Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 883Behavioral Health and InterventionsHealth and Wellbeing ResearchNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social-cognitive predictors of health behavior: Action self-efficacy and coping self-efficacy.

Open access
Schwarzer, Ralf, Renner, Britta·2000·Health Psychology

Abstract

The effects of social-cognitive variables on preventive nutrition and behavioral intentions were studied in 580 adults at 2 points in time. The authors hypothesized that optimistic self-beliefs operate in 2 phases and made a distinction between action self-efficacy (preintention) and coping self-efficacy (postintention). Risk perceptions, outcome expectancies, and action self-efficacy were specified as predictors of the intention at Wave 1. Behavioral intention and coping self-efficacy served as mediators linking the 3 predictors with low-fat and high-fiber dietary intake 6 months later at Wave 2. Covariance structure analysis yielded a good model fit for the total sample and 6 subsamples created by a median split of 3 moderators: gender, age, and body weight. Parameter estimates differed between samples; the importance of perceived self-efficacy increased with age and weight.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.19.5.487

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Jöreskog, 1993, LISREL 8.03.
  2. 10.1037/0278-6133.13.1.47 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Schwarzer, 1996, Self-efficacy and health behaviors., 163
  4. Wallston, 1994, Theoretically based strategies for health behavior change., 185
  5. 10.1037/0278-6133.12.4.324 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Schwarzer, R., & Renner, B.
Affiliations
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Universität Greifswald (DE)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2000-09
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
487-495
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W1997792653
Cited by
883
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 40
FWCI
11.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
coping self-efficacy, social cognitive theory, health behavior, preventive nutrition, dietary intake, low-fat diet, high-fiber diet, behavioral intention, risk perception, outcome expectations, mediation, moderators, gender differences, age differences, body weight
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Body Weight, Diet, Dietary Fats, Dietary Fiber, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Health Behavior, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.