Cited by 265Reading and Literacy DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyLanguage Development and Disorders

The development of reading impairment: A cognitive neuroscience model

Open access
McCandliss, Bruce D., Noble, Kimberly G.·2003·Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews

Abstract

This review discusses recent cognitive neuroscience investigations into the biological bases of developmental dyslexia, a common disorder impacting approximately 5 to 17 percent of the population [Stanovich, 1986, Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly 21: 360–407]. Our aim is to summarize central findings from several lines of evidence that converge on pivotal aspects of the brain bases of developmental dyslexia. We highlight ways in which the approaches and methodologies of developmental cognitive neuroscience that are addressed in this special issue—including neuroimaging, human genetics, refinement of cognitive and biological phenotypes, neural plasticity and computational models—can be employed in uncovering the biological bases of this disorder. Taking a developmental perspective on the biological bases of dyslexia, we propose a simple cascading model for the developmental progression of this disorder, in which individual differences in brain areas associated with phonological processing influence the specialization of visual areas involved in the rapid processing of written words. We also discuss recent efforts to understand the impact of successful reading interventions in terms of changes within cortical circuits associated with reading ability. MRDD Research Reviews 2003;9:196–205. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrdd.10080

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 89 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    A wide number of neuroimaging studies converge on reduced recruitment of left perisylvian regions by dyslexic individuals during phonologically challenging tasks.

    “This line of reasoning has resulted in a wide number of studies converging on the same conclusion: there is a reduced tendency of dyslexic individuals to recruit left perisylvian regions when faced with a phonologically challenging task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shaywitz et al., 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    Recent studies provide strongly converging data that perception of visual word forms reliably activates the left fusiform gyrus more than control visual stimuli.

    “Recent studies have produced strongly converging data supporting the claim that the perception of visual word forms reliably activates the left fusiform gyrus in a way that other stimuli that control for visual stimulation do not”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Price et al., 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Puce et al., 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Brunswick et al., 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    Neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that dyslexic adults typically under-activate the Visual Word Form Area during word reading tasks.

    “A number of neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that, in contrast to nonimpaired readers, dyslexic adults typically under-activate this region during word reading tasks (See Table 1, items marked FG).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Table 1

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    A specific pattern of linguistic deficits related to phonological processing significantly predicts the emergence of reading difficulties.

    “A very specific pattern of linguistic deficits associated with phonological processing has been found to significantly predict the emergence of reading difficulties [Bradley and Bryant, 1983;Bishop and Adams, 1990;Gathercole and Baddeley, 1987].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bradley and Bryant, 1983

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bishop and Adams, 1990

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gathercole and Baddeley, 1987

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Developmental dyslexia is linked to a core cognitive deficit in phonological awareness tasks that require analyzing and synthesizing sounds within syllables.

    “This research suggests that developmental dyslexia is linked to a core cognitive deficit in phonological awareness tasks that require analysis and synthesis of the sounds within syllables [Wagner et al., 1997].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wagner et al., 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 12
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 5
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In PET studies, a reading pronunciation task increased left STG activity in nonimpaired subjects but not in dyslexic subjects.

    “Rumsey and colleagues demonstrated that a reading pronunciation task led to increased activity in left STG in nonimpaired subjects [Rumsey et al., 1997a], but that dyslexic subjects showed no such increase [Rumsey et al., 1997b].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rumsey et al., 1997a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rumsey et al., 1997b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Responsiveness of the left fusiform region reflects perceptual expertise that normally develops over learning to read but develops differently in dyslexic individuals.

    “Responsiveness of this region reflects a form of perceptual expertise which normally develops over the course of learning to read, but which has also been shown to develop differently in dyslexic individuals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A recent review of over 20 investigations argued that the finding of lack of normal planum temporale asymmetry in dyslexia has not been consistently replicated and is complicated by measurement, classification, and confounds.

