Cited by 320Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

Grounded theory in psychological research.

Henwood, Karen, Pidgeon, Nick·2003·Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/10595-008

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henwood, K., & Pidgeon, N.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Venue
Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design.
Published
2003
Pages
131-155
OpenAlex
W1896284128
Cited by
320
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 24
FWCI
39.84
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
grounded theory, qualitative research methodology, theory development, psychological research methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review