Cited by 94Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorEmotions and Moral Behavior

Processing of observed pupil size modulates perception of sadness and predicts empathy.

Open access
Harrison, Neil A., Wilson, C. Ellie, Critchley, Hugo D.·2007·Emotion

Abstract

Facial autonomic responses may contribute to emotional communication and reveal individual affective style. In this study, the authors examined how observed pupillary size modulates processing of facial expression, extending the finding that incidentally perceived pupils influence ratings of sadness but not those of happy, angry, or neutral facial expressions. Healthy subjects rated the valence and arousal of photographs depicting facial muscular expressions of sadness, surprise, fear, and disgust. Pupil sizes within the stimuli were experimentally manipulated. Subjects themselves were scored with an empathy questionnaire. Diminishing pupil size linearly enhanced intensity and valence judgments of sad expressions (but not fear, surprise, or disgust). At debriefing, subjects were unaware of differences in pupil size across stimuli. These observations complement an earlier study showing that pupil size directly influences processing of sadness but not other basic emotional facial expressions. Furthermore, across subjects, the degree to which pupil size influenced sadness processing correlated with individual differences in empathy score. Together, these data demonstrate a central role of sadness processing in empathetic emotion and highlight the salience of implicit autonomic signals in affective communication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.724

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, N. A., Wilson, C. E., & Critchley, H. D.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2007
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
724-729
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2116642893
Cited by
94
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
pupil size, facial expression perception, sadness, empathy, emotional valence, emotional arousal, individual differences, emotional communication
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Autonomic Nervous System, Empathy, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Pupil, Unconscious, Psychology, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review