    “a recent review [Eckert and Leonard, 2000] of over 20 such investigations argued that this general finding has not been consistently replicated, and that this literature is complicated by differences in measurement techniques, classification criteria, and potential confounds such as IQ and handedness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eckert and Leonard, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pure alexia preserves some ability to spell, write, and recognize letters but drastically impairs integrated perception of letters in a word, causing laborious reading with reaction time proportional to word length.

    “This syndrome preserves some ability to spell, write, and recognize letters, but drastically impairs the ability to perceive the letters of a word in an integrated fashion, resulting in laborious attempts at reading, with reaction time proportional to the number of letters in the word.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Warrington and Shallice, 1980

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    That brain-behavior relationship held across the full score range in both dyslexic and nonimpaired children and remained significant after controlling for age.

    “This brain-behavior relationship was present across the full range of scores including both dyslexic and nonimpaired children, and remained signifi-cant even when the effects of age were controlled.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shaywitz et al., 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Converting letters to sounds lets a child produce plausible pronunciations for unfamiliar printed words and create error signals so that successive decoding attempts are stored as phonological patterns linked to known words.

    “Decoding letters into sounds provides a child with a means to both generate plausible pronunciations for unfamiliar visual words, and to generate error-signals that allow successive approximations from decoding attempts to be stored as phonological patterns associated with known words.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Share and Stanovich, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Effortful decoding allows automatic word reading to be strengthened gradually via self-teaching.

    “Share and Stanovich argue that effortful decoding processes provide a way for automatic word reading skills to be progressively strengthened through a form of self-teaching.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Share and Stanovich, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Decoding skill is central to the development of rapid word recognition.

    “One possibility, suggested by cognitive research on reading development, is that a child's decoding skill-which involves simultaneously attending to both letters and the sounds those letters make within a word-plays a fundamental role in establishing rapid word recognition ability [Perfetti, 1985;Share and Stanovich, 1995].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Perfetti, 1985

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Share and Stanovich, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The development of perceptual expertise associated with the VWFA progresses gradually over several years of reading experience and is still not at adult levels even after five years.

    “The development of perceptual expertise associated with the VWFA appears to progress quite gradually over several years of reading experience, and is still not at adult levels even after five years of reading experience [Gibson and Levin, 1975;Aghabanian and Nazir, 2000].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gibson and Levin, 1975

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Aghabanian and Nazir, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both dyslexic and nonimpaired subjects show later left superior temporal sources peaking around 300 ms, but these signals show functional disruption in dyslexics.

    “Although both dyslexic and nonimpaired subjects demonstrated later sources associated with left superior temporal activity that peaked around 300 msec, these signals showed functional disruption in dyslexics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Helenius et al., 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Groups with different surface symptoms across writing systems may share one underlying biologically-defined core deficit that can be studied similarly across cultures.

    “it is possible that groups of different symptoms share one underlying biologically-defined core deficit that can be studied in a similar way across cultures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Paulesu et al., 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This result is consistent with the majority of cases of word form dyslexia in which damage is reported to this region or to fibers providing input to it, although additional regions have been described.

    “This result is consistent with the majority of cases of this syndrome in which damage is reported either to this region or to fibers that provide input to this region [Beversdorf et al., 1997], although additional regions associated with this disorder have also been described [Dejerine, 1892].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Beversdorf et al., 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dejerine, 1892

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In nonimpaired subjects, left angular gyrus activity during reading is strongly correlated with activity in left posterior STG, left inferior frontal gyrus, and extrastriate visual areas in occipital and temporal cortices of the left hemisphere, and with lingual and fusiform gyri.

    “In nonimpaired subjects, left angular gyrus activity was strongly correlated with activity in the left posterior STG, the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and extrastriate visual areas in the occipital and temporal cortices of the left hemisphere.Angular gyrus activity was also correlated with areas in the lingual and fusiform gyri.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Horwitz et al., 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In MEG studies, both dyslexic and nonimpaired readers show equivalent responses in early visual areas, but only nonimpaired readers show an additional response about 150-200 ms after visual word onset localized to left inferior temporal regions.

