The DOI matches its Crossref record; 186 of the 195 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision rules and emergent social norms.
Open accessAbstract
A new theory integrating evolutionary and dynamical approaches is proposed. Following evolutionary models, psychological mechanisms are conceived as conditional decision rules designed to address fundamental problems confronted by human ancestors, with qualitatively different decision rules serving different problem domains and individual differences in decision rules as a function of adaptive and random variation. Following dynamical models, decision mechanisms within individuals are assumed to unfold in dynamic interplay with decision mechanisms of others in social networks. Decision mechanisms in different domains have different dynamic outcomes and lead to different sociospatial geometries. Three series of simulations examining trade-offs in cooperation and mating decisions illustratehow individual decision mechanisms and group dynamics mutually constrain one another, and offer insights about gene-culture interactions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More generally, their work suggests that modal group behavior is very sensitive to individual differences among group members (and, hence, small changes in group makeup: Kenrick et al., 2003).”
From Implications of an Emerging Integration of Universal and Culturally Specific Psychologies (2006) · cites this paper as Kenrick et al., 2003
In the citing paper
“In related work, the game models of Kenrick et al. (2003) describe how small changes in the makeup of a group can, under the right conditions, produce dramatic changes in group norms.”
From Implications of an Emerging Integration of Universal and Culturally Specific Psychologies (2006) · cites this paper as Kenrick et al., 2003
Citations
Cites
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
Parental Investment and Sexual Selection
Trivers, R. L. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315129266-7 · Cited by 10,902
(1976) · Cited by 10,423
Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315129266 · Cited by 7,287
Sociobiology: The New Synthesis.
Lenski, G. E., & Wilson, E. O. (1976) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2576242 · Cited by 6,271
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
- Bell, 1978, Homosexualities: A study of diversity in men and women.
- 10.1037/0003-066X.53.5.533 · DOI
- Crook, 1988, Tibetan polyandry: Problems of adaptation and fitness., 97
- Daly, 1989, Parent-offspring conflict and violence in evolutionary perspective., 25
- Daly, 1988, Homicide.
- Essock-Vitale, 1989, Social and reproductive histories of depressed and anxious women., 105
- Glass, 1986, Cognition
- Graziano, 1997, Interpersonal attraction from an evolutionary perspective: Women's reactions to dominant and prosocial men., 141
- Hettema, 1992, Models of person-situation interactions., 393
- Hill, 1996, Ache life history.
- Janicki, 1998, Evolutionary approaches to culture., 163
- Kenrick, 1987, Gender, genes, and the social environment: A biosocial interactionist perspective., Vol. 7, 14
- 10.1037/0003-066X.43.1.23 · DOI
- Kenrick, 1987, A biosocial model of relationship formation., 59
- Kenrick, 1997, The evolutionary psychology of relationships., 151
- Krebs, 1997, Social illusions and self-deception: The evolution of biases in social perception., 21
- Miller, 1997, On the dynamics of human bonding and reproductive success: Seeking windows on the adapted-for human-environmental interface., 197
- Rausch, 1977, Paradox, levels, and junctures in person-environment systems., 287
- 10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.121 · DOI
- Snyder, 1985, Personality and social behavior., Vol. 2, 883
- Tesser, 1994, Aggression, love, conformity, and other social psychological catastrophes., 96
- 2000, Marriage and divorce data.
- Wiggins, 1985, The interpersonal circle: A structural model for the integration of personality research., Vol. 1, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 360
What Modern Sports Competitions Can Tell Us About Human Nature
Furley, P. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618794912 · Cited by 54
Embodiment, evolution, and social cognition: An integrative framework
Kaschak, M. P., & Maner, J. K. (2009) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.664 · Cited by 54
The dynamics of meaningful social interactions and the emergence of collective knowledge
Dankulov, M. M., Melnik, R., & Tadić, B. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep12197 · Cited by 54
If You Want My Advice: Status Motives and Audit Consultations About Accounting Estimates
Knechel, W. R., & Leiby, J. (2016) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12150 · Cited by 49
Lydon, J. E., & Karremans, J. C. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.011 · Cited by 53
Wan, X., Huang, H., Zhang, Y., Peng, Q., Guo, X., Wu, S., Li, Y., Ding, Y., & Chen, C. (2022) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.13081 · Cited by 56
Swami, V., Miller, R., Furnham, A. F., Penke, L., & Tovée, M. J. (2007) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.07.017 · Cited by 49
Evolutionary Social Psychology
Maner, J. K., & Menzel, A. J. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop205023 · Cited by 50
From Evolved Motives to Everyday Mentation: Evolution, Goals, and Cognition
Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., Maner, J. K., & Schaller, M. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511735066.010 · Cited by 47
Self-citationThe Evolved Functions of Procedural Fairness: An Adaptation for Politics
Bøggild, T., & Petersen, M. B. (2015) · Evolutionary psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19671-8_12 · Cited by 45
Distinguishing Intrapsychic From Interpersonal Motives in Psychological Theory and Research
Leary, M. R., Raimi, K. T., Jongman-Sereno, K. P., & Diebels, K. J. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615583132 · Cited by 53
Person Perception, Meet People Perception: Exploring the Social Vision of Groups
