CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 172Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conceptualizing changes in behavior in intervention research: the range of possible changes model

Open access
De Los Reyes, Andres, Kazdin, Alan E.·2006·Psychological Review
DOI 10.1037/0033-295x.113.3.554PMC PMC3020401
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

An international movement has focused on identifying evidence-based interventions that were developed to change psychological constructs and that are supported by controlled studies. However, inconsistent findings within individual intervention studies and among multiple studies raise critical problems in interpreting the evidence, and deciding when and whether an intervention is evidence-based. A theoretical and methodological framework (Range of Possible Changes [RPC] Model) is proposed to guide the study of change in intervention research. The authors recommend that future quantitative reviews of the research literature use the RPC Model to conceptualize, examine, and classify the available evidence for interventions. Future research should adopt the RPC Model to both develop theory-driven hypotheses and conduct examinations of the instances in which interventions may or may not change psychological constructs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.113.3.554

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 143 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Barlow, 2002, Psychosocial treatments for panic disorders, phobias, and generalized anxiety disorder., 301
  2. 10.1037/0021-843X.96.3.179 · DOI
  3. Chambless, 1998, Update on empirically validated therapies, II., The Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3
  4. Di Nardo, 1988, Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule-Revised (ADIS-R).
  5. Hill, 2004, Methodological issues in studying psychotherapy processes and outcomes., 84
  6. 10.1037/0022-006X.63.5.683 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1073/pnas.021529998 · DOI
  8. Kendall, 1988, Normative comparisons in therapy outcome., Behavioral Assessment, 10, 147
  9. Lambert, 2004, The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy., 139
  10. Nunnally, 1994, Psychometric theory
  11. Spielberger, 1973, Manual for State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children.
  12. 10.1037/0003-066X.32.3.187 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 172

Related

Metadata

Authors
De Los Reyes, A., & Kazdin, A. E.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Kazdin, Alan E.
ORCID
Kazdin, Alan E.
Venue
Psychological Review
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2006
Volume
113
Issue
3
Pages
554-583
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
DOI
10.1037/0033-295x.113.3.554
PMC
PMC3020401
OpenAlex
W2160205814
Cited by
172
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • University Libraries (University of Maryland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH67540, MH59029)
  • William T. Grant Foundation (98-1872-98)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
intervention research, evidence-based interventions, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Humans, Relaxation Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review