The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Children and adults as intuitive scientists.
Abstract
The metaphor of children and lay adults as intuitive scientists has gained wide acceptance. Although useful in one sense, pertaining to scientific understanding, in another, pertaining to the process of scientific thinking, the metaphor may be fundamentally misleading. Research is reviewed indicating that processes of scientific thinking differ significantly in children, lay adults, and scientists. Hence, it is the instruments of scientific thinking, not just the products, that undergo "strong restructuring" (Carey, 1986). A framework for conceptualizing development of scientific thinking processes is proposed, centering on progressive differentiation and coordination of theory and evidence. This development is metacognitive, as well as strategic. It requires thinking about theories, rather than merely with them, and thinking about evidence, rather than merely being influenced by it, and, hence, reflects the attainment of control over the interaction of theories and evidence in one's own thinking.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, it appears that children (and even some adults) do not make the same sharp distinction between theories and evidence that scientists do (Carey, Evans, Honda, Jay, & Unger, 1989; D. Kuhn, 1989; D. Kuhn, Amsel, & O'Loughlin, 1988).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as D. Kuhn, 1989
In the citing paper
“A large body of developmental research indicates that children (and even many adults) are deficient in their understanding of such methodological matters as controlled experimentation and the interpretation of covariation information (e.g., Gil & Carrascosa, 1985;Kuhn, 1989;Kuhn et al., 1988;Schauble, 1990;Shaklee & Elek, 1988;Shaklee & Goldston, 1989).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Kuhn, 1989
In the citing paper
“a.An explicit understanding of the relationship between theory and evidence (Kuhn, 1989).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Kuhn, 1989
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
The growth of logical thinking: From childhood to adolescence.
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958) · Basic Books · doi:10.1037/10034-000 · Cited by 4,607
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184495 · Cited by 4,196
Conceptual Change in Childhood
Carey, S. E. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,851
Review of Child Development Research
Walters, J., Hoffman, M. L., & Hoffman, L. W. (1965) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/349834 · Cited by 3,658
The Psychology Of Intelligence
Piaget, J. (2005) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203981528 · Cited by 3,032
Miller, G. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1982) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1982.1.1.83 · Cited by 2,862
Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human Intelligence
Clarke, A. M., & Sternberg, R. J. (1986) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121332 · Cited by 2,856
The role of theories in conceptual coherence.
Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.92.3.289 · Cited by 2,805
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 777
Strategic decision-making: how some management teams make better strategic decisions
Cohen, H. B., & May, K. (2025) · Strategy and Leadership · doi:10.1108/sl-11-2024-0126 · Cited by 6
Higher Order Thinking and Knowledge
Alexander, P. A., Dinsmore, D. L., Fox, E., Grossnickle, E. M., Loughlin, S. M., Maggioni, L., Parkinson, M. M., & Winters, F. I. (2011) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-61735-507-320251005 · Cited by 6
Modelling Undergraduate Research and Inquiry – Why Enculturation matters
Langemeyer, I. (2019) · Outlines Critical Practice Studies · doi:10.7146/ocps.v20i1.102085 · Cited by 4
Malone, K. L., & Schuchardt, A. M. (2020) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58459-7_14 · Cited by 4
Precise Gravity Terrain Correction of Gravity Exploration for Small Anomalous Bodies
Lee, H.-S., & Rim, H. (2010) · Journal of the Korean earth science society · doi:10.5467/jkess.2010.31.1.001 · Cited by 4
Anomalous graph data and claim revision during argumentation
Berland, L. K., & Lee, V. R. (2010) · International Conference of Learning Sciences · Cited by 4
Pelamonia, J., & Corebima, A. D. (2015) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/15.14.474 · Cited by 4
Stylianidou, F., Glauert, E., Rossis, D., & Havu‐Nuutinen, S. (2015) · Contributions from science education research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20074-3_14 · Cited by 4
Bordoff, S., & Yan, Z. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809481-5.00012-2 · Cited by 4
García, M.-B., Vilanova, S. L., Señoriño, O. A., Medel, G. A., & Natal, M. (2017) · Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior · doi:10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2017.23.3010 · Cited by 4
Kuntze, S. (2004) · Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik · doi:10.1007/bf03339325 · Cited by 4
Children’s Scientific Reasoning Skills in Light of General Cognitive Development
Edelsbrunner, P. A., Schumacher, R., & Stern, E. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108399838.033 · Cited by 4
Eberbach, C. (2009) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 4
Rational analysis and the Lens model
Hastie, R., & Hammond, K. R. (1991) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00070953 · Cited by 4
What do pre-adolescents and adolescents understand about HIV/AIDS?