Alt, N. P., & Phillips, L. T. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211017858 · Cited by 50
Human Nature, Organizational Politics, and Human Resource Development
Vredenburgh, D. J., & Fossen, R. J. S.-V. (2009) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484309343094 · Cited by 44
Prioritization of Potential Mates’ History of Sexual Fidelity During a Conjoint Ranking Task
Mogilski, J. K., Wade, T. J., & Welling, L. L. M. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214529798 · Cited by 44
Leading the way: Motivating environmental action through perceived marketplace influence
Leary, R. B., Vann, R. J., & Mittelstaedt, J. D. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.028 · Cited by 44
Erez, A., Schilpzand, P., Leavitt, K., Woolum, A. H., & Judge, T. A. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0214 · Cited by 43
Social Categorization and the Perception of Groups and Group Differences
Krueger, J. I., & DiDonato, T. E. (2008) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00083.x · Cited by 43
Renfree, A., & Casado, A. (2018) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01432 · Cited by 44
Becker, D. V., & Neuberg, S. L. (2019) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2019.1614795 · Cited by 46
Cooperative Courtship: Helping Friends Raise and Raze Relationship Barriers
Ackerman, J. M., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209335640 · Cited by 41
Self-citationNonlinear societal change: The perspective of dynamical systems
Nowak, A. K., & Vallacher, R. R. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12271 · Cited by 41
Romantic motives and risk-taking: an evolutionary approach
Greitemeyer, T., Kastenmüller, A., & Fischer, P. A. (2012) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2012.713388 · Cited by 40
Johnson, K. A., White, A. E., Boyd, B. M., & Cohen, A. B. (2011) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022111412528 · Cited by 39
Evolutionary Social Psychology
Kenrick, D. T., Ackerman, J., & Ledlow, S. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-36921-x_5 · Cited by 39
Self-citationEvolutionary Psychology and Developmental Dynamics: Comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003).
Buss, D. M., & Reeve, H. K. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.848 · Cited by 39
Rethinking Intractable Conflict: The Perspective of Dynamical Systems
Vallacher, R. R., Coleman, P. T., Nowak, A. K., & Bui‐Wrzosinska, L. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9994-8_4 · Cited by 37
Gender differences in cooperation across 20 societies: a meta-analysis
Spadaro, G., Jin, S., & Balliet, D. P. (2022) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0438 · Cited by 40
Rokach, A. (2014) · TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University) · Cited by 37
Implications of an Emerging Integration of Universal and Culturally Specific Psychologies
Smith, G. T., Spillane, N. S., & Annus, A. M. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00013.x · Cited by 35
White, A. E., Kenrick, D. T., Li, Y. J., Mortensen, C. R., Neuberg, S. L., & Cohen, A. B. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029140 · Cited by 35
Self-citationWe Want the Same Thing: Projection in Judgments of Sexual Intent
Lenton, A. P., Bryan, A. D., Hastie, R., & Fischer, O. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167207301019 · Cited by 35
Methods of Evolutionary Sciences
Simpson, J. A., & Campbell, L. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470939376.ch4 · Cited by 36
Delicate Snowflakes and Broken Bonds: A Conceptualization of Consumption-Based Offense
Liu, P. J., Lamberton, C. P., Bettman, J. R., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucy051 · Cited by 34
A comparison of information processing and dynamical systems perspectives on problem solving
Reed, S. K., & Vallacher, R. R. (2019) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2019.1605930 · Cited by 37
Meske, C., Junglas, I. A., & Stieglitz, S. (2019) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-08-2018-0177 · Cited by 34
Two to Tango : Automatic Social Coordination and the Role of Felt Effort
Ackerman, J. M., & Bargh, J. A. (2010) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262013840.003.0015 · Cited by 39
Evolutionary Social Psychology
Kenrick, D. T., Maner, J. K., & Li, N. P. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych239 · Cited by 32
Self-citationZhang, X., Ma, C., Guo, F., & Li, Z. (2021) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12319 · Cited by 32
Jonason, P. K., Wee, S., & Li, N. P. (2014) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/iops.12118 · Cited by 31
Self-citationFace perception loves a challenge: Less information sparks more attraction
Sadr, J., & Krowicki, L. (2019) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2019.01.009 · Cited by 32
Power Dynamics in an Experimental Game
Felicia Pratto, B., Pearson, A. R., Lee, I., & Saguy, T. (2008) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0075-y · Cited by 30
Schaller, M., Faulkner, J., Park, H. J., Neuberg, L. S., & Kenrick, T. D. (2004) · Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1556/jcep.2.2004.3-4.4 · Cited by 29
Giving to whom? Altruism in different types of relationships
DeScioli, P., & Krishna, S. (2012) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2012.10.003 · Cited by 28
Evolution and Consumer Behavior
Griskevicius, V., & Durante, K. M. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107706552.005 · Cited by 28
Couple Simulation: A Novel Approach for Evaluating Models of Human Mate Choice
Conroy‐Beam, D. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868320971258 · Cited by 27
Schmalt, H.-D. (2006) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.008 · Cited by 27
Social institution, cognition, and survival: a cognitive–social simulation
Sun, R., & Naveh, I. (2007) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-007-0027-5 · Cited by 27
Despotism, democracy, and the evolutionary dynamics of leadership and followership.
