The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Illusions of Competence in Monitoring One's Knowledge During Study.
Abstract
The monitoring of one's own knowledge during study suffers from an inherent discrepancy between study and test situations: Judgments of learning (JOLs) are made in the presence of information that is absent but solicited during testing. The failure to discount the effects of that information when making JOLs can instill a sense of competence during learning that proves unwarranted during testing. Using a paired-associates task, the authors examined aspects of the cue-target relationships that seemed likely contributors to such illusions of competence. These aspects have the potential to create differential strengths of a priori and a posteriori associations, that is, the probability with which a cue, when presented alone, elicits the corresponding target versus the perceived association between the cue and the target when both are present. The authors argue that the former has the greater influence on later recall, whereas the latter has the greater influence on JOLs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Monitoring and control are interrelated [93,95].”
From The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as [93]
In the citing paper
“this pattern is consistent with well-documented illusions of competence, whereby learning experiences that feel fluent and well-supported can lead learners to overestimate their level of understanding”
From Socratic Mind: Impact of a Novel GenAI-Powered Formative Assessment Tool on Student Learning and Higher-Order Thinking (2026) · cites this paper as Koriat & Bjork, 2005
Citations
Cites
Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty.
Fischhoff, B. (1975) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.288 · Cited by 1,970
Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning
Koriat, A. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349 · Cited by 1,363
Self-citationWhy People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence
Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01235 · Cited by 1,224
Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known.
Hawkins, S. A., & Hastie, R. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.311 · Cited by 852
The Curse of Knowledge in Economic Settings: An Experimental Analysis
Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G. F., & Weber, M. (1989) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261651 · Cited by 754
Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00147.x · Cited by 580
Gopher, D., & Koriat, A. (1999) · Cited by 550
Self-citationWord association norms : grade school through college
Palermo, D. S., & Jenkins, J. J. (1964) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 537
The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index.
Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.127.1.55 · Cited by 529
Self-citationGilovich, T. D. (2002) · Cited by 513
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–360 of 360
Tester og testtilbakemeldinger som direkte bidragsytere til dypere læring blant studenter
Herrebrøden, H. (2014) · Uniped · doi:10.3402/uniped.v37.23327
Using Knowledge to Become Profoundly Effective
Beaudoin, L. P. (2015)
Andreani, E. (2015) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Re-Conceptualizing Calibration Using Trace Methodology
Egan, R. G., & Zhou, M. (2010) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-61692-901-5.ch005
Reactive Effects of Memory Performance Predictions
Mitchum, A. L. (2011)
Bellinger, D. B. (2016) · doi:10.18297/etd/2513
“Consistent with prior literature (e.g., Karpicke, Butler, & Roediger, 2009; Koriat & Bjork, 2005), the current sample of students struggled to accurately judge their learning.”
ResultBallion, T. T. (2005) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
Friedman, M. C. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Failure to update metacognitive control in response to expected retention intervals
Fiechter, J. L. (2015) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Wolf, A. D. (2017) · doi:10.7916/d8h13dhv
“However, some studies have found adults are not good at making accurate judgments of learning 9 (Koriat & Bjork, 2005; Peverly, Brobst, Graham, & Shaw, 2003; Pressley & Ghatala, 1988; Presseley, Ghatala, Woloshyn, & Pirie, 1990), which has implications for their study strategies.”
BackgroundOverson, C. E. (2011) · University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)
How Metacognitive Awareness Relates to Overconfidence in Interval Judgments
Klein, D., Cunningham, A., & Buchanan, E. M. (2018) · International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities · doi:10.7710/2168-0620.1109
“Metacognition has been the topic of a large body of research, usually focused on the poor calibration of subjects’ judgments of their own learning (Koriat & Bjork, 2005; 2006), which can specifically affect studying for student learners (Metcalfe & Finn, 2008).”
BackgroundResultVillessèche, J., Oriez, S., Besnard, A.-L., Bohec, O. L., Quaireau, C., Noël, Y., de la Haye, F., Jérémie, N., & Lavandier, K. (2019) · Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité · doi:10.4000/apliut.6701
Pan, S. C., Tajran, J., Lovelett, J. T., Osuna, J., & Rickard, T. C. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rvx75
Fluency – Friend or foe for learners?
Devlin-Glass, B. (2009) · ANU Undergraduate Research Journal · doi:10.22459/aurj.01.2009.03 · Cited by 1
Practice tests: do they work? Can they work better?
