The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: A comparison of stop, change, and dual-task paradigms.
Abstract
When a letter and a tone are presented in rapid succession, there is substantial interference if both require an overt response (the dual-task paradigm), but there is very little interference if the tone is a signal to inhibit the response to the letter (the slopping paradigm). These effects were replicated under common stimulus conditions in two experiments, and they were compared with effects in a change paradigm, in which the tone required an overt response, like the dual-task paradigm, but was also a signal to inhibit the response to the letter, like the stopping paradigm. In the change paradigm, the overt response to the tone suffered interference only if subjects failed to inhibit the concurrent response to the letter; inhibiting the response to the letter virtually eliminated the interference. The results suggest that differences in response competition are primarily responsible for differences in interference between the dual-task and stopping paradigms. More generally, the results support response-competition interpretations of dual-task interference. In a typical dual-task experiment, people are presented with two stimuli in rapid succession and are required to respond to each stimulus as quickly as possible. Typically, there is substantial interference between the two tasks, particularly when the
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“indicating that adaptive training in conflict resolution tasks improves performance in other tasks also thought to require conflict resolution mechanisms”
From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Logan and Burkell, 1986
Citations
Cites
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
Egeth, H. E., & Kahneman, D. J. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421603 · Cited by 6,976
Lane, S. D. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315506173-8 · Cited by 4,707
On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control
Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.91.3.295 · Cited by 2,590
Self-citationBergum, B. O., Long, J. B., & Baddeley, A. (1982) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422199 · Cited by 2,240
Attention: Some theoretical considerations.
Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0039515 · Cited by 1,922
Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0031333 · Cited by 1,751
On the economy of the human-processing system.
Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.86.3.214 · Cited by 1,737
Parasuraman, R., & DAVIES, D. R. (1984) · Academic Press eBooks · Cited by 1,566
Carterette, E. C., & Friedman, M. P. (1977) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/00006324-197710000-00013 · Cited by 1,566
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 280
Stop or stop-change — does it make any difference for the inhibition process?
Boecker, M., Gauggel, S., & Drueke, B. (2013) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.09.009 · Cited by 59
Countermanding saccades: Evidence against independent processing of go and stop signals
Özyurt, J., Colonius, H., & Arndt, P. A. (2003) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03194573 · Cited by 59
Deficits in behavioral inhibition predict treatment engagement in prison inmates.
Fishbein, D. H., Sheppard, M., Hyde, C., Hubal, R. C., Newlin, D. B., Serin, R. C., Chrousos, G. P., & Alesci, S. (2009) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9163-7 · Cited by 66
The neural antecedents to voluntary action: A conceptual analysis
Nachev, P., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2014) · Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17588928.2014.934215 · Cited by 57
Dimoska, A., & Johnstone, S. J. (2007) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.005 · Cited by 59
Kühn, S., Lorenz, R. C., Weichenberger, M., Becker, M., Haesner, M., O’Sullivan, J. L., Steinert, A., Steinhagen‐Thiessen, E., Brandhorst, S., Bremer, T. S., et al. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.026 · Cited by 60
Training Theory of Mind and Executive Control: A Tool for Improving School Achievement?
Kloo, D., & Perner, J. (2008) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/j.1751-228x.2008.00042.x · Cited by 56
Convolution models for induced electromagnetic responses
Litvak, V., Jha, A., Flandin, G., & Friston, K. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.014 · Cited by 45
The effect of aging on fronto-striatal reactive and proactive inhibitory control
Kleerekooper, I., van Rooij, S. J. H., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., de Leeuw, M., Kahn, R. S., & Vink, M. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.031 · Cited by 54
Decomposing sources of response slowing in the PRP paradigm.
Jentzsch, I., Leuthold, H., & Ulrich, R. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.610 · Cited by 54
“Important for present purposes, De Jong (1993) assumed that delays in R2 performance occur mainly when the interresponse interval is shorter than 200 ms (e.g., Logan & Burkell, 1986 ).”
