The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”
Abstract
A theoretical framework is outlined in which the key construct is the need for (nonspecific) cognitive closure. The need for closure is a desire for definite knowledge on some issue. It represents a dimension of stable individual differences as well as a situationally evocable state. The need for closure has widely ramifying consequences for social-cognitive phenomena at the intrapersonal, interpersonal, and group levels of analysis. Those consequences derive from 2 general tendencies, those of urgency and performance. The urgency tendency represents an individual's inclination to attain closure as soon as possible, and the permanence tendency represents an individual's inclination to maintain it for as long as possible. Empirical evidence for present theory attests to diverse need for closure effects on fundamental social psychological phenomena, including impression formation, stereotyping, attribution, persuasion, group decision making, and language use in intergroup contexts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the default mindset of most adults is a relatively inactive state where the past unduly influences the present (e.g., Hart et al., 2009; Kruglanski & Webster, 1996).”
From Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health (2010) · cites this paper as Kruglanski & Webster, 1996
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · Cited by 26,772
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud
Freud, S. (1953) · Cited by 17,730
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Miller, K. A. J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1988) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2070638 · Cited by 15,406
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Sorge, A. M., & Hofstede, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393017 · Cited by 15,195
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,001
Merely Folklore? The Role of a Growth Mindset in the Taking and Timing of Entrepreneurial Actions
Li, H., Ozdemir, S. Z., & Heslin, P. A. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/10422587221128270 · Cited by 25
“…characteristics (e.g., gender and minority status) or personality (e.g., high risk-aversion (Fairlie & Holleran, 2012) or need for closure (Kruglanski & Webster, 2018)) increase the challenges of their entrepreneurial journey, are embarking on the potentially more complex and challenging…”
BackgroundFear, Fanaticism, and Fragile Identities
Tietjen, R. R. (2023) · The Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10892-023-09418-9 · Cited by 22
“By contrast, people who are primarily aversive to uncertainty itself—they want to be certain—are primarily concerned with resolving uncertainty quickly and/ or permanently—even at the expense of truth and knowledge gain (Kruglanski 2004; Kruglanski and Webster 1996).”
BackgroundWhen need for closure leads to positive attitudes towards a negatively stereotyped outgroup
Kossowska, M., Dragon, P., & Bukowski, M. (2014) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9414-5 · Cited by 22
“…the NFC fosters a desire for firm knowledge, and that such knowledge is grounded in the shared reality of one’s group, NFC also fosters a greater affinity for one’s ingroup than for outgroups (e.g., Golec and Federico 2004; Kruglanski et al. 2002; Kruglanski and Webster 1996; Shah et al. 1998).”
The Motivational Dynamics of Retrieval-Induced Forgetting
Pica, G., Pierro, A., Bélanger, J. J., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167213499237 · Cited by 22
“We assumed that the NfCC (Kruglanski, 2004; Kruglanski, Pierro, Mannetti, & De Grada, 2006; Kruglanski & Webster, 1996) represents such a motivation.”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe appraisal basis of anger occurrence and intensity revisited
Mechelen, I. V., & Hennes, K. (2009) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930902958297 · Cited by 22
“A similar prediction was made regarding people scoring higher on lack of openness/need for closure, as such people are supposed to rely more on available information by which they may tend to overlook information on absent appraisals (see, eg, Kruglanski & Webster, 1996 ).”
MethodRai, R., & Prakash, A. (2016) · Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.rpto.2016.02.001 · Cited by 36
“High epistemic individuals are open to new ideas, show tolerance to ambiguity, and consider multiple approaches to solve problems (Kruglanski & Webster, 1996).”
BackgroundCole, K. (2016) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2016.1198708 · Cited by 22
What We Mean When We Say “Conspiracy Theory”
Walker, J. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0003 · Cited by 23
Roets, A., & Hiel, A. V. (2011) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395773 · Cited by 22
“…terms of affect as information, the hedonistic principle, and uncertainty reduction. the relationship between cognitive Ability and motivation (Path 5) Some scholars have suggested that cognitive ability and motivation may have a causal relationship (e.g., Hess, 2001; Kruglanski & Webster, 1996).”