Karakolidis, A., O’Leary, M., & Scully, D. (2017) · Dublin City University Open Access Institutional Repository (Dublin City University)
Bukoski, E. A. (2018) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)
A tanulási folyamat időbeli eloszlásának és eredményességének vizsgálata a kalkulustanulásban
Berezvai, S., Oláh, T., Pálya, Z., Sipos, B., & Szilágyi, B. (2020) · Opus et Educatio · doi:10.3311/ope.400
A Review of Retrieval Practice and Applications
杨, 简. (2021) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.12677/ap.2021.113076
When to move on to new learning: meta-cognition’s role on updating with incorporation
Smith, W. G. (2019) · NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro)
Voloshyna, V. (2014) · Problems of Psychology in the 21st Century · doi:10.33225/ppc/14.08.184
Acquiring problem-solving skills in higher education
van Harsel, M. (2021) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.33540/697
Rabinowitz, M., & Ingber, J. Z. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-375000-6.00348-7
Holmes, J. D. (2016) · doi:10.1002/9781118760499.ch1
Syal, S., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2022) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102109 · Cited by 1
Confidence judgment in a temporal generalization task : Accuracy and sensitivity to task difficulty
Lamotte, M., Droit‐Volet, S., & Izaute, M. (2017) · L’Année psychologique · doi:10.3917/anpsy.173.0275
Metacognitive Monitoring and Control Processes Underlying Generation-Potentiated LearningPreprint
Alakbarova, D., Peper, P., & Ball, H. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bjzhu
Goodman, S. G., & Moore, E. (2023) · Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.14434/josotl.v23i2.33413 · Cited by 7
“This metacognitive task often results in overconfident judgments, whereby students provide JOL estimates that exceed their actual performance on an assessment (Koriat & Bjork, 2005).”
BackgroundThe Seductive Details Effect in Multimedia Learning
罗, 爽. (2024) · Advances in Social Sciences · doi:10.12677/ass.2024.139786
Research and Enlightenment of the Metacognitive Illusions in Judgment of Learning
王, 景. (2024) · Advances in Social Sciences · doi:10.12677/ass.2024.13111047
Dawson, M. G., Deer, R., & Boguslawski, S. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5055559
Le, N. D. (2025) · Roczniki Psychologiczne · doi:10.18290/rpsych2024.0017
“Despite this, there was still a tacit assumption that JOLs do not affect the underlying memory processes and thus, they continued to be used in meta-memory studies without employing any appropriate measures to examine their potential for reactivity (e.g., Koriat & Bjork, 2005).”
Students Don't Learn the Way They Think They Do in a Large, Active-Learning Genetics Course
Walck-Shannon, E. M., Barton, H. D., Rowell, S. F., Chalker, D. L., & Fink, A. (2025) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.24-10-0251 · Cited by 2
“In self-directed studying, students form “illusions of competence” when they inaccurately over-estimate their own knowledge during metacognitive monitoring (Koriat and Bjork, 2005).”
Seban, P., Šikl, R., & Urban, K. (2025) · Education Inquiry · doi:10.1080/20004508.2025.2522529 · Cited by 5
A Comparative Study: Two Approaches to Project-Based Learning in Statistics for Engineers
Tachie-Menson, E. L., & Rosca, E. V. (2025) · Conference on Information Communications Technology and Society (ICTAS) · doi:10.1109/ictas64866.2025.11155753
Miao, Y.-W., Zhang, J., & Zhang, H. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies : Official Journal of the IFIP technical committee on Education · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13828-7
“In particular, bias in self-evaluation (Koriat & Bjork, 2005), inaccuracy in judging one’s learning status and outcomes, and difficulty in estimating learning progress over time (Porter, 2011) are common challenges.”
From stork to baby: Semantic relatedness can improve order memory without grouping
Ishiguro, S., Guitard, D., & Saint‐Aubin, J. (2026) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-025-02840-0
“Likewise, in paired-associate cued-recall, cue-target pairs with forward associations show a memory advantage over those with backward associations (Koriat & Bjork, 2005).”
Maxwell, N. P., & Adkins, M. (2026) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2026.2645631
“Because JOLs made using this scale type can be easily compared to later test performance, much research has explored the extent to which JOLs can accurately reflect memory (e.g., Arbuckle & Cuddy, 1969; Castel et al., 2007; Koriat & Bjork, 2005; Maxwell et al., 2024; Rhodes & Castel, 2008; etc.).”