BackgroundLifespan Changes in Global and Selective Stopping and Performance Adjustments
van de Laar, M. C., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Boxtel, G. J. M. V., & van der Molen, M. W. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00357 · Cited by 51
The Frontal Control of Stopping
Jha, A., Nachev, P., Barnes, G. R., Husain, M., Brown, P., & Vladimir Litvak, A. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv027 · Cited by 57
Bender, A. D., Filmer, H. L., Garner, K., Naughtin, C. K., & Dux, P. E. (2016) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1158-8 · Cited by 65
Kamienkowski, J. E., Pashler, H., Dehaene, S., & Sigman, M. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.010 · Cited by 54
“…there is another one corresponding to response initiation, which is more pronounced when the same effector is used (i.e. bimanual tasks) than when combining effectors that do not share an abstract motor representation as in voice-manual dual-task experiment (De Jong, 1993; Logan & Burkell, 1986).”
BackgroundThe proactive self-control of actions: Time-course of underlying brain activities
Bianco, V., Berchicci, M., Perri, R. L., Spinelli, D., & Russo, F. D. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.043 · Cited by 50
A note on the stop-signal paradigm, or how to observe the unobservable.
Colonius, H. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.2.309 · Cited by 50
“In a later article, Logan and Burkell (1986) introduced specific parametric assumptions for the control-latency distribution.”
BackgroundStopping ability in younger and older adults: Behavioral and event-related potential
Hsieh, S., & Lin, Y. (2016) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-016-0483-7 · Cited by 47
“…van de Laar et al., 2011), and (iii) both age groups exhibited equivalent proactive control effects in which they slowed their responses when anticipating a stop signal, as in the GST and SST blocks (Kleerekooper et al., 2016; Logan & Burkell, 1986; Verbruggen & Logan, 2008; Vink et al., 2005).”
BackgroundCastro-Meneses, L. J., Johnson, B. W., & Sowman, P. F. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00529 · Cited by 49
Contrasting neural effects of aging on proactive and reactive response inhibition
Bloemendaal, M., Zandbelt, B. B., Wegman, J., van de Rest, O., Cools, R., & Aarts, E. (2016) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.06.007 · Cited by 52
van der Schoot, M., Licht, R., Horsley, T. M., & Sergeant, J. A. (2005) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00463.x · Cited by 50
Boonstra, A. M., Kooij, J. J. S., Buitelaar, J. K., Oosterlaan, J., Sergeant, J. A., Heister, J. G. A. M., & Franke, B. (2007) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.30595 · Cited by 47
The development of selective inhibitory control: The influence of verbal labeling
Kray, J., Kipp, K. H., & Karbach, J. (2009) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.10.006 · Cited by 45
Post-stop-signal slowing: Strategies dominate reflexes and implicit learning.
Bissett, P. G., & Logan, G. D. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0025429 · Cited by 44
Self-citationInhibiting prepared and ongoing responses: Is there more than one kind of stopping?
Morein‐Zamir, S., Nagelkerke, P., Chua, R., Franks, I. M., & Kingstone, A. F. (2004) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196733 · Cited by 44
When response inhibition is followed by response reengagement: an event-related fMRI study
Boecker, M., Drueke, B., Vorhold, V., Knops, A., Philippen, B., & Gauggel, S. (2011) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21001 · Cited by 42
Bayesian analysis of the piecewise diffusion decision model
Holmes, W. R., & Trueblood, J. S. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0901-y · Cited by 43
Towards Conceptual Clarification of Proactive Inhibitory Control: A Review
van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Wylie, S. A. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12121638 · Cited by 38
“Whereas the standard version requires a full stop of ongoing actions, the stop-change variant captures the ability to stop an ongoing action and initiate an alternative action instead upon the presentation of an external stimulus [4,50].”
BackgroundResultThe 42nd Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture
Logan, G. D. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1008020 · Cited by 48
Self-citationLooking before you leap: A theory of motivated control of action
Liddle, E. B., Scerif, G., Hollis, C. P., Batty, M. J., Groom, M. J., Mario Liotti, A., & Liddle, P. F. (2009) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.006 · Cited by 40
Ramakrishnan, A., Sureshbabu, R., & Murthy, A. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3668-11.2012 · Cited by 38
Are high-impulsive and high risk-taking people more motor disinhibited in the presence of incentive?