Rosenthal, D., Waters, L. E., & Glaun, D. E. (1995) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870449508401968 · Cited by 4
Aizikovitsh-Udi, E., & Kuntze, S. (2015) · Cited by 4
Guerrero, M. G., & Puche-Navarro, R. (2015) · Acta Colombiana de Psicología · doi:10.14718/acp.2015.18.2.2 · Cited by 4
A New Metaphor for Teaching: Science Teacher as Anthropologist.
Hodson, D. (2002) · Cited by 4
Rapp, A. F., & Wilkening, F. (2005) · European Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17405620500157920 · Cited by 4
Baron, J. (1991) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00070825 · Cited by 4
Charting Pathways of Conceptual Change in the Use of Computer Software
Kay, R. H. (1994) · Journal of Research on Computing in Education · doi:10.1080/08886504.1994.10782100 · Cited by 4
The subtle (and not so subtle) mind
Hogan, M. (2012) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2012.733724 · Cited by 4
Haria, P. (2010) · ProQuest Demo Repository · Cited by 4
Extraordinary Achievements: A Developmental and Systems Analysis
Moran, S., & Gardner, H. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0221 · Cited by 4
Anthropic thinking about global climate change
Betz, N. (2019) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20318389 · Cited by 4
정주혜, & BAIK, K. H. (2009) · BIOLOGY EDUCATION · doi:10.15717/bioedu.2009.37.4.526 · Cited by 3
Exploring enigmas: Information seeking after exposure to virtual reality awe elicitors
Urban, A. C., & Bossaller, J. (2024) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24882 · Cited by 3
Koenig, K. M., Wood, K. E., & Bao, L. (2021) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1929/1/012060 · Cited by 3
The concept of structural information and possible applications
Bielecki, A., & Stocki, R. (2023) · Philosophical Problems in Science (Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce) · doi:10.59203/zfn.75.654 · Cited by 3
In the Realm of Uncertainty: Quantum Thinking Promotes Tolerance for Ambiguity
Wang, R., & Li, H. (2024) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941241282573 · Cited by 5
Yu, C. H. (2014) · Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science · doi:10.9734/bjesbs/2014/6995 · Cited by 3
Which student problems in experimentation are related to one another?
Baur, A. (2023) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2023.2175334 · Cited by 3
The effects of explicit reasoning on moral judgements
Corral, D., & Rutchick, A. M. (2023) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218231179685 · Cited by 3
Children, Adults, and Machines as Discovery Systems
Klahr, D. (1994) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00993981 · Cited by 3
Cognitive style and scientific process skills in 10-year-old children
Watters, J. J. (1993) · QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) · Cited by 3
Zeng, M. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_26 · Cited by 3
Isik‐Ercan, Z., Kim, B., & Nowak, J. A. (2010) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16318-0_64 · Cited by 3
Training a Bayesian: Three-and-a-half-year-olds' Reasoning about Ambiguous Evidence
Bonawitz, E. B., Fischer, A. S., & Schulz, L. (2008) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 3
Singh, S. K. (2019) · Human Arenas · doi:10.1007/s42087-019-00077-7 · Cited by 4
8 Reflecting on Representation and Process: Children's Understanding of Cognition
Barrett, S. E., Abdi, H., & Sniffen, J. M. (1992) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61011-0 · Cited by 3
Hast, M. (2011) · St Mary's University Repository (ULCC) · doi:10.17863/cam.16488 · Cited by 3
Transitions between Modes of Inquiry in a Rule Discovery Task
Halberstadt, N., & Kareev, Y. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749508401391 · Cited by 3
Response to Reich's 'Do We Need a Theory for the Religious Development of Women?'