Fernandez, J. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/c7ad77ddz9976z4beeza5b9zd163df512099
Ouyang, Y., Gao, S., Shao, Y., Xiong, J., Wang, X., & Li, Q. (2026) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3772363.3798388
“Certain concepts remain resistant to comprehension via passive viewing alone, requiring active engagement and scaffolded reasoning to achieve genuine mastery [26, 46].”
Confidence judgments, feelings of knowing and judgments of learning: Towards a common framework
Koriat, A. (2026) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-026-01874-6 · Cited by 1
“Rather, pairs that have only a weak association will sometimes be perceived as quite strongly related, producing inflated JOLs (e.g., Koriat & Bjork, 2005; Maxwell & Huff, 2021).”
InfluentialSelf-citationMazur’s Peer Instruction in Medical Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Aldalou, M., Kizer, A., Hanley, J. C., Hakim, A. R., Deaver, J., Wilson, A. B., & Brooks, W. S. (2026) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-026-02744-1
Adlakha, V., Arledge, M., McCay, P., Reeves, K., Babatunde, F., & Ewell, S. N. (2026) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.00338-25
“JOLs are influenced by the conditions available during the student’s study period (e.g., having notes available or access to online resources) and can inform student decisions to continue or terminate the study (111).”
Evaluating large language models for pharmacotherapy simulations: a mixed-methods study
Farrag, A. N., El-Zeiny, A., & Ali, A. M. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02626-1 · Cited by 2
“…approaches to standard setting and critical-action gating, severity-strati fi ed medication safety systems, and implementation governance considerations, we propose a risk-strati fi ed quality assurance approach in which review intensity is calibrated to clinical consequence 50,58,60 – 63 .”
Repeated Exposure to Success Harshens Reactions to FailurePreprint
O'Brien, E., & Wald, K. A. (2026) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Alhroot, M., & Rawwad, T. A. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18105129
Zhang, Y., meng, X., & Lin, J. (2026) · ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S) · doi:10.1145/3774398.3811597
“Learning sciences work on metacognition and memory shows that surface performance and learner judgements can over-state later retention and transfer, as in illusions of competence [9, 26].”
An afforded elaboration mechanism of judgment of learning reactivity
Scholten, F., & Niese, Z. A. (2026) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-026-09478-w
“…JOLs overestimate their subsequent memory performance because the intrinsic cue that informed the judgment (i.e., the target is a free associate of the cue word) is no longer present at test (i.e., the cue word is not a free associate of the target; Koriat & Bjork, 2005; Maxwell & Huff, 2021).”
Mora-Ruano, D., & Mora-Ruano, R. (2026) · Ensayos: Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete · doi:10.18239/ensayos.v41i2.3949
Developing UCD Competence Through HCI: A Student Experience Perspective
Hakobyan, L., Gadala, M., & Sowriraghavan, A. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29596-5_29
Chung, M. (2026) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448261459666
First-year medical students’ use of practice questions to understand science courses
Nafisah, B. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1863776
How college students use AI to navigate course readings: evidence from an 8-week study
Fu, Y., Wester, J., van Berkel, N., & Hiniker, A. (2026) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2026.2713505
Cognitive agency and the emergence of epistemic regulation
Proust, J. (2026) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2026.2730652
Belbekri, A., Bouarroudj, W., Benmounah, K., & Medjroubi, M. L. (2026) · Intelligent Data Analysis · doi:10.1177/1088467x261488155
Exploring cognitive–institutional alignment in poetry comprehension: a grade 8 case study in Nepal
Rai, B. (2026) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-026-00474-0
“Koriat and Bjork (2005) discuss discrepancies between learners’ judgments and their actual performance, while Dunning (2011) addresses the relationship between competence and the ability to evaluate one’s own performance.”
Generative AI and the illusion of competence in English language learning
Shakhrizoda, K., & Mohlaroyim, K. (2026) · Science and Innovation: Republican Scientific and Practical Conference · doi:10.70413/si-v04-i68-s55712
The Neural Correlates of Retrospective Memory Monitoring: Convergent Findings from ERP and fMRI
Roper, J. C. (2011) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University)
Metadata
- Authors
- Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Haifa (IL)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-194
- ISSN
- 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1285
- OpenAlex
- W2056938988
- Semantic Scholar
- 4d25bc4f205114d6026550814c8a78075728a4b5
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- judgments of learning, metacognition, self-assessment of knowledge, paired-associate learning, memory retrieval
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Cues, Educational Measurement, Humans, Illusions, Judgment, Learning, Professional Competence, Mental Recall, Vocabulary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review