Cited by 120Animal Behavior and ReproductionPrimate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

A longitudinal study of dominance in an outdoor colony of domestic rats.

Adams, Nelson, Boice, Robert·1983·Journal of Comparative Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7036.97.1.24

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In male rats, fights are generally much more common than in females, but social ranks have been observed also among females.

    “In males, fights are generally much more common than in females, but some authors managed to observe social ranks also among the latter.56,94,111,112”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, N., & Boice, R.
Affiliations
State University of New York (US)
Venue
Journal of Comparative Psychology
Published
1983-03
Volume
97
Issue
1
Pages
24-33
ISSN
  • 0093-4127 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2087
  • 0735-7036
OpenAlex
W2078880311
Cited by
120
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of comparative psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
social dominance, domestic rats, social hierarchy, longitudinal study, animal social behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review