Cited by 49Cognitive Abilities and TestingRace, Genetics, and SocietyIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Equal opportunity and racial differences in IQ

Fagan, Joseph F, Holland, Cynthia R·2002·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0160-2896(02)00080-6

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fagan, J. F., & Holland, C. R.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Cuyahoga Community College (US)
Corresponding author
Fagan, Joseph F
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-07
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
361-387
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986646863
Cited by
49
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
intelligence testing, equal opportunities, cultural bias in testing, black-white disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review