Cited by 68Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Electrophysiological correlates of encoding and retrieving emotional events

Koenig, Stefanie, Mecklinger, Axel·2008·Emotion

Abstract

This study examined the impact of emotional content on encoding and retrieval processes. Event-related potentials were recorded in a source recognition memory task. During encoding, a posterior positivity for positive and negative pictures (250-450 ms) that presumably reflects attentional capturing of emotionally valenced stimuli was found. Additionally, positive events, which were also rated as less arousing than negative events, gave rise to anterior and posterior slow wave activity as compared with neutral and negative events and also showed enhanced recognition memory. It is assumed that positive low-arousing events enter controlled and elaborated encoding processes that are beneficial for recognition memory performance. The high arousal of negative events may interfere with controlled encoding mechanisms and attenuate item recognition and the quality of remembering. Moreover, topographically distinct late posterior negativities were obtained for the retrieval of the context features location and time that support the view that this component reflects processes in service of reconstructing the study episode by binding together contextual details with an item and that varies with the kind of episodic detail to be retrieved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.162

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The late positive potential (LPP) is a centroparietal slow wave that seems to be modulated by higher-level cognitive processing and has been demonstrated to be sensitive to stimulus predictability.

    “The LPP is a centroparietal slow wave that seems to be modulated by higher-level cognitive processing (29) and has been demonstrated to be sensitive to stimulus predictability (30)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koenig, S., & Mecklinger, A.
Affiliations
Saarland University (DE)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2008
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
162-173
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2047112236
Cited by
68
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
German Research Society (FOR 448)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
emotional memory, memory encoding, memory retrieval, recognition memory, event-related potentials, emotional valence, arousal, attentional capture, slow-wave activity, posterior negativity, episodic memory, context retrieval
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Arousal, Association Learning, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Contingent Negative Variation, Decision Making, Discrimination Learning, Dominance, Cerebral, Electroencephalography, Emotions, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review