Cited by 26Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Self-protection promotes altruism

Chan, Eugene Y.·2017·Evolution and Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.05.004

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, E. Y.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Chan, Eugene Y.
Venue
Evolution and Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
667-673
ISSN
1090-5138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2616663960
Cited by
26
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Evolution and Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
self-protection, altruism, dictator game, anonymity, affiliation, safety in numbers, prosocial behavior, evolutionary psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review