Cited by 426Behavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and HealthMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

Some problems with social cognition models: A pragmatic and conceptual analysis.

Ogden, Jane·2003·Health Psychology

Abstract

Empirical articles published between 1997 and 2001 from 4 health psychology journals that tested or applied 1 or more social cognition models (theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, health belief model, and protection motivation theory; N = 47) were scrutinized for their pragmatic and conceptual basis. In terms of their pragmatic basis, these 4 models were useful for guiding research. The analysis of their conceptual basis was less positive. First, these models do not enable the generation of hypotheses because their constructs are unspecific; they therefore cannot be tested. Second, they focus on analytic truths rather than synthetic ones, and the conclusions resulting from their application are often true by definition rather than by observation. Finally, they may create and change both cognitions and behavior rather than describe them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.22.4.424

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ogden, J.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Ogden, Jane
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2003-07
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
424-428
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2067393553
Cited by
426
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 26
FWCI
16.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
social cognition models, theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, Health Belief Model, protection motivation theory, health behavior change, hypothesis generation, health psychology research
MeSH terms
Attitude to Health, Cognition, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Perception, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review