DeNicola, K. (1997) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr0702_3 · Cited by 3
Developmentally-based insights for science teaching
Rowell, J. A. (1993) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/bf00592202 · Cited by 3
Lehrer, R., & Lesh, R. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop207013 · Cited by 3
Observations of Urban Middle School Students Engaged in Technology-Supported Inquiry.
Taines, C., Schneider, R. M., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2000) · Cited by 3
Choosing to Learn: Evidence evaluation for active learning and teaching in early childhoodPreprint
Bonawitz, E. B., Bass, I., & Lapidow, E. S. (2018) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/qn7xv · Cited by 3
Park, Y. (2010) · Journal of the Korean earth science society · doi:10.5467/jkess.2010.31.1.106 · Cited by 2
Levy, A. R. (2018) · ProQuest LLC eBooks · doi:10.7916/d8tm8tn5 · Cited by 2
Thinking as an Epistemological Enterprise
Kuhn, D. (1993) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1993.tb00736.x · Cited by 2
Self-citationShort, M. E., & Engel, L. C. (2019) · Climate change management · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32898-6_24 · Cited by 2
Clark, D. B., & Sengupta, P. (2015) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-7363-2.ch003 · Cited by 2
Knowledge evaluation and disciplinary access: mutually supportive for learning
Ash, A. M., & Hand, B. M. (2022) · Learning Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/23735082.2022.2092645 · Cited by 2
Baek, M. J., & Yang, I. H. (2023) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.29333/ejmste/13425 · Cited by 2
Banking and debunking: applying Freirean Theory to the educational challenges of conspiracy culture
Cottrell‐Boyce, A. (2024) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1093/jopedu/qhae020 · Cited by 2
Theory of Learning, Theory of Teaching, and Theory of Mind
Knutsen, J., Frye, D. A., & Sobel, D. M. (2013) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-62396-513-620251018 · Cited by 2
Trader, R. J. (2007) · UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) · Cited by 2
Belief in a Just World and Judgment in Moral Dilemmas
Chaturapanich, T., & Chaiwutikornwanich, A. (2015) · Asian Social Science · doi:10.5539/ass.v11n23p178 · Cited by 3
Trajectories of collaborative scientific conceptual change
Liu, L. (2007) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.3115/1599600.1599766 · Cited by 2
Car, K. B., Pesic, M. H., & Panescu, O. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.233 · Cited by 2
Controlling the message: Preschoolers' use of evidence to teach and deceive others
Rhodes, M., Bonawitz, E. B., Shafto, P., & Chen, A. (2014) · Cited by 2
The Use of Evidence in Young Adolescents' Argumentation
Moore, W. (2013) · doi:10.7916/d8bp0916 · Cited by 2
Enseñanza/Aprendizaje de la ciencia versus historia de la ciencia
Moreno-Cabo, M., & Portolés, J. J. S. (2018) · Educación Química · doi:10.22201/fq.18708404e.1998.2.66571 · Cited by 2
Children's rational exploration
Bonawitz, E. B., & Schulz, L. (2007) · Cited by 2
Designing an augmented reality game-based curriculum
Jan, M., Matthews, J., Holden, C., & Martin, J. (2008) · International Conference of Learning Sciences · doi:10.22318/icls2008.3.45 · Cited by 2
Introduction to Cognition in Science and Technology
Gorman, M. E. (2009) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01034.x · Cited by 2
Tardiff, N., Graves, K. N., & Thompson‐Schill, S. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00472 · Cited by 2
An Overview of the Potential Impact of Cognitive Psychology on School Psychology
Peverly, S. T. (1994) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.1994.12085714 · Cited by 2
Ciencia cognitiva, habilidades del pensar y pedagogía de la ciencia
García-Milà, M., & Martín, M. M. (1991) · Revista Española de Pedagogía · doi:10.22550/2174-0909.1955 · Cited by 2
Naive Theories, Development of
Gelman, S. A. (2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0470018860.s00520 · Cited by 2
Tang, X. (2010) · University Libraries (University of Maryland) · Cited by 2
Nonprobative Photos Inflate the Truthiness and Falsiness of Claims
Newman, E. J. (2013) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17003764.v1 · Cited by 2
TOWARD AN EVOLUTIONARY EPISTEMOLOGY OF SCIENTIFIC REASONING
White, S. H. (1995) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.1995.tb00232.x · Cited by 2
The relationship between formal and informal reasoning
Ohm, E. (2005) · University Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan) · Cited by 2
Rational analysis and illogical inference
