Cited by 96Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyCognitive Functions and Memory

Directed forgetting of recently recalled autobiographical memories.

Barnier, Amanda J., Conway, Martin A., Mayoh, Lyndel, Speyer, Joanne, Avizmil, Orit, Harris, Celia B.·2007·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

In 6 experiments, the authors investigated list-method directed forgetting of recently recalled autobiographical memories. Reliable directed forgetting effects were observed across all experiments. In 4 experiments, the authors examined the impact of memory valence on directed forgetting. The forget instruction impaired recall of negative, positive, and neutral memories equally, although overall, participants recalled fewer unemotional memories than emotional memories. The preexisting organization of memories enhanced the directed forgetting effect, and a release from forgetting occurred only when the forgotten memories were directly cued. The authors discuss the roles of emotion, retrieval dynamics, and organization in these effects and suggest that the directed forgetting of recently recalled autobiographical memories may reflect the inhibition of recently formed memories of remembering, that is, episodic inhibition. The authors consider the implications of these findings for the control of autobiographical remembering in everyday life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.301

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals can intentionally forget and suppress autobiographical memories.

    “Interestingly, it has been shown that individuals can intentionally forget and suppress autobiographical memories (Barnier et al., 2007;Joslyn & Oakes, 2005;Noreen & MacLeod, 2013).”

    From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Barnier et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnier, A. J., Conway, M. A., Mayoh, L., Speyer, J., Avizmil, O., & Harris, C. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2007-05
Volume
136
Issue
2
Pages
301-322
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2078214916
Cited by
96
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (DP0449447)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (R000239395)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
directed forgetting, autobiographical memory, memory valence, emotional memory, memory organization, retrieval dynamics, memory control
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Autobiographies as Topic, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Psychology, Mental Recall, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review