van Vugt, M. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0014178 · Cited by 27
Self-protection promotes altruism
Chan, E. Y. (2017) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.05.004 · Cited by 26
Evolutionary psychology and consumer behavior: A constructive critique
Cohen, J. B., & Bernard, H. R. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2013.03.006 · Cited by 24
Evolutionary consumer psychology: Ask not what you can do for biology, but…
Kenrick, D. T., Saad, G., & Griskevicius, V. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2013.04.003 · Cited by 26
Self-citationDo Women Always Behave As Corruption Cleaners?
Guerra, A., & Zhuravleva, T. (2020) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-022-00959-5 · Cited by 26
Models of decision-making and the coevolution of social preferences
Henrich, J., Boyd, R. T., Bowles, S., Camerer, C. F., Fehr, E., Gintis, H. M., McElreath, R. L., Alvard, M., Barr, A. M., Ensminger, J., et al. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05460148 · Cited by 26
Integrating motivation into current conceptualizations of personality
Zeigler‐Hill, V., Vrabel, J. K., Sauls, D., & Lehtman, M. J. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.019 · Cited by 27
KAMA: A Temperature-Driven Model of Mate Choice Using Dynamic Partner Representations
French, R. M., & Kus, E. T. (2008) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/1059712307087598 · Cited by 25
Li, N. P., Yong, J. C., Tsai, M., Lai, M. H. C., Lim, A. J. Y., & Ackerman, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12568 · Cited by 24
Self-citationMerely opting out of a public good is moralized: An error management approach to cooperation.
Delton, A. W., Nemirow, J., Robertson, T. E., Cimino, A., & Cosmides, L. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033495 · Cited by 23
Fundamental social motives measured across forty-two cultures in two waves
Pick, C. M., Ko, A. C., Kenrick, D. T., Wiezel, A., Wormley, A. S., Awad, E., Al-Shawaf, L., Barry, O., Bereby‐Meyer, Y., Boonyasiriwat, W., et al. (2022) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01579-w · Cited by 23
Self-citationvan Vugt, M., & Kurzban, R. (2007) · Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) · Cited by 22
Mating strategies in Chinese culture: female risk avoiding vs. male risk taking
Shan, W., Shenghua, J., Davis, H. M., Peng, K., Shao, X., Youyou, W., Liu, S., Lu, J., Yang, J., Zhang, W., et al. (2011) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.09.001 · Cited by 21
The experience and communication of envy among siblings, siblings-in-law, and spouses
Yoshimura, C. G. (2010) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407510382244 · Cited by 21
Measuring Motivation Multidimensionally
Bernard, L. C., Mills, M. E., Swenson, L. C., & Walsh, R. P. (2008) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191107306131 · Cited by 21
Agent‐system co‐development in supply chain research: Propositions and demonstrative findings
Tangpong, C., Hung, K., & Li, J. (2014) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.002 · Cited by 20
Athamneh, L. N., Stein, J. S., & Bickel, W. K. (2019) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000315 · Cited by 19
Richard, B. W., Holton, E. F., & Katsioloudes, V. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.03.002 · Cited by 19
[Complexity and social psychology of organizations].
Pastor, J., & Izquierdo, A. L. G. (2007) · PubMed · Cited by 19
The Tribal Instinct Hypothesis
van Vugt, M., & Park, J. H. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9781444307948.ch1 · Cited by 19
Social media ills and evolutionary mismatches: a conceptual framework
Lim, A. J., & Tan, E. (2024) · Evolutionary Psychological Science · doi:10.1007/s40806-024-00398-z · Cited by 18
“Division of labor, group defenses, and communal parenting—afforded by group living—provided a buffer against external threats (Kenrick et al., 2003).”
