Cited by 245Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and MemoryAging and Gerontology Research

The relation between source memory and aging.

Schacter, Daniel L., Kaszniak, Alfred W., Kihlstrom, John F., Valdiserri, Michael·1991·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

Previous research has shown that elderly adults have difficulty recalling the source of recently acquired facts but does not indicate whether source memory is more impaired than fact memory. This study examined old and young subjects' memory for novel facts that had been read to them by 1 of 2 experimental sources either in a random order or in a blocked order. When fact memory was equated in young and old at different levels of performance, the elderly exhibited disproportionate source memory deficits in the blocked condition but not in the random condition. Results suggest that the relation between fact and source memory in the elderly varies across experimental conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0882-7974.6.4.559

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Episodic memory, relative to semantic memory, declines rapidly and dramatically with normal ageing.

    “Similarly, episodic memory, relative to semantic memory, declines rapidly and dramatically with normal ageing [10–15].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

  • In humans, episodic memory declines with normal ageing and deteriorates earliest and most dramatically compared to other forms of memory.

    “In humans, episodic memory is well known to decline with normal ageing [10,11] and deteriorates the earliest and most dramaticlly compared to other forms of memory [12–15].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schacter, D. L., Kaszniak, A. W., Kihlstrom, J. F., & Valdiserri, M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
1991
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
559-568
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W1983407897
Cited by
245
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag008441-30)
  • National Institute on Aging (1 RO1 AG08441-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
source memory, aging, older adults, memory impairment, source confusion, age differences in memory
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review