Cited by 46Emotions and Moral BehaviorMental Health via WritingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Individual differences in negative affect repair.

Hemenover, Scott H., Augustine, Adam A., Shulman, Tirza, Tran, Tuan Q., Barlett, Christopher P.·2008·Emotion

Abstract

The extant literature implicates affect repair ability as one source of individual differences in negative affect. Emerging from this literature are three regulatory traits that should predict repair ability (negative mood regulation expectancies, monitoring, labeling), yet no experimental examination of this possibility exists. Two studies explored this issue. Participants (Ns=305, 146) watched negative affect-inducing videos and completed a repair or control writing task, before and after which they reported their affect. Results revealed wide individual differences in repair ability. Specifically, participants with high expectancies of repair success and those who attend to and understand their affect experienced the largest decreases in negative affect and largest increases in positive affect following the repair tasks. These findings advance understanding of individual differences in affect regulation and have implications for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.468

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hemenover, S. H., Augustine, A. A., Shulman, T., Tran, T. Q., & Barlett, C. P.
Affiliations
  • Western Illinois University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
  • Idaho State University (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2008-08
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
468-478
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2015921525
Cited by
46
References
74
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
negative affect, individual differences, emotion regulation, affect labeling, positive affect
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Control, Informal, Videotape Recording

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review