Cited by 36Cephalopods and Marine BiologyMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Episodic-like memory is preserved with age in cuttlefish

Open access
Schnell, Alexandra K., Clayton, Nicola S., Hanlon, Roger T., Jozet-Alves, Christelle·2021·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Episodic memory, remembering past experiences based on unique what–where–when components, declines during ageing in humans, as does episodic-like memory in non-human mammals. By contrast, semantic memory, remembering learnt knowledge without recalling unique what–where–when features, remains relatively intact with advancing age. The age-related decline in episodic memory likely stems from the deteriorating function of the hippocampus in the brain. Whether episodic memory can deteriorate with age in species that lack a hippocampus is unknown. Cuttlefish are molluscs that lack a hippocampus. We test both semantic-like and episodic-like memory in sub-adults and aged-adults nearing senescence ( n = 6 per cohort). In the semantic-like memory task, cuttlefish had to learn that the location of a food resource was dependent on the time of day. Performance, measured as proportion of correct trials, was comparable across age groups. In the episodic-like memory task, cuttlefish had to solve a foraging task by retrieving what–where–when information about a past event with unique spatio-temporal features. In this task, performance was comparable across age groups; however, aged-adults reached the success criterion (8/10 correct choices in consecutive trials) significantly faster than sub-adults. Contrary to other animals, episodic-like memory is preserved in aged cuttlefish, suggesting that memory deterioration is delayed in this species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2021.1052

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a what-where-when study, the performance at test of aged-adult cuttlefish did not differ from sub-adult cuttlefish.

    “However, in a what–where–when study the performance at test of aged-adult cuttlefish did not differ from sub-adult cuttlefish [78]”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [78]

  • Some studies use non-natural methodological elements to test for episodic-like memory, such as pecking or approaching shapes or coloured panels, or requiring subjects to recall their own or others' previous actions out of an array of behaviours.

    “Some studies, however, use non-natural methodological elements to test for episodic-like memory [75], such as pecking or approaching certain shapes or coloured panels that are presented in front of the subjects [56,78–81], or requiring subjects to recall their own or others’ previous actions out of an array of behaviours [95,96].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [78]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [55]von Boletzky S. 1983 Sepia officinalis. In cephalopod life cycles vol. I (ed. PR Boyle), pp. 31- 52. London, UK: Academic Press.
  2. [75]Schnell AK, Clayton NS, Hanlon RT, Jozet-Alves C. 2021 Episodic-like memory is preserved with age in cuttlefish. FigShare. PMC8370807 34403629

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schnell, A. K., Clayton, N. S., Hanlon, R. T., & Jozet-Alves, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Marine Biological Laboratory (US)
  • Normandie Univ., UNICAEN, Univ Rennes, CNRS, UMR EthoS 6552, Caen, France
Corresponding author
Schnell, Alexandra K.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2021-08-18
Volume
288
Issue
1957
Pages
20211052
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W3193663488
Cited by
36
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • European Research Council
  • Grass Foundation
  • Royal Society
  • Fyssen Foundation
  • Australian Government
  • Seventh Framework Programme (3399933, FP7/2007)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Cephalopods and Marine Biology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
episodic-like memory, semantic memory, cuttlefish, aging, senescence, memory decline, hippocampus, foraging behavior, spatiotemporal memory, cephalopods, cognitive aging
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Hippocampus, Mental Recall, Decapodiformes, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review