The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis.

Whittlesea, Bruce W. A., Williams, Lisa D.·2000·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

Many investigators have observed that the feeling of familiarity is associated with fluency of processing. The authors demonstrated a case in which the feeling of familiarity did not result from fluency per se; they argued that it resulted instead from perceiving a discrepancy between the actual and expected fluency of processing (B. W. A. Whittlesea & L. D. Williams, 1998). In this article, the authors extend that argument. They observed that stimuli that are experienced as strongly familiar when presented in isolation are instead experienced as being novel when presented in a rhyme or semantic context. They interpreted that result to mean that in those other contexts, the subjects brought a different standard to bear in evaluating the fluency of their processing. This different standard caused the subjects to perceive their performance not as discrepant, but as coherent in one case and incongruous in the other. The authors suggest that the perception of discrepancy is a major factor in producing the feeling of familiarity. They further suggest that the occurrence of that perception depends on the task in which the person is engaged when encountering the stimulus, because that task affects the standard that the person will apply in evaluating their processing.

Cites (4)

  1. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
    Zajonc, R. B. · 1980 · American Psychologist
  2. Memory and consciousness.
    Tulving, Endel · 1985 · Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne
  3. Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.
    Mandler, George · 1980 · Psychological Review
  4. What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer.
    Reder, Lynne M., Ritter, Frank E. · 1992 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Show all 4 references

Cited by (7)

  1. The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research
    Yonelinas, Andrew P · 2002 · Journal of Memory and Language
  2. Competition among multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies
    Poldrack, Russell A, Packard, Mark G · 2003 · Neuropsychologia
  3. Functional neuroimaging of autobiographical memory
    Cabeza, Roberto, St Jacques, Peggy · 2007 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  4. The truth about the truth: a meta-analytic review of the truth effect
    Dechêne, Alice, Stahl, Christoph, Hansen, Jochim, Wänke, Michaela · 2010 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
  5. The Science of False Memory
    2005

See all 314

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.26.3.547
The paper
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.26.3.547

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.