Cited by 48Cognitive Abilities and TestingRace, Genetics, and SocietyEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The cultural malleability of intelligence and its impact on the racial/ethnic hierarchy.

Suzuki, Lisa, Aronson, Joshua·2005·Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Abstract

This commentary highlights previous literature focusing on cultural and environmental explanations for the racial/ethnic group hierarchy of intelligence. Assumptions underlying definitions of intelligence, heritability/genetics, culture, and race are noted. Historical, contextual, and testing issues are clarified. Specific attention is given to studies supporting stereotype threat, effects of mediated learning experiences, and relative functionalism. Current test development practices are critiqued with respect to methods of validation and item development. Implications of the genetic vs. culture-only arguments are discussed with respect to the malleability of IQ. Rushton and Jensen (2005) review decades of literature to support a genetic basis for the racial/ethnic group hierarchy in intelligence, a position they have held unwaveringly for over 30 years. Their report gives little mention to findings that point to the impact of environment and race (i.e., race as a social construction) on intellectual development or performance—what they term the culture-only perspective. We are not among the culture-only adherents as characterized by

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.320

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lewontin, 1984, Biology, ideology, and human nature: Not in our genes.
  2. Rosner, 2003, On White preferences., Nation (New York, N.Y. : 1865), 276, 24
  3. 10.1037/1076-8971.6.1.33 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suzuki, L., & Aronson, J.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Venue
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
Published
2005-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
320-327
ISSN
  • 1076-8971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1528
OpenAlex
W2118049732
Cited by
48
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology Public Policy and Law (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
stereotype threat, mediated learning experience, heritability of intelligence, social construction of race, exam question design, environmental influences on intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review