Cited by 25Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMental Health Research Topics

Smartphone psychology: New approaches towards safe and efficacious mobile mental health apps.

Marshall, Jamie M., Dunstan, Debra A., Bartik, Warren·2020·Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Abstract

Practicing psychologists are being faced with the reality that mobile mental health apps for smartphones and tablet devices are increasing in popularity. This growth area within e-mental health has been well documented in Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. This article provides an update on the issues of safety and efficacy in mental health app development, two of the biggest concerns that practicing psychologists have about these new digital tools. Governments and medical authorities are wrestling with how to regulate the health app market to avoid harm to users. At the same time, a lack of research into the efficacy and effectiveness of most mental health apps in the various app stores leaves clinicians and consumers with uncertainty. The vast majority of the limited research to date has been completed by those involved in an app’s development. Further independent research and replication are required to demonstrate legitimacy and increase the acceptance of mental health apps as valid sources of therapy. Complicating this issue is disparity about an acceptable methodology for examining the effectiveness of a mental health app. This article proposes a new approach to incorporate multiple baseline single-case designs to increase the amount of evidence and to guide larger-scale randomized controlled trials, something that could and should include practicing psychologists. This novel approach also proposes that mental health apps undergo a new “certification” process with the participation of app store marketplaces.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pro0000278

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marshall, J. M., Dunstan, D. A., & Bartik, W.
Affiliations
University of New England (AU)
Venue
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
Published
2020-06
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
214-222
ISSN
  • 0735-7028 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1323
OpenAlex
W2992218278
Cited by
25
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Professional Psychology Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
mental health apps, mobile application, e-mental health, mobile application security, app efficacy, randomized controlled trials, digital mental health interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review