Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior.
Abstract
Four competing theories of health-protective behavior are reviewed: the health belief model, the theory of reasoned action, protection motivation theory, and subjective expected utility theory. In spite of their commonalities, these models are seldom tested against one another. The review points out the similarities and differences among these theories and the data and analyses needed to compare them. In addition to describing the content of the models, their conceptualization of key variables, and the combinatorial rules used to make predictions, some general problems in theory development and testing for health behaviors are examined. The article's goal is to help investigators design studies that will clarify the strengths and weaknesses of these models, leading toward a better understanding of health behavior.
Cites (6)
- From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned BehaviorAjzen, Icek · 1985 · Action Control
- Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change.Prochaska, James O., DiClemente, Carlo C. · 1983 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- The Health Belief Model: a decade later.Janz, Nancy K., Becker, Marshall H. · 1984 · Health Education Quarterly
- Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral controlAjzen, Icek, Madden, Thomas J · 1986 · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude changeMaddux, James E, Rogers, Ronald W · 1983 · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactionsLeventhal, Howard, Diefenbach, Michael, Leventhal, Elaine A. · 1992 · Cognitive Therapy and Research
Cited by (41)
- Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation researchCane, James, O’Connor, Denise, Michie, Susan · 2012 · Implementation Science
- Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
- Modeling health behavior change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors.Schwarzer, Ralf · 2008 · Applied Psychology
- The Affect HeuristicSlovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa, Peters, Ellen, MacGregor, Donald G. · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
- Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventionsNoar, Seth M., Benac, Christina N., Harris, Melissa S. · 2007 · Psychological Bulletin
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-6133.12.4.324
- The paper
- Weinstein, N. D. (1993). Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.12.4.324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.