Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality.

Abstract

Growing cross-cultural evidence suggests that East Asians are less likely to show the correspondence bias, or a preference for explanations of behavior in terms of traits, dispositions, or other internal attributes of the target. The scope of this evidence spans several research paradigms and diverse methodologies. The cultural difference, however, appears not to be caused by an absence of dispositional thinking in East Asian cultures. Indeed, extensive ethnographic and psychological data indicate that "dispositionism" is a cross-culturally widespread mode of thinking, although East Asians believe dispositions to be more malleable and have a more holistic conception of the person as being situated in a broad social context. The East-West split in attribution thus originates primarily from a stronger "situationism" or belief in the importance of the context of behavior in East Asia. Consequently, East Asians are more likely than Westerners to avoid the correspondence bias as long as situational constraints are salient.

Cites (12)

1. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
   Markus, Hazel R., Kitayama, Shinobu · 1991 · Psychological Review
2. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
   Nisbett, Richard E., Wilson, Timothy D. · 1977 · Psychological Review
3. From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
   Jones, Edward E., Davis, Keith E. · 1965 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
4. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance.
   Festinger, Leon, Carlsmith, James M. · 1959 · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
5. The correspondence bias.
   Gilbert, Daniel T., Malone, Patrick S. · 1995 · Psychological Bulletin
6. The attribution of attitudes
   Jones, Edward E, Harris, Victor A · 1967 · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
7. Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events.
   Morris, Michael W., Peng, Kaiping · 1994 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
8. Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies.
   Latane, Bibb, Darley, John M. · 1968 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
9. A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception.
   Reeder, Glenn D., Brewer, Marilynn B. · 1979 · Psychological Review
10. Situational Salience and Cultural Differences in the Correspondence Bias and Actor-Observer Bias
    Choi, Incheol, Nisbett, Richard E. · 1998 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Show all 12 references

Cited by (48)

1. The weirdest people in the world?
   Henrich, Joseph, Heine, Steven J., Norenzayan, Ara · 2010 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
2. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.
   Oyserman, Daphna, Coon, Heather M., Kemmelmeier, Markus · 2002 · Psychological Bulletin
3. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition.
   Nisbett, Richard E., Peng, Kaiping, Choi, Incheol, Norenzayan, Ara · 2001 · Psychological Review
4. Individualism-collectivism and personality
   Triandis, Harry C. · 2001 · Journal of Personality
5. Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition.
   Hong, Ying-yi, Morris, Michael W., Chiu, Chi-yue, Benet-Martínez, Verónica · 2000 · American Psychologist

See all 1,055