Cited by 2,203Cultural Differences and ValuesSocial and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition.

Hong, Ying-yi, Morris, Michael W., Chiu, Chi-yue, Benet-Martínez, Verónica·2000·American Psychologist

Abstract

The authors present a new approach to culture and cognition, which focuses on the dynamics through which specific pieces of cultural knowledge (implicit theories) become operative in guiding the construction of meaning from a stimulus. Whether a construct comes to the fore in a perceiver's mind depends on the extent to which the construct is highly accessible (because of recent exposure). In a series of cognitive priming experiments, the authors simulated the experience of bicultural individuals (people who have internalized two cultures) of switching between different cultural frames in response to culturally laden symbols. The authors discuss how this dynamic, constructivist approach illuminates (a) when cultural constructs are potent drivers of behavior and (b) how bicultural individuals may control the cognitive effects of culture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.55.7.709

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biculturals move between their two cultural orientations by engaging in cultural frame switching.

    “Further evidence for the idea that individuals can simultaneously hold two or more cultural orientations is provided by recent sociocognitive experimental work showing that biculturals move between their two cultural orientations by engaging in cultural frame switching (Hong, Morris, Chiu, & Benet-Martı´nez, 2000), or shifting between different culturally based interpretative lenses in response to”

    From Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and Psychosocial Antecedents (2005) · cites this paper as Hong, Morris, Chiu, & Benet-Martı´nez, 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, Y.-Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C.-Y., & Benet-Martínez, V.
Affiliations
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2000
Volume
55
Issue
7
Pages
709-720
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W4250148132
Cited by
2,203
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 182 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 111 · 2015: 117 · 2014: 128 · 2013: 115 · 2012: 106
FWCI
46.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
multiculturalism, culture and cognition, constructivism, cultural diversity, cognitive development, cross-cultural psychology
MeSH terms
Acculturation, Adult, Asian, Cognition, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Symbolism, Cultural Diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review