Rodríguez‐Fornells, A., Lorenzo‐Seva, U., & Pueyo, A. A. (2002) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00068-x · Cited by 42
“The same results have been found in the studies of Logan and Burkell (1986), Logan and Cowan (1984) and Logan et al. (1984).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialScene complexity modulates degree of feedback activity during object detection in natural scenes
Groen, I. I. A., Jahfari, S., Seijdel, N., Ghebreab, S., Lamme, V. A. F., & Scholte, H. S. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006690 · Cited by 37
Response inhibition during perceptual decision making in humans and macaques
Middlebrooks, P. G., & Schall, J. D. (2013) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0599-6 · Cited by 34
Response inhibition and response monitoring in a saccadic double-step task in schizophrenia
Thakkar, K. N., Schall, J. D., Logan, G. D., & Park, S. (2015) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2015.01.007 · Cited by 35
Self-citationAttentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
Herdman, C. M. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.18.2.460 · Cited by 35
Umiltà, C. A., Nicoletti, R., Simion, F., Tagliabue, M., & Bagnara, S. (1992) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541449208406241 · Cited by 35
Optimal performance in a countermanding saccade task
Wong‐Lin, K., Eckhoff, P. A., Holmes, P. J., & Cohen, J. D. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.018 · Cited by 34
Proactive inhibitory control varies with task context
Wardak, C., Ramanoël, S., Guipponi, O., Boulinguez, P., & Hamed, S. B. (2012) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08264.x · Cited by 41
Additive factors analysis of inhibitory processing in the stop-signal paradigm
van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & van der Molen, M. W. (2004) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.006 · Cited by 32
Fehring, D. J., Illipparampil, R., Acevedo, N., Jaberzadeh, S., Fitzgerald, P. B., & Mansouri, F. A. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.011 · Cited by 33
Bompas, A., Campbell, A. E., & Sumner, P. (2020) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000181 · Cited by 36
Stopping while going! Response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference.
Yamaguchi, M., Logan, G. D., & Bissett, P. G. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0023918 · Cited by 31
Self-citationHow to stop or change a motor response: Laplacian and independent component analysis approach
Rangel‐Gomez, M., Knight, R. T., & Krämer, U. M. (2015) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.01.012 · Cited by 29
Motor limitation in dual-task processing with different effectors
Bratzke, D., Ulrich, R., Rolke, B., Schröter, H., Jentzsch, I., & Leuthold, H. (2008) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210701536856 · Cited by 27
Spatial Frequency Information Modulates Response Inhibition and Decision-Making Processes
Jahfari, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Scholte, H. S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076467 · Cited by 27
Morein‐Zamir, S., & Meiran, N. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980244000495 · Cited by 27
On the Rational Boundedness of Cognitive Control: Shared Versus Separated RepresentationsPreprint
Musslick, S., Saxe, A., Hoskin, A. N., Sagiv, Y., Reichman, D., Petri, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jkhdf · Cited by 34
Drueke, B., Boecker, M., Schlaegel, S. M. A., Moeller, O., Hiemke, C., Gründer, G., & Gauggel, S. (2010) · Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental · doi:10.1002/hup.1141 · Cited by 28
Effects of probability bias in response readiness and response inhibition on reaching movements
Federico, P., & Mirabella, G. (2014) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-014-3846-8 · Cited by 26
“these experiments have consistently shown that the increase in the likelihood of stop-signal presentation leads to a progressive lengthening of the Rts of no-stop trials but does not affect response inhibition (i.e., the length of the ssRt; logan and Burkell 1986; Ramautar et al. 2004; lansbergen et al. 2007; Verbrugg…”
InfluentialPerception in action: multiple roles of sensory information in action control
Hommel, B. (2005) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-004-0040-0 · Cited by 26
Preparation, adjustment and inhibition of responses
Band, G. P. H. (1997) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · Cited by 26
The ABCD stop signal data: Response to Bissett et al.
