Cited by 222Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingCounseling Practices and Supervision

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reliability and criterion-related validity of the California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales-Patient Version

Gaston, Louise·1991·Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Aspects of the reliability and criterion-related validity of the patient version of the California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales (CALPAS-P) were examined. The sample consisted of 147 patients consulting in private practice. These patients completed the 24-item CALPAS-P designed to assess 4 alliance dimensions. They also filled out questionnaires on symptomatology (SCL-10), intimacy problems (IIP), social desirability (MC-SDS), and satisfaction (CSQ-8)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1040-3590.3.1.68

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
Gaston, L.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Gaston, Louise
Venue
Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1991-03
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
68-74
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2068692532
Cited by
219
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
therapeutic relationship, reliability statistics, criterion validity, psychotherapy patients, private practice, social desirability, patient satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review