strongly to the norms and expectations of members of that social group (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004; Postmes & Spears, 1998).”
Anonymity effects in computer-mediated communication in the case of minority influence
Toranzo, F. M., Ortiz, J., & Jacinto, L. G. (2005) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.09.002 · Cited by 39
“The most outstanding theoretical study supporting the principles of this model is the meta-analysis on deindividuation and antinormative behavior carried out by Postmes and Spears (1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialAn Empirical Assessment of Meta-Analytic Practice
Dieckmann, N. F., Malle, B. F., & Bodner, T. (2009) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015107 · Cited by 40
“Two meta-analyses that could serve as a model for future meta-analysts are by Postmes and Spears (1998) and Tenenbaum and Leaper (2002).”
Method(Mis)imagining the good life and the bad life: Envy and pity as a function of the focusing illusion
O’Brien, E., Kristal, A. C., Ellsworth, P. C., & Schwarz, N. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.002 · Cited by 40
“…psychology highlights how broader category knowledge can lead perceivers to ignore a person's individuating features (e.g., stereotypes: Ames, 2004; Postmes & Spears, 1998) and/or assume these features are uniformly consistent with the category (e.g., halo effects: Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Wills,…”
BackgroundMotivations behind catcalling: exploring men’s engagement in street harassment behaviour
Walton, K. A., & Pedersen, C. L. (2021) · Psychology and Sexuality · doi:10.1080/19419899.2021.1909648 · Cited by 39
“The presence of other ingroup members also contributes to men’s sexual harassment proclivity due to the anonymity provided (Postmes & Spears, 1998; see also Gardner, 1995); groups that offer high anonymity to their members and that have harassment-tolerant norms create an environment where an…”
BackgroundThe Effect of Topic of Discussion on Gendered Language in Computer-Mediated Communication Discussion
Thomson, R. (2006) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x06286452 · Cited by 39
Group rationale, collective sense: Beyond intergroup bias
Spears, R. (2010) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466609x481308 · Cited by 38
Visual spaces, norm governed places: the influence of spatial context online
Stromer‐Galley, J., & Martey, R. M. (2009) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444809336555 · Cited by 37
“…(SIDE) theorizes that in the relatively anonymous, or deindividuated, context of text-only computer-mediated communication, individuals will orient more strongly to the group and its norms when a group identity is salient (Postmes and Spears, 1998; Postmes et al., 1998; Spears and Lea, 1994).”
BackgroundUsing Empirical Data to Reason about Internet Research Ethics
Hudson, J. M., & Bruckman, A. S. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-4023-7_15 · Cited by 37
“…induced by online environments cause individuals to act as if public spaces were private (Bassett & O'Riordan, 2002; Binik et al., 1999; Hudson & Bruckman, 2004a; Joinson, 2003; Kiesler et al., 1984; Matheson & Zanna, 1988; Postmes & Spears, 1998; Reid, 1996; Wallace, 1999; Walther, 1996).”
BackgroundMummendey, A., & Otten, S. (2003) · doi:10.1002/9780470693421.ch6 · Cited by 38
Being positively moved by climate protest predicts peaceful collective action
Landmann, H., & Naumann, J. L. (2024) · Global Environmental Psychology · doi:10.5964/gep.11113 · Cited by 43
“Although the notion of deindividuation has been falsified multiple times (see Postmes & Spears, 1998, for a review), it is possible that participation in large groups elicits positive ecstatic emotions that motivate extreme actions.”
BackgroundBarker, J. B., Evans, A. L., Coffee, P., Slater, M. J., & McCarthy, P. J. (2014) · The Sport Psychologist · doi:10.1123/tsp.2013-0042 · Cited by 37
Restoring Agency to the Human Actor
Swann, W. B., & Jetten, J. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616679464 · Cited by 43
“The findings from this study were so compelling that they prompted researchers to revisit and reevaluate their understanding of the nature, causes, and consequences of crowd behavior (see Postmes & Spears, 1998).”
BackgroundSocial media reduce users' moral sensitivity: Online shaming as a possible consequence
Ge, X. (2020) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21904 · Cited by 37
Improving Civil Gang Injunctions
Hennigan, K. M., & Sloane, D. C. (2013) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12000 · Cited by 41
“Social identity theorists elaborate on the sense of anonymity that increases behavior consistent with the norms of a group with which a person is strongly identified (Hennigan and Spanovic, 2012; Postmes and Spears, 1998).”
Amiot, C. E., Sansfaçon, S., & Louis, W. R. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2006 · Cited by 37
Asada, A., & Ko, Y. J. (2019) · Journal of Sport Management · doi:10.1123/jsm.2018-0362 · Cited by 41
da Costa, S., Páez, D., Martí-González, M., Díaz, V., & Bouchat, P. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1096877 · Cited by 40
Generating Agreement in Computer-Mediated Groups
Whitworth, B., Gallupe, B., & McQueen, R. (2001) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640103200506 · Cited by 34
“And, some studies report that CMC groups generate more consensus than FTF groups (Lea & Spears, 1991; Postmes & Spears, 1998).”
BackgroundIdentified Employee Surveys: Potential Promise, Perils, and Professional Practice Guidelines
Saari, L. M., & Scherbaum, C. A. (2011) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01369.x · Cited by 34
“For example, Spears and colleagues’ (Postmes & Spears, 1998; Reicher, Spears, & Postmes, 1995a,b; Spears & Lea, 1994) social identity model of deindividuation effects suggests a number of psychological factors that may impact perceptions and behaviors in the context of an identified survey.”
BackgroundExamining the presentation of self in popular blogs: a cultural perspective
Chen, Y.-N. K. (2010) · Chinese Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/17544750903528773 · Cited by 34
“While one may suspect that this refrainment from revealing personal and contact information reflects a desire for a deindividuated state, and thus disinhibition of one’s behavior on the Internet (Postmes & Spears, 1998), the fact that over half of them posted personal photos on the blogs seems to point to a reluctance…”
BackgroundInfluentialPower and Legitimizing Ideologies in Hierarchy‐Enhancing vs. Hierarchy‐Attenuating Environments
Oliveira, P. D., Guimond, S., & Dambrun, M. (2012) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00909.x · Cited by 33
The underlying social identities of a nation's brand
Lee, R., Klobas, J. E., Tezinde, T., & Jamie Murphy, A. (2010) · International Marketing Review · doi:10.1108/02651331011058608 · Cited by 33
“As social identity increases, personal identity decreases, a notion termed depersonalisation (Postmes and Spears, 1998; Turner et al., 1987).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Postmes, T., & Spears, R.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 238-259
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2031296644
- Cited by
- 667
- References
- 112
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 37.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- deindividuation, social norms, anonymity, self-awareness, group size, social identity model, collective behavior, conformity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review