BackgroundInfluentialPerceiving Racism in Ambiguous Situations: Who Relies on Easy-to-Use Information?
Corning, A. F., & Bucchianeri, M. M. (2010) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224540903365398 · Cited by 22
“The need for closure refers to the tendency of some people more than others to jump to conclusions quickly and stick tightly to them—they are said to “seize and freeze” upon a conclusion or answer, any answer, to avoid ambiguity ( Kruglanski & Webster, 1996 , p.”
Background3 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning
Bartels, B. L. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0003 · Cited by 22
Resistance of Personal Risk Perceptions to Debiasing Interventions
Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. P. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.019 · Cited by 24
The maintenance of entitativity: a subjective group dynamics approach
Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., de Moura, G. R., Hutchinson, P., & Bown, N. J. (2004) · Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) · Cited by 22
Medical decision making among cancer patients.
Petersen, S., Heesacker, M., & Marsh, R. D. (2001) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0167.48.2.239 · Cited by 22
Kim, T., Usman, U., Garvey, A. M., & Duhachek, A. (2025) · Consumer Psychology Review · doi:10.1002/arcp.70008 · Cited by 33
Yurt, E., & Kuşci, İ. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08800-0 · Cited by 32
“Whereas cognitive miserliness encompasses a broader tendency to rely on heuristics and avoid cognitive effort across all domains, epistemic laziness specifically targets the reluctance to engage in knowledge-building and critical evaluation processes (Kruglanski & Webster, 1996; Stanovich, 2009 ).”
Xu, X., Plaks, J. E., & Peterson, J. B. (2016) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12248 · Cited by 24
“Thus, although Orderliness is related to Need for Closure (or more specifically, its Order subscale), these data indicate that Orderliness offers additional predictive power beyond Need for Closure alone.”
BackgroundInfluentialConspiracy Theories and Religion
Robertson, D. G. C., & Dyrendal, A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0028 · Cited by 21
Interdisciplinary History of Intercultural Communication Studies
Kulich, S. J., Weng, L., Tong, R., & DuBois, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108854184.006 · Cited by 25
Intellectual humility: an old problem in a new psychological perspective
Bąk, W., Wójtowicz, B., & Kutnik, J. (2021) · Current Issues in Personality Psychology · doi:10.5114/cipp.2021.106999 · Cited by 26
“…as wisdom (Grossmann, 2017), dogmatism (Altemeyer, 1996; Duckitt, 2009), need for cognition (Cacioppo & Petty, 1982; Petty et al., 2009), need for closure (Kruglanski & Webster, 1996), openness to experience (McCrae & Sutin, 2009) or the HEXACO honesty-humility dimension (Lee & Ashton, 2004).”
BackgroundMattarelli, E., Bertolotti, F., Prencipe, A., & Gupta, A. D. (2021) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1487 · Cited by 21
Johnson, J. S. (2023) · Global Society · doi:10.1080/13600826.2023.2205444 · Cited by 26
“Second, when individuals are motivated to explain or understand an agent ’ s behaviour – to reduce uncertainty and ambiguity and control one ’ s environment and the need for cognitive closure – the tendency to anthropomorphise generally increases (Kruglanski and Webster 1996).”
BackgroundThe Psychological and Social Foundations of Ideological Belief Systems
Federico, C. M., & Malka, A. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197541296.013.16 · Cited by 36
Alison, L. J., Kebbell, M. R., & Leung, J. (2007) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1408 · Cited by 24
Roets, A., Hiel, A. V., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2012) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9299-0 · Cited by 21
Self-citationModelling and attitudes towards the future
Boschetti, F., Walker, I. A., & Price, J. (2016) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.11.009 · Cited by 21
“When one such structure is at hand, people may adopt it more or less critically (Kruglanski et al., 1991; Kruglanski and Webster, 1996; Kruglanski et al., 1993; Kunda, 1990).”
