Cited by 360Nursing care and researchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence-based psychological treatments for distress in family caregivers of older adults.

Gallagher-Thompson, Dolores, Coon, David W.·2007·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

This review identifies evidence-based psychological treatments (EBTs) for reducing distress, and improving well-being, of family members caring for an older relative with significant cognitive and/or physical impairment. Three categories of psychologically derived treatments met EBT criteria: psychoeducational programs (N = 14 studies), psychotherapy (N = 3 studies), and multicomponent interventions (N = 2 studies). Specifically, support within the psychoeducational category was found for skill-training programs focused on behavior management, depression management, and anger management and for the progressively lowered threshold model. Within the psychotherapy category, cognitive-behavioral therapy enjoys strong empirical support. Within the multicomponent category, programs using a combination of at least 2 distinct theoretical approaches (e.g., individual counseling and support group attendance) were also found to be effective. Suggestions for future research include the development of more well-integrated multicomponent approaches, greater inclusion of ethnically diverse family caregivers in research protocols, and greater incorporation of new technologies for treatment delivery.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.37

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 89 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 360

Metadata

Authors
Gallagher-Thompson, D., & Coon, D. W.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2007-03
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
37-51
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2094437177
Cited by
358
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 19
FWCI
70.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG 18784; AG 13289)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
family caregivers, older adults, caregiver distress, psychological intervention, psychoeducational intervention, psychotherapy, multicomponent intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, anger management, depression treatment, behavior management, support groups, well-being
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Counseling, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review