Cited by 312Cultural Competency in Health CareCounseling Practices and SupervisionRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Cultural adaptations: Tools for evidence-based practice with diverse populations.

·2012·American Psychological Association eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/13752-000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modifications that focus on increasing the fit of the EBPs with the target population can lead to improved engagement, acceptability, and clinical outcomes, particularly when working with minority populations.

    “In fact, modifications that focus on increasing the fit of the EBPs with the target population can lead to improved engagement, acceptability, and clinical outcomes, particularly when working with minority populations [8–10].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
American Psychological Association eBooks
Published
2012
OpenAlex
W83608921
Cited by
312
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10
FWCI
12.94
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
cultural adaptation, evidence-based practice, diverse populations, cross-cultural psychology, culturally sensitive interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review