Cited by 144Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

A new mode of fear expression: perceptual bias in height fear

Open access
Teachman, Bethany A., Stefanucci, Jeanine K., Clerkin, Elise M., Cody, Meghan W., Proffitt, Dennis R.·2008·Emotion

Abstract

Emotion and psychopathology researchers have described the fear response as consisting of four main components--subjective affect, physiology, cognition, and behavior. The current study provides evidence for an additional component in the domain of height fear (perception) and shows that it is distinct from measures of cognitive processing. Individuals High (N = 35) and Low (N = 36) in acrophobic symptoms looked over a two-story balcony ledge and estimated its vertical extent using a direct height estimation task (visual matching), and an indirect task (size estimation); the latter task seems to exhibit little influence from cognitive factors. In addition, implicit and explicit measures of cognitive processing were obtained. Results indicated that, as expected, the High Fear group showed greater relative, implicit height fear associations and explicit threat cognitions. Of primary interest, the High (compared to Low) Fear group estimated the vertical extent to be higher, and judged target sizes to be greater, even when controlling for the cognitive bias measures. These results suggest that emotional factors such as fear are related to perception.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.296

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When asked to stand on a balcony, height-fearful individuals more strongly endorsed danger-related thoughts and thoughts of being unable to cope with anxiety than low-fear participants.

    “Additionally, when asked to stand on a balcony, height-fearful individuals more strongly endorsed experiencing thoughts related to danger (e.g., “The railing will not protect me”) and their inability to cope with anxiety (“I will be paralyzed by fear”), compared to low fear participants (Clerkin et al., 2009; Teachman et al., 2008).”
  • The current studies demonstrate that height-fearful individuals interpret heights as dangerous and doubt their ability to cope with anxiety.

    “Consistent with past research (e.g., Clerkin et al., 2009; Menzies & Clark, 1995; Teachman et al., 2008), the current studies demonstrate that height fearful individuals interpret heights to be dangerous and they doubt their ability to cope with their anxiety.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Barlow DH. Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic (2nd ed.) New York: Guilford Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teachman, B. A., Stefanucci, J. K., Clerkin, E. M., Cody, M. W., & Proffitt, D. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • William & Mary (US)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2008
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
296-301
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2012276805
Cited by
144
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
12.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (RO1MH075781-01A2)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
acrophobia, perceptual bias, fear expression, stature estimation, size estimation, emotion and perception, cognitive biases
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Altitude, Attention, Discrimination Learning, Distance Perception, Fear, Female, Humans, Individuality, Judgment, Male, Orientation, Perceptual Distortion, Personality Inventory, Phobic Disorders, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review