BackgroundNeed for closure and multitasking performance: The role of shifting ability
Szumowska, E., & Kossowska, M. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.055 · Cited by 21
Fu, J. H., Zhang, Z.-X., Li, F., & Leung, Y. K. (2016) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022116652729 · Cited by 21
“NFC is referred to as the need for a firm answer in a psychologically ambiguous situation (Kruglanski & Webster, 1996).”
Reviews, expectations, and the experience of stories
Tiede, K. E., & Appel, M. (2020) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2019.1602055 · Cited by 22
The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Training
Landis, D., & Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108854184 · Cited by 25
Bélanger, J. J., Pierro, A., Barbieri, B., Carlo, N. A. D., Falco, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2015) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2015.1061999 · Cited by 27
“In what follows, we first briefly review the social power theory (Raven, Schwarzwald, & Koslowsky, 1998) and then carry out a similar review for NFCC (Kruglanski & Webster, 1996).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationDispositional Need for Cognitive Closure and Self-Enhancing Beliefs
Taris, T. W. (2000) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224540009600444 · Cited by 21
“According to Kruglanski and Webster (1996). need for closure may lead to a tendency toward urgency (i.”
BackgroundOmelicheva, M. Y. (2005) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512160590961784 · Cited by 21
Social influence and persuasion: Recent theoretical developments and integrative attempts
Erb, H., & Bohner, G. (2007) · PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) · Cited by 21
Perceived Control as a Moderator of the Prototype Effect in the Perception of Discrimination
Krumm, A. J., & Corning, A. F. (2008) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00341.x · Cited by 21
Professional Skepticism and Auditor Cognitive Performance in a Hypothesis Testing TaskPreprint
Peytcheva, M. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2288039 · Cited by 21
NEED FOR CLOSURE, GENDER AND SOCIAL SELF-ESTEEM OF YOUNGSTERSPreprint
Vermeir, I., & Geuens, M. (2005) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 21
Empirical development of a scale of patience
Dudley, K. C. (2003) · doi:10.33915/etd.1920 · Cited by 21
“Under situations of time urgency individuals make attributional decisions quicker and hold to these attributions more fervently than those not under time urgency (Kruglanski & Webster, 1996).”
BackgroundNeed for Cognitive Closure and Political Ideology
Panno, A., Carrus, G., Brizi, A., Maricchiolo, F., Giacomantonio, M., & Mannetti, L. (2018) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000333 · Cited by 20
“…motives drive people’s worldviews, including epistemic motives to manage complexity, reduce uncertainty, and address ambiguity, which are captured, in large part, by cognitive style such as the NCC (e.g., Jost et al., 2003; Kruglanski & Webster, 1996; Ksiazkiewicz et al., 2016; Roets et al., 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialMotivated Social Cognition and Authoritarianism
Berggren, M., Akrami, N., Bergh, R., & Ekehammar, B. (2019) · Journal of Individual Differences · doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000293 · Cited by 20
Buijsrogge, A., Duyck, W., & Derous, E. (2020) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2020.1833980 · Cited by 25
“Conversely, individuals with low levels of NFCC are motivated to continue gathering information and delay their judgements (Kruglanski & Webster, 1996).”
BackgroundKnoche, H. “. (2022) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100643 · Cited by 25
Broek, T. A. V. D., Langley, D., Ehrenhard, M., & Groen, A. J. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1604 · Cited by 22
“Was It Me or Was It Gender Discrimination?” How Women Respond to Ambiguous Incidents at Work
Doering, L. B., Doering, J., & Tilcsik, A. (2023) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v10.a18 · Cited by 21
Nurek, M., Kostopoulou, O., & Hagmayer, Y. (2014) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500006434 · Cited by 20
“…Trost & Newsom, 1995) or the Myers-Briggs dimension of judgment, while Meloy (2000) found distortion to be unrelated to the Need to Evaluate (Jarvis & Petty, 1996), the Need for Cognitive Closure (Kruglanski, Webster & Klem, 1993; Webster & Kruglanski, 1994; Kruglanski & Webster, 1996) and the PNS.”