Garavan, H., Chaarani, B., Hahn, S., Allgaier, N. A., Juliano, A., Yuan, D. K., Orr, C., Watts, R., Wager, T., de Leon, O. R., et al. (2022) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101144 · Cited by 25
Tenenbaum, G., Levy‐Kolker, N., Bar‐Eli, M., & Weinberg, R. S. (1994) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640419408732203 · Cited by 25
Control in Response Inhibition
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118920497.ch6 · Cited by 25
“Influences of Proactive Control on Stopping Proactive control does not necessarily influence SSRT (Logan & Burkell, 1986; Verbruggen & Logan, 2009b).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationDual-task interference as an indicator of on-line programming in simple movement sequences.
Ketelaars, M. A. C., Khan, M. A., & Franks, I. M. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.25.5.1302 · Cited by 24
Generalized motor inhibitory deficit in Parkinson’s disease patients who freeze
Bissett, P. G., Logan, G. D., van Wouwe, N. C., Tolleson, C., Phibbs, F. T., Claassen, D. O., & Wylie, S. A. (2015) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-015-1454-9 · Cited by 25
Self-citationTraining voluntary motor suppression with real-time feedback of motor evoked potentials
Majid, D. S. A., Lewis, C., & Aron, A. R. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00992.2014 · Cited by 23
“…focused on having participants repeatedly practice the reactive stopping of action; however, these have had mixed success (e.g., Berkman et al. 2014; Chevalier et al. 2014; Cohen and Poldrack 2008; Enge et al. 2014; Logan and Burkell 1986; Schapkin et al. 2007; and reviewed by Spierer et al. 2013).”
BackgroundCará, V. M., Esper, N. B., de Azeredo, L. A., Iochpe, V., Dalfovo, N. P., Santos, R. C., Sanvicente‐Vieira, B., Grassi‐Oliveira, R., Franco, A. R., & Buchweitz, A. (2019) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsz092 · Cited by 22
Associatively mediated stopping: Training stimulus-specific inhibitory control
Bowditch, W. A., Verbruggen, F., & McLaren, I. P. L. (2015) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/s13420-015-0196-8 · Cited by 22
Response time distributions: Some simple effects of factors selectively influencing mental processes
Schweickert, R., & Giorgini, M. (1999) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03212330 · Cited by 22
Verbruggen, F., & McLaren, R. (2016) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-016-0827-5 · Cited by 21
Inhibitory Control Processes and the Strategies That Support Them during Hand and Eye Movements
Schmitt, L., Ankeny, L. D., Sweeney, J. A., & Mosconi, M. W. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01927 · Cited by 22
Measuring online volitional response control with a continuous tracking task
Morein‐Zamir, S., Chua, R., Franks, I. M., Nagelkerke, P., & Kingstone, A. F. (2006) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193896 · Cited by 21
Lie, truth, lie: the role of task switching in a deception context
Debey, E., Liefooghe, B., Houwer, J. D., & Verschuère, B. (2014) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-014-0582-4 · Cited by 21
Fishbein, D. H., Todd, A. C., Ricketts, E. P., & Semba, R. D. (2008) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2008.07.012 · Cited by 21
“The Logan Stop-Change Task (SCT) measures an aspect of inhibition that involves the ability to shift responses in light of new information (see Logan and Burkell, 1986), a function which has been shown to activate the right hemispheric anterior cingulate cortex, supplementary motor area, and…”
MethodMontalti, M., Calbi, M., Cuccio, V., Umiltà, M. A., & Gallese, V. (2021) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-021-01512-7 · Cited by 21
Common and Unique Neurophysiological Processes That Support the Stopping and Revising of Actions
Hervault, M., & Wessel, J. R. (2025) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1537-24.2025 · Cited by 20
Inhibitory control training in preschool children with typical development: an RCT study
Ghodrati, S., Askari-Nejad, M. S., Sharifian, M., & Nejati, V. (2019) · Early Child Development and Care · doi:10.1080/03004430.2019.1691544 · Cited by 23
“…of Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran Although preliminary studies to improve inhibitory control reported that inhibitory control is untrainable (Cohen & Poldrack, 2008; Logan & Burkell, 1986), but there are emerging shreds of evidence of training and improving inhibitory control.”