Fantino, E. J., & Stolarz‐Fantino, S. (1991) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00070904 · Cited by 2
Metacognitive Experiences in the Domain of Physics: Developmental and Educational Aspects
Gonida, E. Ν., Kiosseoglou, G., & Psillos, D. K. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0165-5_12 · Cited by 2
A Measure for Scientific ThinkingPreprint
Magno, C. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 2
Student conceptions about the field of computer science
Hewner, M. (2012) · SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology) · Cited by 2
Now They See the Point: Improving Science Reasoning Through Making Predictions
Schunn, C. D., & O'Malley, C. (2000) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 2
Vergis, E. (2017) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r3sq8qx5g · Cited by 2
The potential of earth science for the development of primary school science
Balmer, D. (2019) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 2
A Field Guide for Teaching Evolution in the Social SciencesPreprint
Legare, C. H., Opfer, J. E., Busch, J. T. A., & Shtulman, A. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/yrw8z · Cited by 3
Adaptivity and rational analysis
Dickinson, B. (1991) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00070886 · Cited by 1
The causal mind: An affordance-based account of causal engagement
Kolvoort, I. R., Schulz, K., & Rietveld, E. (2023) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/10597123231179486 · Cited by 1
Attitudes in mathematical discovery processes:
Danzer, C. (2024) · LUMAT International Journal on Math Science and Technology Education · doi:10.31129/lumat.12.1.2131 · Cited by 1
Mind over matter: consistency monitoring and domain-specific learning
Bascandziev, I., Abutto, A. B., Walker, C. M., & Bonawitz, E. B. (2025) · Frontiers in Developmental Psychology · doi:10.3389/fdpys.2025.1496651 · Cited by 1
Zhang, T., & Xi, Y. (2025) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.70037 · Cited by 1
Relations Between the Development of False Belief and Scientific Reasoning in Turkish Preschoolers
Saçkes, M., Işıtan, S., Özgül, S. G., Avcı, K., Trundle, K. C., & Sobel, D. M. (2026) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.70093 · Cited by 1
Thurn, C., Peteranderl, S., Edelsbrunner, P. A., Deiglmayr, A., Keller, J., Schumacher, R., & Stern, E. (2026) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102425 · Cited by 1
Adaptive cognition: The question is how
Evans, J. S. B. T. (1991) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00070898 · Cited by 1
The nonoptimality of Anderson's memory fits
Becker, G. M. (1991) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00070837 · Cited by 1
Human cognition is an adaptive process
Agarwal, G. C. (1991) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00070813 · Cited by 1
PENSAMENTO CIENTÍFICO EMPREGADO EM TAREFAS DE FÍSICA BÁSICA
Faria, A. F., & Vaz, A. D. M. (2017) · Investigações em Ensino de Ciências · doi:10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2017v22n1p162 · Cited by 1
Changes in young children’s knowledge regarding shadow and light
김헤라, & Yi, S. (2009) · Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education · doi:10.18023/kjece.2009.29.3.014 · Cited by 1
Gweon, H., & Schulz, L. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
Schmitt, F., Golüke, M., & Budiša, N. (2024) · Frontiers in Synthetic Biology · doi:10.3389/fsybi.2024.1337860 · Cited by 3
Lin, S., & Wang, J. (2024) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/24.23.495 · Cited by 1
Perceptions of Risk and Social Judgments: Biases and Motivational Factors
Bonnie, R. J., O’Connell, M. E., & UnderageDrinking, P. (2004) · Cited by 1
What counts as scientific practice?: a taxonomy of scientists' ways of thinking and doing
Takeuchi, L. M. (2010) · International Conference of Learning Sciences · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhn, D.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kuhn, Deanna
- ORCID
- Kuhn, Deanna
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 674-689
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W1972191699
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 139.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- scientific thinking, children's scientific thinking, scientific reasoning, theory and evidence, metacognition, meta-reasoning, cognitive development, conceptual framework
- MeSH terms
- Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Human Development, Male, Models, Psychological, Problem Solving, Science, Thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review