Cited by 31Psychological Testing and AssessmentPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Therapeutic Assessment Case Study: Treatment of a Woman Diagnosed With Metastatic Cancer and Attachment Trauma

Smith, Justin D., George, Carol·2012·Journal of Personality Assessment

Abstract

This article presents a Therapeutic Assessment (TA) case study of a woman recovering from 4 years of intense medical treatment for stage IV cancer. The inclusion and utility of using the Adult Attachment Projective Picture System (AAP) in the TA is highlighted. The client's attachment classification as unresolved helped identify that her current experiences with dissociation and problems restructuring her life following cancer remission were related to severe childhood sexual abuse, which she had suppressed for decades. The AAP also provided information regarding the unconscious defensive processes the client employed to cope with attachment distress and her inability to find comfort and support from others. These findings were instrumental in guiding the subsequent psychotherapy. The TA process, particularly the assessor-client relationship, facilitated an experience of containing her previously unintegrated and dysregulated affect. A single-case experiment using daily measurements suggested that participation in TA coincided with symptomatic improvements in multiple domains. These improvements were maintained during 4 months of biweekly psychotherapy after the completion of the TA. This case illustrates the applicability of the TA model in health care settings, demonstrates the usefulness of the AAP in the context of TA, and provides empirical support for the effectiveness of the TA model in initiating symptom improvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00223891.2012.656860

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, J. D., & George, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • Mills College (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality Assessment
Published
2012-02-22
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
331-344
ISSN
  • 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7752
OpenAlex
W2070870630
Cited by
31
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
therapeutic assessment, Adult Attachment Projective Picture System, attachment trauma, metastatic cancer, child sexual abuse, dissociation, unresolved attachment, defensive processes, emotion regulation, psychotherapy outcome, symptom improvement, healthcare settings, single-case experiments
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Melanoma, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Psychotherapy, Brief, Remission Induction, Remission, Spontaneous, Repression, Psychology, Skin Neoplasms, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Feedback, Psychological, Qualitative Research, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review