Cited by 44Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesDeception detection and forensic psychology

The power of pupil size in establishing trust and reciprocity.

Open access
Kret, Mariska E., De Dreu, Carsten K. W.·2019·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

The eyes are extremely important in communication and can send a multitude of different messages. Someone's pupil size carries significant social information and can reflect different cognitive and affective states that within a social interaction can prove to be particularly meaningful. In 3 studies we investigated the impact of a person's pupil size on how others evaluate that person. In Experiment 1, participants played trust games in the role of investor. The results demonstrate that participants trusted happy compared with angry partners more, as well as those with dilating compared with constricting pupils, to whom they also assigned more positive personality traits including friendliness, attractiveness, and trustworthiness. In Experiment 2, participants played the same trust game, but this time in the role of trustee, where they had to decide to reciprocate and share a financial gain with the investor or to keep it for themselves, and act selfishly. The results show that participants reciprocated more to partners with dilating compared with constricting pupils. In Experiment 3, we found preliminary evidence that these positive behavioral changes are likely to be specifically directed to the virtual partner and do not reflect a general positivity bias. To conclude, pupil size is an important social cue that others implicitly take into account when making social decisions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/xge0000508

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans have a cognitive tendency to perceive emotional arousal based on iris-pupil contrast and make inferences about a person's personality.

    “humans have a cognitive tendency to perceive emotional arousal based on iris–pupil contrast and make inferences about a person's personality [33–37].”

    From Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    The General Discussion says pupil-size changes can signal arousal, and the Conclusion reports that dilating pupils increased ratings of trustworthiness, friendliness, and attractiveness. Those passages support inferences about emotion and personal qualities from pupils, but our copy does not establish that people perceive arousal specifically from iris–pupil contrast. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Human participants evaluate those with dilating pupils as more friendly, attractive and trustworthy and behave more cooperatively with them in the trust game.

    “For example, people with large pupils are commonly rated as more attractive and activate neural responses in the amygdala [35,36], and a recent study demonstrates that human participants evaluate those with dilating pupils as more friendly, attractive and trustworthy and behave more cooperatively with them in the trust game [37].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. ep10770953 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kret, M. E., & De Dreu, C. K. W.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Kret, Mariska E.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2019-08
Volume
148
Issue
8
Pages
1299-1311
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2912493984
Cited by
44
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Netherlands Science Foundation (016-155-082)
  • Templeton World Charity Foundation (0267)
  • Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
pupil size, pupil dilation, trust, reciprocity, trustworthiness, social cues, facial expressions, emotion perception, trust game, virtual partner
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Decision Making, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Pupil, Trust, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review