BackgroundChowdhury, N. S., Livesey, E. J., & Harris, J. A. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01597 · Cited by 20
“…in SSRT after training (Enge et al., 2014; Cohen & Poldrack, 2008), whereas others have shown improvements (Guerrieri, Nederkoorn, & Jansen, 2008; Logan & Burkell, 1986) as well as training-related neuroplasticity in prefrontal brain regions involved in response inhibition (Aasvik et al., 2017;…”
BackgroundStrategies for stimulus selective stopping in the elderly
Hsieh, S., & Lin, Y. (2017) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.12.011 · Cited by 19
Yamaguchi, M., Logan, G. D., & Li, V. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0030431 · Cited by 19
“There is also evidence that implies that the bottleneck may be a process that is closely related to response initiation/execution (e.g., Logan & Burkell, 1986; Ulrich et al., 2006).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEnriquez‐Geppert, S., Eichele, T., Specht, K., Kugel, H., Pantev, C., & Huster, R. J. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22002 · Cited by 21
“To do so, a flanker and a stop-change paradigm [de Jong et al., 1995; Logan and Burkell, 1986] were combined.”
MethodDopaminergic medication shifts the balance between going and stopping in Parkinson's disease
Wylie, S. A., van Wouwe, N. C., Godfrey, S. G., Bissett, P. G., Logan, G. D., Kanoff, K. E., Claassen, D. O., Neimat, J. S., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.032 · Cited by 19
“…instructing participants to merely stop their reactions on stop trials, we asked them to stop their reaction (Bissett and Logan, 2013) and execute an alternative response instead (i.e., a stop-change paradigm; Logan and Burkell, 1986; Verbruggen and Logan, 2009a; van den Wildenberg et al., 2017).”
Self-citationResponse-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution
Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2010) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.016 · Cited by 19
Manasse, S. M., Lampe, E. W., Gillikin, L. M., Payne‐Reichert, A., Zhang, F., Juarascio, A. S., & Forman, E. M. (2020) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23225 · Cited by 19
“In an adaptation of other control conditions in ICT trials (Berkman, Kahn, & Merchant, 2014; Logan & Burkell, 1986) including our own (Forman et al., 2019), the sham training will contain the same proportion of food to nonfood stimuli as ICT but no “No Go” signals will not occur (i.e., participants…”
MethodRationalizing Constraints on the Capacity for Cognitive ControlPreprint
Musslick, S., & Cohen, J. D. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vtknh · Cited by 29
Development of response activation and inhibition in a selective stop-signal task
van de Laar, M. C., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Boxtel, G. J. M. V., & van der Molen, M. W. (2014) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.06.003 · Cited by 20
Thakkar, K. N., van den Heiligenberg, F. M., Kahn, R. S., & Neggers, S. F. W. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23209 · Cited by 19
Attentional enhancement to NoGo stimuli in anxious children
Baving, L., Rellum, T., Laucht, M., & Schmidt, M. H. (2004) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-004-0116-0 · Cited by 18
“The second, neuropsychologically-based line of research examinesinhibitory control in anxious children using the stop-signal task (Logan et al., 1984) and the change task, a modification of the stop-signal task exerting higher demands on inhibitory control ( Logan and Burkell, 1986; De Jong et al., 1995).”
Individual differences in the efficiency of word recognition.
Herdman, C. M., & LeFevre, J. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.84.1.95 · Cited by 17
The psychological refractory period of stopping.