BackgroundRosa, M., & Waldzus, S. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.004 · Cited by 20
Group Reaction to Defection: The Impact of Shared Reality
Mannetti, L., Levine, J. M., Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2010) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.3.447 · Cited by 20
Self-citationOstrofsky, J., & Shobe, E. R. (2015) · Empirical Studies of the Arts · doi:10.1177/0276237415570016 · Cited by 20
Stickney, L. T., & Geddes, D. (2016) · Negotiation and Conflict Management Research · doi:10.1111/ncmr.12071 · Cited by 20
“This “epistemic motivation” (Kruglanski & Webster, 1996) is seen to vary with situation, increasing when individuals feel more personally impacted or involved.”
BackgroundHistorical context of behavioral economics
Rehman, T. U. (2016) · Intellectual Economics · doi:10.1016/j.intele.2017.03.006 · Cited by 21
“Cacioppo et al. (1996), Kruglanski and Webster (1996), Stanovich and West (2000), Auctores Publishing – Volume 6(1)-110 www.auctoresonline.org ISSN: 2637-8892 Page 2 of 3 Strathman, Gleicher, Boninger, and Scott Edwards (1994), and Sternberg (2003) have investigated some of the various examples of…”
BackgroundAssessment and Locomotion Conjunction: How Looking Complements Leaping … But Not Always
Pierro, A., Chernikova, M., Destro, C. L., Higgins, E. T., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2018) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2018.02.001 · Cited by 20
Self-citationWood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0016 · Cited by 22
Lindgren, S. A. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111184 · Cited by 20
Hart, W., Adams, J. M., Burton, K. A., Shreves, W. B., & Hamilton, J. C. (2012) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.05.004 · Cited by 20
Need for Closure, the Big Five, and Public Self-Consciousness
Stalder, D. R. (2007) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.3200/socp.147.1.91-94 · Cited by 20
The Influence of Ease of Retrieval on Judgment as a Function of Attention to Subjective Experience
Danziger, S., Moran, S., & Rafaely, V. (2006) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1602_9 · Cited by 20
The Weighing of Evidence and the Determinants of Confidence
Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.015 · Cited by 20
TIME PRESSURE AND TEAM PERFORMANCE: AN ATTENTIONAL FOCUS INTEGRATION
Karau, S. J., & Kelly, J. R. (2004) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1016/s1534-0856(03)06009-2 · Cited by 20
Womick, J., & King, L. A. (2021) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.7771 · Cited by 18
“Consistent with past research (e.g., Altemeyer, 1998; Carney, Jost, Gosling, & Potter, 2008; Choma et al., 2012; Kruglanski & Webster, 1996; Van Hiel, Onraet, & De Pauw, 2010; Yilmaz & Saribay, 2017), openness to experience, active open-minded thinking, (low) dogmatism, (low) preference for one…”
BackgroundComparing effects of two collaboration scripts on learning activities for wiki-based environments
Heimbuch, S., Ollesch, L., & Bodemer, D. (2018) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-018-9283-0 · Cited by 19
How need for closure and deal proneness shape consumers’ freemium versus premium price choices
Biraglia, A., Bowen, K. T., Gerrath, M. H. E. E., & Musarra, G. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.064 · Cited by 19
Unsticking the rationality stalemate: Motivated reasoning, reality, and irrationality
Kurdoglu, R. S., Lerner, D., & Ateş, N. Y. (2022) · Journal of Business Venturing Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00336 · Cited by 20
Albarello, F., Mula, S., Contu, F., Baldner, C., Kruglanski, A. W., & Pierro, A. (2023) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101755 · Cited by 19
Self-citationBennett, K. M., Panzeri, A., Derrer‐Merk, E., Butter, S., Hartman, T. K., Mason, L., McBride, O., Murphy, J., Shevlin, M. E., Miller, J. G., et al. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283254 · Cited by 22
Opposing effects of sociodemographic variables on price knowledge
Gaston‐Breton, C., & Raghubir, P. (2012) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-012-9201-6 · Cited by 19
Am I My Genes? Perceived Genetic Etiology, Intrapersonal Processes, and Health
Cheung, B. Y., Dar‐Nimrod, I., & Gonsalkorale, K. (2014) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12138 · Cited by 22
“When NfCC is high, people tend to show a preference for information that can be processed quickly and easily (Kruglanski & Webster, 1996).”
