The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Therapeutic effects of providing MMPI-2 test feedback to clients at a university counseling service: A collaborative approach.
Abstract
This study examined the therapeutic effects of sharing Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory—2 (MMPI-2) assessment results with clients. It is based on an earlier study by S. E. Finn and M. E. Tonsager (1992). Participants were 60 university students seeking psychological services from a university counseling service. All participants completed the MMPI-2 and several outcome measures. Within 2 weeks of completing the assessment, clients in the experimental group received test feedback, using a collaborative model developed by S. E. Finn (1996). Clients in the control group received test feedback only after having completed the final outcome measures and following a delay of 1 week. Compared with the control group, those who received test feedback within the time frame of the experimental conditions reported a significant increase in self-esteem immediately following the feedback session and a significant decrease in symptomatic distress at a 2-week follow-up. Overall, the findings provide further evidence for the efficacy of psychological assessment as an effective therapeutic intervention
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“C/TA has been explored in several controlled trials with adults and has been shown to increase a range of process variables related to therapy outcomes. This includes self-esteem [26–29]”
Citations
Cites
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change
Garfield, S. L., Bergin, A. E., & Dryden, W. (1987) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.1.4.264a · Cited by 3,998
Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory.
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076760 · Cited by 3,728
Kohut, H. (2009) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226450155.001.0001 · Cited by 3,469
How we should measure "change": Or should we?
Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0029382 · Cited by 2,456
MMPI-2 : Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 : manual for administration and scoring
Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. (1989) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · Cited by 2,450
Research Methods in Social Relations
(1992) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80303-2 · Cited by 2,086
Lr, D., & Derogatis, L. R. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,027
Cheek, J. M., & Buss, A. H. (1981) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.2.330 · Cited by 1,317
MMPI-2: assessing personality and psychopathology
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-2421 · Cited by 1,152
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Meta-analysis of psychological assessment as a therapeutic intervention
Poston, J. M., & Hanson, W. E. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0018679 · Cited by 276
Interaction of Therapeutic Process and Alliance During Psychological Assessment
Ackerman, S. J., Hilsenroth, M. J., Baity, M. R., & Blagys, M. D. (2000) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa7501_7 · Cited by 192
Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues.
Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., Eisman, E. J., Kubiszyn, T. W., & Reed, G. M. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.56.2.128 · Cited by 1,469
The Effects of Assessment Feedback on Rapport-Building and Self-Enhancement Processes
Allen, A., Montgomery, M., Tubman, J., Frazier, L., & Escovar, L. (2003) · Journal of Mental Health Counseling · doi:10.17744/mehc.25.3.lw7h84q861dw6ytj · Cited by 63
Aldea, M. A., Rice, K. G., Gormley, B., & Rojas, A. (2010) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2010.09.003 · Cited by 40
Aschieri, F., & Smith, J. D. (2012) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.627964 · Cited by 38
Smith, J. D., & George, C. (2012) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.656860 · Cited by 31
Hovmand, O. R., Reinholt, N., Dichmann, K., Borisov, R., & Arnfred, S. (2023) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-023-01332-z · Cited by 3
Collaborative assessment as an intervention in the treatment of mental Illness: a systematic review
Hovmand, O. R., Rejaye Gryesten, J., Storebø, O. J., Reinholt, N., & Arnfred, S. M. (2024) · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/08039488.2024.2357565 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Newman, M. L., & Greenway, P.
- Venue
- Psychological Assessment
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 122-131
- ISSN
- 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-134X
- OpenAlex
- W2156553979
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- MMPI-2, test feedback, collaboration models, university counseling services, university students, self-esteem, outcome measures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review