Horstmann, G. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.965 · Cited by 16
Reward prospect affects strategic adjustments in stop signal task
Giuffrida, V., Marc, I. B., Ramawat, S., Fontana, R., Fiori, L., Bardella, G., Fagioli, S., Ferraina, S., Brunamonti, E., & Pani, P. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125066 · Cited by 17
Salomoni, S. E., Gronau, Q. F., Heathcote, A., Matzke, D., & Hinder, M. R. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-46592-0 · Cited by 15
Predictability influences stopping and response control.
Morein‐Zamir, S., Chua, R., Franks, I. M., Nagelkerke, P., & Kingstone, A. F. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.149 · Cited by 16
Corneil, B. D., Cheng, J. C., & Goonetilleke, S. C. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2543-12.2013 · Cited by 15
Perception-action coupling and S-R compatibility
de Jong, R. (1995) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(95)00036-t · Cited by 15
Processes of anticipatory postural adjustment and step movement of gait initiation
Mizusawa, H., Jono, Y., Iwata, Y., Kinoshita, A., & Hiraoka, K. (2017) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2017.01.003 · Cited by 15
Elchlepp, H., & Verbruggen, F. (2016) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.10.005 · Cited by 14
Effects of aging on temporal predictive mechanisms of speech and hand motor reaction time
Johari, K., den Ouden, D., & Behroozmand, R. (2018) · Aging Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1007/s40520-018-0902-4 · Cited by 16
“While some studies have found that movement inhibition is not sensitive to the predictability of sensory stimuli [15, 23], others indicated that temporally predictable sensory stimuli can accelerate movement inhibition compared to unpredictable stimuli [6, 9, 10].”
BackgroundStockdale, L., Morrison, R., & Silton, R. L. (2019) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13467 · Cited by 13
From eyes to hands: Transfer of learning in the Simon task across motor effectors
Verghese, A., Mattingley, J. B., Palmer, P. E., & Dux, P. E. (2017) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-017-1427-1 · Cited by 14
“…on paradigms in which participants are required to respond as quickly as possible to one set of stimuli but withhold their responses to the same set when a signal is presented following a variable delay (Berkman, Kahn, & Merchant, 2014; Logan & Burkell, 1986; Manuel, Bernasconi, & Spierer, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialDykstra, T., Waller, D. A., Hazeltine, E., & Wessel, J. R. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01503 · Cited by 13
“However, it would be prudent for future work to develop a version of the SST that addresses this residual confound (e.g., by combining our novel SST with a stop change paradigm; cf. Verbruggen & Logan, 2009; Logan & Burkell, 1986).”
BackgroundBissett, P. G., Hagen, M. P., Jones, H. M., & Poldrack, R. A. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.05.08.084707 · Cited by 13
“Values greater than ⅓ are somewhat rare, perhaps because there is a belief that high stop probabilities may fundamentally change the stop process (but see Bissett & Logan, 2011; Logan & Burkell, 1986).”
van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., van Wouwe, N. C., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Neimat, J. S., Elias, W. J., Bashore, T. R., & Wylie, S. A. (2021) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113124 · Cited by 12
“The stop-change task [35,36] captures both the stopping and the changing components that are necessary to override ongoing motor actions.”
Johari, K., & Behroozmand, R. (2018) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2018.03.028 · Cited by 12
Stopping and Restarting an Unfolding Action at Various Times
McGarry, T., Chua, R., & Franks, I. M. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980244000549 · Cited by 13
Ehrenstein, A., Schweickert, R., Choi, S., & Proctor, R. W. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/713755734 · Cited by 12
Stopping Speed in Response to Auditory and Visual Stop Signals Depends on Go Signal Modality
Weber, S., Salomoni, S. E., George, R. J. S., & Hinder, M. R. (2024) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02171 · Cited by 11
Compatibility Effects in Stopping and Response Initiation in a Continuous Tracking Task
Morein‐Zamir, S., Nagelkerke, P., Chua, R., Franks, I. M., & Kingstone, A. F. (2006) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210500416375 · Cited by 12
Ridderinkhof, K. R., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1109837 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- ORCID
- Logan, Gordon D.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 1986
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 549-563
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W1971052805
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (8510365)
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- dual-task interference, response competition, response inhibition, response-dependence, overt response
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
