Cited by 115AI-based Problem Solving and PlanningVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesSport Psychology and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The acquisition of robust and flexible cognitive skills.

Open access
Taatgen, Niels A., Huss, David, Dickison, Daniel, Anderson, John R.·2008·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

The authors introduce a model of skill acquisition that incorporates elements of both traditional models and models based on embedded cognition by striking a balance between top-down and bottom-up control. A knowledge representation is used in which pre- and postconditions are attached to actions. This model captures improved performance due to learning not only in terms of shorter solution times and lower error rates during the task but also in an increased flexibility to solve similar problems and robustness against unexpected events. In 3 experiments using a complex aviation task, the authors contrasted instructions that explicitly stated pre- and postconditions with conventional instructions that did not. The instructions with pre- and postconditions led to better and more robust performance than other instructions, especially on problems that required transfer. The parameters of the model were estimated to obtain a quantitative fit of the results of Experiment 1, which was then successfully used to predict the results of Experiments 2 and 3.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-3445.137.3.548

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 115

Metadata

Authors
Taatgen, N. A., Huss, D., Dickison, D., & Anderson, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2008
Volume
137
Issue
3
Pages
548-565
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2149826736
Cited by
115
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
19.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NRA2-38169)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA-95500710359)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
skill acquisition, embedded cognition, top-down and bottom-up control, preconditions and postconditions, knowledge representation, transfer of learning, explicit instruction, cognitive flexibility
MeSH terms
Attention, Aviation, Cognition, Computer Graphics, Computer Simulation, Concept Formation, Humans, Learning, Models, Psychological, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Practice, Psychological, Problem Solving, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Transfer, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review