Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Information that is at odds with perceivers' expectations about the actor further increases the likelihood of extensive attributional processing.
“Finally, information that is at odds with perceivers' expectations about the actor, e.g., because it contradicts what is known about the actor's previous behavior, further increases the likelihood of extensive attributional processing (e.g., Hastie & Kumar, 1979; Srull, 1981).”
From The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies With Bad Reputations (2006) · cites this paper as Srull, 1981
Cites
The serial position effect of free recall.
Murdock, B. B. (1962) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045106 · Cited by 1,717 · see citing works
The use of schemata in the acquisition and transfer of knowledge
Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1979) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(79)90005-7 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dimensions of Consumer Expertise
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209080 · Cited by 4,375 · see citing works
The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies With Bad Reputations
Yoon, Y., Gürhan‐Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_9 · Cited by 1,368 · see citing works
Maintaining Cultural Stereotypes in the Serial Reproduction of Narratives
Kashima, Y. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167200267007 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Effect of schema-incongruent information on memory for stereotypical attributes.
O'Sullivan, C. S., & Durso, F. T. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.55 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Ybarra, O., & Stephan, W. G. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.691 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Keeping up impressions: Inferential rules for impression change across the Big Five
Kammrath, L. K., Ames, D. R., & Scholer, A. A. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.006 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Srull, T. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Srull, Thomas K.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
- Published
- 1981-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 440-463
- ISSN
- 0096-1515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068834287
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- person memory, associative memory, memory retrieval, recognition memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