    “While both groups demonstrate equivalent responses in early visual areas, only nonimpaired readers demonstrate an additional response approximately 150 -200 msec after the onset of a visual word; this response is localized to left inferior temporal regions [Helenius et al., 1999].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Helenius et al., 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    MEG suggests that during word recognition, the left fusiform region is actively involved in computations concerning the visual word form within the first 150-200 ms, and left superior temporal activity occurs later, perhaps associated with phonological processing.

    “MEG studies thus suggest that during word recognition, the left fusiform region is actively involved in computations concerning the visual word form within the first 150 to 200 msec of processing, and that activity in left superior temporal regions occurs much later, perhaps associated with processing of phonological information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Environmental causes of poor phonological awareness may cascade onto VWFA development in a similar way.

    “However, environmental factors that lead to poor phonological awareness skills might have a similar cascading impact on the development of the VWFA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
16 of 16
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Reading is a cultural invention acquired only after years of extensive teaching and practice.

    “given that reading is a cultural invention that is acquired only after years of extensive teaching and practice”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Understanding the left fusiform region's role in dyslexia requires first understanding its role in typical reading.

    “In this case, however, understanding this region's role in the disorder is first contingent upon our understanding its role in typically developing reading function.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Little is known about the mechanism by which functional properties of perisylvian regions associated with phonology influence the development of visual expertise effects supported by the fusiform gyrus.

    “Little is presently known, however, about the mechanism by which functional properties of the perisylvian regions associated with phonology influence the development of visual expertise effects supported by the fusiform gyrus.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such differences have not yet been associated with neuropathology in this region, but may instead reflect the absence of a specialization that accrues over the course of years of successful reading experience.

    “Such differences have not yet been associated with neuropathology in this region, but mayinstead reflect the absence of a specialization that accrues over the course of years of successful reading experience [55].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Memory task described as both phonological and nonphonological

    Minor

    The discussion says the memory task had nonphonological demands, but Table 1 identifies it as a phonological short-term memory task.

  • Simos intervention study assigned different years

    Minor

    Table 1 labels the study of children whose neural activity changed after a phonologically based intervention as Simos et al. (2001), while the intervention discussion and reference list identify it as Simos et al. (2002).

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Gathercole SE, 1987, The process underlying segmental analysis, European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 462
  2. Habib M, 1996, Parietal lobe morphology predicts phonological skills in developmental dyslexia, Brain and Cognition, 32, 139
  3. McCandliss BD, 2001, A cognitive intervention for reading impaired children produces increased recruitment of left per‐sylvian regions during word reading: an fMRI study, Neuroscience Abstracts, 27, 961
  4. Nagy Z, 2002, Development of temporal white matter structure correlates with reading ability ‐ A DTI study
  5. Perfetti CA, 1985, Reading Ability
  6. Rayner K, 1995, The Psychology of Reading
  7. Reason R, 2001, Educational practice and dyslexia, The Psychologist, 4, 298
  8. Share DL, 1995, Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition, Issues in Education, 1, 1
  9. Smith J, 1997, Consequences of living in poverty for young children's cognitive and verbal ability and early school achievement. Consequences of Growing Up Poor
  10. Whitehurst GJ, 1997, Language processes in context: Language learning in children reared in poverty. Research on communication and language disorders: Contribution to theories of language development, 233

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCandliss, B. D., & Noble, K. G.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
McCandliss, Bruce D.
Venue
Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
196-205
ISSN
  • 1080-4013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2779
OpenAlex
W2120552250
Cited by
265
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 23
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50HD025802, HD25802-13)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
developmental dyslexia, reading disorders, phonological processing, cascade model, neuroplasticity, reading intervention, cortical circuits, visual word processing, individual differences, neuroimaging, human genetics, computational model
MeSH terms
Brain, Child, Cognition Disorders, Dyslexia, Humans, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neurosciences, Phonetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review