Cited by 1,157Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsEconomic Theory and InstitutionsExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis.

Luce, R. Duncan·2005·Dover Publications eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/14396-000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 999

Metadata

Authors
Luce, R. D.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Luce, R. Duncan
Venue
Dover Publications eBooks
Published
2005
OpenAlex
W2094536313
Cited by
1,157
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 53
FWCI
20.89
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Dover Publications eBooks (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (NSF-G2803)
  • Office of Naval Research (G-4506)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
decision-making, choice theory, consumer behavior, utility maximization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review