Cited by 110Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala block conditioned excitation, but not conditioned inhibition of fear as measured with the fear-potentiated startle effect.

Falls, William A., Davis, Michael·1995·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Lesions of the amygdala block the expression of fear-potentiated startle following either moderate or extensive light + shock training. The present experiment assessed whether lesions of the amygdala would also block the expression of conditioned inhibition of fear. Rats were given conditioned inhibition training in which a light was paired with shock and a noise and light compound was presented in the absence of shock. Then half of the rats were given bilateral electrolytic lesions of the amygdala and the remaining rats were sham operated. Lesions of the amygdala blocked the expression of fear-potentiated startle to the light. To assess whether conditioned inhibition was disrupted, rats were retrained with light + shock pairings with no further conditioned inhibition training. Amygdala lesioned rats reacquired fear-potentiated startle to the light (Kim & Davis, 1993). Importantly, the noise conditioned inhibitor retained its ability to inhibit fear-potentiated startle to the retrained light. These results indicate that areas of the amygdala critical for initial performance of fear-potentiated startle are not critical for the expression of conditioned inhibition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7044.109.3.379

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The amygdala has been implicated in both threat learning and threat extinction processes.

    “For thirty years, the amygdala has been implicated in both threat learning [48] and threat extinction [49] processes.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falls, W. A., & Davis, M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
1995-06
Volume
109
Issue
3
Pages
379-387
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W4242505194
Cited by
110
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 25642, MH 47840, MH 00004, P01MH025642)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
central amygdala, fear conditioning, conditioned inhibition, fear potentiation, fear-potentiated startle, lesion studies, startle response
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Arousal, Association Learning, Brain Mapping, Conditioning, Classical, Dominance, Cerebral, Electroshock, Fear, Male, Neural Inhibition, Photic Stimulation, Reflex, Startle, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review