Cited by 142Primate Behavior and EcologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Uncertain responses by humans and Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in a psychophysical same–different task.

Shields, Wendy E., Smith, J. David, Washburn, David A.·1997·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

The authors asked whether animals, like humans, use an uncertain response adaptively to escape indeterminate stimulus relations. Humans and monkeys were placed in a same-different task, known to be challenging for animals. Its difficulty was increased further by reducing the size of the stimulus differences, thereby making many same and different trials difficult to tell apart. Monkeys do escape selectively from these threshold trials, even while coping with 7 absolute stimulus levels concurrently. Monkeys even adjust their response strategies on short time scales according to the local task conditions. Signal-detection and optimality analyses confirm the similarity of humans' and animals' performances. Whereas associative interpretations account poorly for these results, an intuitive uncertainty construct does so easily. The authors discuss the cognitive processes that allow uncertainty's adaptive use and recommend further comparative studies of metacognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-3445.126.2.147

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shields, W. E., Smith, J. D., & Washburn, D. A.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
1997
Volume
126
Issue
2
Pages
147-164
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2073687691
Cited by
142
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD06016, P01HD006016)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
uncertainty, metacognition, same-different task, rhesus monkeys, human-animal comparison, signal detection, response strategies, stimulus discrimination, associative learning, comparative cognition
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Attention, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Macaca mulatta, Male, Problem Solving, Psychophysics, Sensory Thresholds, Species Specificity, Transfer, Psychology, Contrast Sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review