BackgroundComplicating decisions: The work ethic heuristic and the construction of effortful decisions.
Schrift, R. Y., Kivetz, R., & Netzer, O. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000171 · Cited by 19
Uncertainty and prejudice: The role of religiosity in shaping group attitudes
Sekerdej, M., Kossowska, M., & Czernatowicz‐Kukuczka, A. (2017) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2298 · Cited by 19
Prati, F., Moscatelli, S., Felicia Pratto, B., & Rubini, M. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12445 · Cited by 19
Toh, C. A., & Miller, S. R. (2018) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4042154 · Cited by 20
An Information-Theoretic Approach to Personalized Explainable Machine Learning
Jung, A., & Nardelli, P. H. J. (2020) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2020.2993176 · Cited by 19
Benatov, J., Berger, R., & Tadmor, C. T. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104065 · Cited by 24
Needs and incentives as sources of goals.
Gollwitzer, P. M., Kappes, H. B., & Oettingen, G. (2012) · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · Cited by 17
Elasticity in evaluations of criminal evidence: Exploring the role of cognitive dissonance
Ask, K., Reinhard, M., Marksteiner, T., & Granhag, P. A. (2011) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1348/135532510x510153 · Cited by 19
The Search for Complex Problem-Solving Strategies in the Presence of Stressors
Hiel, A. V., & Mervielde, I. (2007) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872007x249938 · Cited by 21
“Indeed, according to this theory (Kruglanski & Webster, 1996), stressors such as time pressure and noise produce a tendency to store the acquired knowledge and to safeguard the knowledge system against new, contradictory information.”
BackgroundPictorial and mental arid landscape images reduce the motivation to change negative habits
Shalev, I. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.005 · Cited by 19
Categorizing the Social World: Affect, Motivation, and Self‐Regulation
Bodenhausen, G. V., Todd, A. R., & Becker, A. P. (2006) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(06)47004-3 · Cited by 19
Cognitive Skills as Predictor of Attitudes Toward Political Conflict: A Study of Polish Politicians
de Zavala, A. G. (2002) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/0162-895x.00305 · Cited by 19
“In this regard, research suggests that being held accountable for the quality of one’s cognitive performances and the final outcomes they lead to may enhance the likelihood of complex thinking (Tetlock, 1992; see also Kruglanski & Webster, 1996).”
BackgroundStandards, Expectancies, and Social Comparison
Biernat, M., & Billings, L. S. (2001) · doi:10.1002/9780470998519.ch12 · Cited by 19
Assessing the Development of Cross-Cultural Competence in Soldiers
McCloskey, M. J., Grandjean, A., Behymer, K. J., & Ross, K. G. (2010) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · doi:10.21236/ada533959 · Cited by 19
Fear of Crime and the Psychology of Risk
Jackson, J., & Gouseti, I. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_660 · Cited by 19
Chen, Y.-H. (2025) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-025-01205-7 · Cited by 18
“This concept of NFCC describes the desire of individuals to have a comprehensible and explanatory answer to external information and stimuli, thus avoiding a state of vagueness and confusion [69 ].”
Anier, N., Roebroeck, É., Kleinlogel, E. P., Badea, C., Nugier, A., Berthon, M., & Guimond, S. (2019) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.07.006 · Cited by 18
Solak, Ç., Peker-Dural, H., Karlıdağ, S., & Peker, M. (2021) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111245 · Cited by 18
“NCC refers to “the desire for a firm answer to a question and an aversion towards ambiguity” (Kruglanski & Webster, 1996, p. 264).”
