The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Construct of Work Commitment: Testing an Integrative Framework.
Abstract
This study meta-analytically examined extensive literature associated with work commitment. The primary purposes were to (a) cumulate correlations among dimensions of work commitment to see which were intercorrelated and (b) determine impact of work commitment dimensions and subdimensions on specific outcome variables (job satisfaction, job performance, turnover intentions, and turnover). Results were cumulated across 997 articles. The positive manifold of correlations suggests the presence of a common psychological construct underlying different commitment forms, with the exception of calculative, continuance, and union commitment. Most of the 94 meta-analyzed correlations were small, suggesting that concept redundancy is not a major concern. Meta-analyses of the correlations of 24 commitment constructs with 4 outcome variables suggest that different commitment forms have similar patterns of correlations with outcome variables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.171 · Cited by 6,449
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements
Rousseau, D. (1995) · doi:10.4135/9781452231594 · Cited by 3,453
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
Employee reactions to job characteristics.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031152 · Cited by 2,442
Measurement of job and work involvement
Kanungo, R. N. (1982) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.341 · Cited by 1,718
THEORY TESTING: COMBINING PSYCHOMETRIC META‐ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING
VISWESVARAN, C., & ONES, D. S. (1995) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x · Cited by 926
Self-citationWhat do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology.
Schmidt, F. L. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.10.1173 · Cited by 564
Cited by
The Meaning of Employee Engagement
Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x · Cited by 3,203
Chang, C.-H., Rosen, C. C., & Levy, P. E. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.43670894 · Cited by 616
Commitment before and after: An evaluation and reconceptualization of organizational commitment
Cohen, A. (2007) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.05.001 · Cited by 573
Giving Commitment: Employee Support Programs and The Prosocial Sensemaking Process
Grant, A. M., Dutton, J. E., & Rosso, B. D. (2008) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2008.34789652 · Cited by 555
Employee commitment and well-being: A critical review, theoretical framework and research agenda
Meyer, J. P., & Maltin, E. R. (2010) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.007 · Cited by 537
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper-Hakim, A., & Viswesvaran, C.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-259
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W1975348820
- Cited by
- 881
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 38.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Construct of Work Commitment: Testing an Integrative Framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.241
- The paper
- Cooper-Hakim, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). The Construct of Work Commitment: Testing an Integrative Framework. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