Kaur, H., & Verma, H. V. (2022) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-10-2021-0772 · Cited by 22
Neuberg, S. L., Becker, D. V., & Kenrick, D. T. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730018.013.0032 · Cited by 18
Self-citationIntuitive Political Theory: People's Judgments About How Groups Should Decide
DeScioli, P., & Bokemper, S. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12528 · Cited by 21
Human mate choice is a complex system
Smaldino, P. E., & Schank, J. C. (2011) · Complexity · doi:10.1002/cplx.21382 · Cited by 18
Active Inference in Psychology and Psychiatry: Progress to Date?
Badcock, P. B., & Davey, C. G. (2024) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e26100833 · Cited by 23
Burrows, K. (2012) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-012-0031-7 · Cited by 17
Thompson, C. L. (2015) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.22360 · Cited by 16
Digital consumption and socio-normative vulnerability
Kanungo, R. P., Gupta, S., Patel, P., Prikshat, V., & Liu, R. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121808 · Cited by 19
Relationships, Culture, and Social Change
Goodwin, R. B., & Pillay, U. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511606632.038 · Cited by 16
Li, Y., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Ahlström, D. (2010) · Research on emotion in organizations · doi:10.1108/s1746-9791(2010)0000006010 · Cited by 18
Hornsey, M. J., Wellauer, R., McIntyre, J. C., & Barlow, F. K. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215577366 · Cited by 15
Anxiety: Proximate Processes and Ultimate Functions
Maner, J. K. (2009) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00211.x · Cited by 18
Gangestad, S., Haselton, M., & Buss, D. (2006) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1702_3 · Cited by 16
Farley, J. D. (2007) · Studies in Conflict and Terrorism · doi:10.1080/10576100701611304 · Cited by 15
Dijker, A. J. M. (2019) · Health Psychology Open · doi:10.1177/2055102919889883 · Cited by 16
Yong, J. C., & Li, N. P. (2022) · Culture and Evolution · doi:10.1556/2055.2022.00017 · Cited by 17
Self-citationPersistent Inequality: A Neurosociological Perspective
Davis, J. (2012) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4473-8_21 · Cited by 14
THE EFFECT OF IN-GROUP FAVORITISM ON THE COLLECTIVE BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUALS' OPINIONS
Alizadeh, M., Cioffi‐Revilla, C. A., & Crooks, A. T. (2015) · Advances in Complex Systems · doi:10.1142/s0219525915500022 · Cited by 14
Life history, fundamental motives, and sexual competition
Kenrick, D. T., & Griskevicius, V. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.002 · Cited by 14
Self-citationAn Introduction to Cognitive Modeling
Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9_1 · Cited by 13
Why Do Different Individuals Progress Along Different Life Trajectories?
Smith, G. T. (2009) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01148.x · Cited by 14
Why minds create gods: Devotion, deception, death, and arational decision making
Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04470174 · Cited by 13
Evolved Individual Differences in Human Motivation
Bernard, L. C. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0022 · Cited by 14
Whitehead, L. A., Slovic, S., & Nelson, J. E. (2020) · Technology & Innovation · doi:10.21300/21.2.2020.153 · Cited by 13
Framing Posthumous Organ Donation in Terms of Reciprocity: What Are the Emotional Consequences?
Dijker, A. J. M., Nelissen, R. M. A., & Stijnen, M. (2013) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2013.785401 · Cited by 13
Family Matters: Rethinking the Psychology of Human Social MotivationPreprint
Ko, A. C., Pick, C. M., Kwon, J. Y., Barlev, M., Krems, J. A., Varnum, M. E. W., Neel, R., & Kenrick, D. T. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u8h3x · Cited by 13
Self-citationThe Coevolution of Social Networks and Cognitive Dissonance
Whitaker, R. M., Colombo, G. B., Turner, L. D., Dunham, Y. C., Doyle, D., Roy, E. M., & Giammanco, C. A. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2021.3090833 · Cited by 12
Scilligo, P. (2011) · Transactional Analysis Journal · doi:10.1177/036215371104100302 · Cited by 12
Stuck: Choice and Agency in Psychoanalysis
Weisel-Barth, J. (2009) · International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology · doi:10.1080/15551020902995306 · Cited by 12
Overestimation bias in mate competition
Hill, S. E. (2006) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.08.006 · Cited by 12
Status motives and agent-to-agent information sharing
Bol, J. C., & Leiby, J. (2021) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-021-09598-5 · Cited by 20
Reciprocity and Need in Posthumous Organ Donation
Stijnen, M., & Dijker, A. J. M. (2010) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550610393749 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Kenrick, D. T., Li, N. P., & Butner, J.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-28
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2102214098
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 195
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 22.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion)
- Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Keywords
- evolutionary psychology, dynamical systems, decision rules, social norms, emergent norms, individual differences, gene-culture coevolution, cooperation, mating decisions, social networks, group dynamics, adaptive variation
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Culture, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Psychology, Sexual Behavior, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review