The psychology of getting busy: Multitasking as a consequence of goal activation.
Szumowska, E., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001077 · Cited by 20
Self-citationJohnson, M. W., Gheihman, G., Thomas, H. R., Schiff, G. D., Olson, A. P. J., & Begin, A. S. (2022) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2022.2058383 · Cited by 20
Jones, C., Galbraith, N., Boyda, D., Martin, D., & Jackson, K. (2023) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2023.112155 · Cited by 17
Value frames in discourse supporting transgender athlete bans
Martin, K., & Rahilly, E. P. (2023) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/09579265231187058 · Cited by 18
“Social psychologists have long noted the human need for cognitive closure which demands a firm answer to a question, an aversion toward ambiguity and a desire for certainty (Kruglanski and Webster, 1996).”
BackgroundTarget hierarchy-guided knowledge tracing : Fine-grained knowledge state modeling
Sun, X., Zhang, K., Shen, S., Wang, F., Guo, Y., & Liu, Q. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123898 · Cited by 20
Architectural styles of curiosity in global Wikipedia mobile app readership
Zhou, D., Patankar, S. P., Lydon‐Staley, D. M., Zurn, P., Gerlach, M., & Bassett, D. S. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adn3268 · Cited by 19
Bouizegarene, N., & Philippe, F. L. (2016) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2015.1034138 · Cited by 16
Sparkman, D. J., & Blanchar, J. C. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.049 · Cited by 18
“Generally thought of as broader than the need for cognitive closure construct (e.g., Kruglanski & Webster, 1996), Openness to Experience is a Big-Five personality dimension that drives social experience, interpersonal interactions, values, and attitudes (McCrae, 1996).”
BackgroundInfluentialWright, S. A., Clarkson, J. J., & Kardes, F. R. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.12.010 · Cited by 18
“Lastly, though revealing novel information stimulates curiosity (see Experiment 2), some individuals may view novel information as inherently threatening to their existing attitudes (Kruglanski & Webster, 1996) and thus maintain resistance despite the heightened awareness of a knowledge gap.”
BackgroundTechniques of Social Influence
Doliński, D. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315746876 · Cited by 37
Conflicts of Interest in Public Policy Research
MacCoun, R. J. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610332.018 · Cited by 18
“Because of such problems, Thibaut and Walker (1978) argued that the inquisitorial method is to be preferred for “truth conflicts,” purely cognitive disagreements in which the parties are disinterested (or have shared interests) and simply want to discover the correct answer.”
BackgroundMinimal and maximal goal orientation and reactions to norm violations
Fritsche, I., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., & Neumann, J. (2008) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.481 · Cited by 18
Alcohol's effect on aggression identification: A two-channel theory.
Lange, J. E. (2002) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037//0893-164x.16.1.47 · Cited by 18
Bailey, C. D., Daily, C. M., & Phillips, T. J. (2011) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria-50021 · Cited by 18
Tolerance For Ambiguity: An Investigation On Its Effect On Student Design Performance
Mohammed, S., Okudan, G., & Ogot, M. (2020) · 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings · doi:10.18260/1-2--909 · Cited by 9
Zhang, R., Schimel, J., & Faucher, E. H. (2014) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2014.932835 · Cited by 7
“One line of work based on lay epistemology theory (Kruglanski, 1989; Kruglanski & Webster, 1996) suggests that differing needs for cognitive closure or structure determine two broad terror management strategies.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- ORCID
- Kruglanski, Arie W.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 263-283
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W1994106556
- Cited by
- 2,379
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 105 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 150 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 135 · 2017: 107 · 2016: 98 · 2015: 92 · 2014: 107 · 2013: 88 · 2012: 108
- FWCI
- 80.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01mh052578-05, 5k05mh001213-03)
- National Institute of Mental Health (1R01 MH 52578, KO5/MH01213)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- need for closure, cognitive closure, impression formation, stereotyping, attribution, persuasion, group decision making, individual differences, social cognition
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Decision Making, Humans, Intelligence, Language, Personality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review