The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence.
Abstract
The authors bring together approaches from cognitive and individual differences psychology to model characteristics of reaction time distributions beyond measures of central tendency. Ex-Gaussian distributions and a diffusion model approach are used to describe individuals' reaction time data. The authors identified common latent factors for each of the 3 ex-Gaussian parameters and for 3 parameters central to the diffusion model using structural equation modeling for a battery of choice reaction tasks. These factors had differential relations to criterion constructs. Parameters reflecting the tail of the distribution (i.e., tau in the ex-Gaussian and drift rate in the diffusion model) were the strongest unique predictors of working memory, reasoning, and psychometric speed. Theories of controlled attention and binding are discussed as potential theoretical explanations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach.
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309 · Cited by 3,078
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189 · Cited by 1,679
Self-citationModeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions
Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00067 · Cited by 1,478
Intelligence and the Frontal Lobe: The Organization of Goal-Directed Behavior
Duncan, J., Emslie, H., Williams, P., Johnson, R., & Freer, C. (1996) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0008 · Cited by 902
Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196302 · Cited by 838
Leth-Steensen, C., King Elbaz, Z., & Douglas, V. I. (2000) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00019-6 · Cited by 580
Cited by
Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history
Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007 · Cited by 1,630
“They have been used to study individual differences in IQ, working memory, and reading measures [120–123], and to examine deficits in populations such as aphasics [164], older adults and children [13,14,121,122], children [165], low literacy adults [166], dyslexics [167], attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD…”
BackgroundMethodReaction time variability in ADHD: A meta-analytic review of 319 studies
Kofler, M. J., Rapport, M. D., Sarver, D. E., Raiker, J. S., Orban, S. A., Friedman, L. M., & Kolomeyer, E. G. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.06.001 · Cited by 648
Chapter 2 Design for a Working Memory
Oberauer, K. (2009) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(09)51002-x · Cited by 636
Self-citationWhat is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it?
Wilhelm, O., Hildebrandt, A., & Oberauer, K. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00433 · Cited by 468
Self-citationVerbruggen, F., Chambers, C. D., & Logan, G. D. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612457390 · Cited by 386
Evaluating vigilance deficits in ADHD: A meta-analysis of CPT performance.
Huang-Pollock, C. L., Karalunas, S. L., Tam, H., & Moore, A. N. (2012) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027205 · Cited by 359
Effects and mechanisms of working memory training: a review
von Bastian, C. C., & Oberauer, K. (2014) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-013-0524-6 · Cited by 318
Self-citationIntraindividual Variability in ADHD and Its Implications for Research of Causal Links
Kuntsi, J., & Klein, C. (2011) · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2011_145 · Cited by 138
Distinct transfer effects of training different facets of working memory capacity.
von Bastian, C. C., & Oberauer, K. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.02.002 · Cited by 139
Self-citationKaralunas, S. L., Huang-Pollock, C. L., & Nigg, J. T. (2012) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0029936 · Cited by 104
Heterogeneity in ADHD: Neurocognitive predictors of peer, family, and academic functioning
Kofler, M. J., Sarver, D. E., Spiegel, J. A., Day, T. N., Harmon, S. L., & Wells, E. L. (2017) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2016.1205010 · Cited by 94
Working memory updating and binding training: Bayesian evidence supporting the absence of transfer.
De Simoni, C., & von Bastian, C. C. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000453 · Cited by 84
Does working memory training have to be adaptive?
von Bastian, C. C., & Eschen, A. (2016) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0655-z · Cited by 83
Kofler, M. J., Alderson, R. M., Raiker, J. S., Bolden, J., Sarver, D. E., & Rapport, M. D. (2014) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000050 · Cited by 67
Alderson, R. M., Rapport, M. D., Kasper, L. J., Sarver, D. E., & Kofler, M. J. (2012) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2011.631905 · Cited by 67
Weigard, A., & Sripada, C. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science · doi:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.02.001 · Cited by 43
Working Memory and Information Processing in ADHD: Evidence for Directionality of Effects
Kofler, M. J., Soto, E. F., Fosco, W. D., Irwin, L. N., Wells, E. L., & Sarver, D. E. (2020) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000598 · Cited by 42
“Information processing speed and working memory abilities show strong latent associations (r=.68; Schmiedek et al., 2007).”
McAuley, T., Crosbie, J., Charach, A., & Schachar, R. (2017) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-016-0189-x · Cited by 12
The cost of perspective switching: Constraints on simultaneous activation
Segal, D. (2025) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02633-x · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H.-M., & Wittmann, W. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 414-429
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2142595182
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 12.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
